Feet rating stats (64 total votes)
36
beautiful
beautiful
15
nice
nice
8
ok
ok
3
bad
bad
2
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info9 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Vanessa Kelly's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2014-07-09 16:04:21 @DocStrangelove... Rather don't edit out nudity, here that's still considered A/C and thus won't help at all.
|
|
2014-07-09 16:23:11 @Doc- Yes, please do yourself a favor and go to the site's Home Page, and look for a small link near top right "Site Guidelines" and review those. Included is this:
o WikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked. |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-07-09 16:47:34 Ok, thank you to you both for your advices!
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
Reported: Adult Content
2014-07-09 16:01:19 Yes !
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
Reported: Adult Content
2014-07-09 16:00:55 this is nice
|
|
2014-07-09 14:12:00 If you missed it, the following photos will be removed for A/C, but they were awesome:
#1391578, 1391580, 1391593 & 1391594. Enjoy! |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-07-09 15:16:06 I can understand 1391593 & 1391594, because there were some breasts visible in transparency, but I don't understand #1391578: there were no feminine attributes showing at all!
|
|
2014-07-09 15:31:29 On #1391578, I was on the fence about it, but it is 'nudity' in a way, and more than that, there was underboob showing on her right breast under the flower, and that's one of @Creator's 'unwritten' adult content rules... "No underboob, no sideboob." Shame, as I like 'em both and *all* those pic were GOLD as @Grik said. I posted the numbers so interested parties can still access them. Hopefully we can find other pics to add to the gallery of this beauty!
|
