The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Well here's the money shot..........her feet,especially her soles, all of them, manifique here!!!!!
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010 ♛69
2014-03-16 16:16:40
@Grik- I dunno, man. This looks fairly 'unadorned'--> other than a simple pair of sandals, and in every photo in this gallery, for my taste, darn near perfection. Even in your 'but wait' exemplar (#781080) I don't see a lot wrong other than a little puffiness, perhaps due to heat, sand, soaking in water, or wrong 'time of month' bloating. Everybody has a bad day or bad camera angle; I'm thinking you've pulled a 'Digby' here, the visual equivalent of the worst-case-scenario logical fallacy: "Making an argument based on the worst-case scenario rather than the most probable scenario, allowing fear to prevail over reason." One thing remains clear. She is 'ready for Angus' (and vice versa) even if not for Grik.
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
Grik
Member since 05/2012 ♛54
2014-03-16 04:45:58
Here is Exhibit #2, the same feet unadorned, and not so crash hot eh?!?!
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
Grik
Member since 05/2012 ♛54
2014-03-16 04:45:04
Now, this pic is Exhibit #1 for the Prosecution re how feet should be judged. I have always judges feet should be judged au natural or adorned only by Havaianas. Here, her feet look magnificent, even more so with the anklet. But, wait a moment..................?
