SweetFeetFan (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-30 06:37:36
Eh, not to get into a political debate, but I don't see much problem with it. I mean, after all, that's what breasts are for.
Templar97 (user)2014-11-03 02:02:42
@SFF- Totally agree. Breasts are beautiful, of course, but were intended to feed and cushion babies. They were later perverted into a male sex object. Don't you just love America's unashamed objectification of women's bodies? Not saying I don't like titties. I do. However, I recognize their true purpose, unlike some guys I've seen. :)
SweetFeetFan (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-23 23:25:18
"Don't you just love America's unashamed objectification of women's bodies?"
I hope you appreciate the irony of this.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-24 07:14:00
As sexual objects, they should not be exposed in public. For feeding babies, perfectly fine and very natural.
@T97- Breasts are dual-purpose, just like reproductive organs. *One* purpose is feeding (or making) babies, the other is giving sexual pleasure to the husband and wife (which entices them into making & feeding babies). They're meant to be appreciated by men (e.g. Song of Solomon 4:5, 7:3)
celebs (user)2014-11-24 07:31:55
I fully agree with BiB & I Feel that feeding in public is just to draw an extra attention, nothing else