Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2216
(3.61% reported)
sterne - 2191
(0.82% reported)
toelover143 - 1247
(0.40% reported)
Mr Hate - 1161
(0.78% reported)
feetlover235 - 1094
(22.76% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Emma Watson (II)

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 7 US edit
Nationality: United Kingdom edit
Rating stats (5166 total votes)
3989
beautiful
488
nice
234
ok
51
bad
404
ugly

Rating:
 (gorgeous feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
Skip down to wall ∨
+options
745 x 169id. 1413096
+
545 x 185id. 1413095
+
600 x 749id. 1402149
+
767 x 651id. 1402148
+
900 x 400id. 1401948
+
1667 x 2500id. 1399532
+
1542 x 2500id. 1399531
+
817 x 1024id. 1399524
+
3000 x 4500id. 1395124
+
2717 x 4075id. 1392949
+
2001 x 3000id. 1392686
+
1668 x 1284id. 1368917
+
1500 x 2100id. 1365705
+
521 x 493id. 1341380
+
1385 x 2272id. 1327887
+
1395 x 2272id. 1327886
+
1467 x 2272id. 1327885
+
1414 x 2272id. 1327883
+
1616 x 2272id. 1327882
+
1524 x 2272id. 1327880
+
1503 x 2272id. 1327879
+
1443 x 2272id. 1327878
+
1477 x 2272id. 1327877
+
1457 x 2272id. 1327876
+
1361 x 2272id. 1327875
+
1413 x 2272id. 1327874
+
1452 x 2272id. 1327873
+
1414 x 2272id. 1327872
+
1414 x 2272id. 1327871
+
1582 x 2272id. 1327870
+
1430 x 2272id. 1327869
+
1426 x 2272id. 1327868
+
1467 x 2272id. 1327867
+
1403 x 2272id. 1327865
+
1331 x 2272id. 1327864
+
1389 x 2272id. 1327863
+
1397 x 2272id. 1327862
+
1419 x 2272id. 1327861
+
2310 x 3660id. 1318685
+
4961 x 3508id. 1316857
+
1280 x 1920id. 1315847
+
2440 x 3718id. 1304900
+
2479 x 3344id. 1304856
+
2048 x 2784id. 1304854
+
3400 x 2400id. 1304789
+
2140 x 3000id. 1304693
+
1935 x 3000id. 1304692
+
2031 x 3000id. 1304691
+
1944 x 3000id. 1304690
+
1996 x 3000id. 1304688
+
1996 x 3000id. 1304687
+
2143 x 3000id. 1304686
+
1996 x 3000id. 1304685
+
1910 x 3000id. 1304683
+
1910 x 3000id. 1304682
+
2400 x 3600id. 1304681
+
2287 x 3600id. 1304680
+
2323 x 3600id. 1304675
+
2968 x 2312id. 1304674
+
1719 x 3000id. 1304612
+
1561 x 2775id. 1304611
+
1584 x 3000id. 1304610
+
1486 x 2303id. 1304609
+
2163 x 3330id. 1304472
+
2224 x 3252id. 1304471
+
1978 x 2975id. 1304470
+
2000 x 3000id. 1303615
+
3000 x 2000id. 1300745
+
3540 x 4458id. 1291006
+
1280 x 1924id. 1289082
+
1280 x 1925id. 1289080
+
1280 x 2193id. 1289076
+
1360 x 1815id. 1289073
+
2239 x 3135id. 1283075
+
3709 x 4950id. 1270236
+
2407 x 2627id. 1262031
+
1280 x 1920id. 1257557
+
2868 x 2256id. 1256840
+
370 x 487id. 1248487
+
370 x 508id. 1248486
+
1134 x 1446id. 1248478
+
2560 x 1646id. 1247706
+
1481 x 1942id. 1240814
+
1280 x 720id. 1235282
+
1920 x 1080id. 1234825
+
432 x 650id. 1234444
+
5184 x 3456id. 1210964
+
5184 x 3456id. 1209746
+
5184 x 3456id. 1209665
+
2197 x 1463id. 1209188
+
1069 x 1227id. 1209022
+
947 x 1227id. 1208993
+
2197 x 1463id. 1208992
+
5365 x 3757id. 1199348
+
2520 x 3992id. 1191056
+
2362 x 3696id. 1191055
+
2496 x 3776id. 1191054
+
1620 x 2428id. 1183935
+
1597 x 3050id. 1183128
+
2391 x 3600id. 1183127
+
1025 pics left  
more info1514 pictures were removed from this gallery.

Got anymore Emma Watson Feet Pictures? Upload Here
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-07-24 16:34:15Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Emma's feet confuse me. Sometimes they look stunningly beautiful and at other times, like in this pic, they look fairly average. Can't be perfect all the time i suppose and we all have off days......Lord knows i do!
 
Reply
Block user
laddishot  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-24 17:42:56
From what I see the only wrong thing are the high heels. She gave up her nice feet for "long legs".
Block user
Reply
laddishot  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-24 19:14:38
By the way, this picture shows one reason why I dislike high heels so so much.
Block user
Reply
therevanchist  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-07-24 19:55:55
@S: Very ordinary looking peds on most occasions. The reason why I now downgrade her to 'nice', something I thought about doing for a long time.
Block user
Reply
Girlyfeet  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-07-27 21:51:59
I always felt she had rather average feet myself. Decent, pleasant, but unremarkable. I also notice she has a tendency to wear ill-fitting shoes, this is not good for either her or us in the future. Age is bad enough, but combine that with deformity and you got some real unattractive problems.
Block user
Reply
capslock  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-27 23:52:49
And my opinion is that she has perfect feet. Different strokes....
Block user
Reply
luvsexyarches  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-07-28 20:27:45
She certainly is a very beautiful and talented actress no doubt but I think
they are highly overated in my humble opinion. I think she could a better job
of caring for them considering all the millions she makes. As said above different
strokes.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-17 02:59:47
Nothing to say, just bumping this thread so I don't have to see those gawd-awful dead fish shoes in the other thread!
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-17 03:08:36
Ordinary? Average? Overrated? I agree with capslock. Her feet are just perfect. Especially those beautiful little toes!
Block user
Reply
joker999  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-17 04:13:36
I <3 just about everything about her feet. Especially her toes and how she's grows her nails out a little bit. Drives me crazy. She's in my Elite 8.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-17 04:15:26
@joker- How many are in your Elite Eight? @Grik and I both have several dozen in our Top Ten! ;)
Block user
Reply
joker999  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-17 04:16:48
@BiB - I tried a top 10 but the final 2 spots kept changing so I decided to just stay with 8.
Block user
Reply
2014-08-17 02:53:05bastinado  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Simply The Best
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-12 20:04:49ak2011j  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
fell for her shapely feet in this pic
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-01 05:27:17Oedipus  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I love this girl's feet, but those are some damn butt-ugly shoes.
 
Reply
Block user
Iluvfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-01 06:38:15
@BiB - never mind Kate Walsh's shoes, you want to talk offensive. These are finger down my throat offensive.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-01 06:51:29
WHOA! That's pretty bad. Looks like a couple of half-scaled rotting dead fish!
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-01 06:54:30
I can think of zero redeeming factors in these shoes. Nil, nada, zilch!
Block user
Reply
therevanchist  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-04 02:15:46
These shoes could be inherited family property. They go with 500 year old sackcloth she is gonna present on the next red carpet.
Block user
Reply
KurtKurt  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-07 12:41:08
BackInBlack nailed it. Perfect description for these hideous clogs.
Block user
Reply
sterne  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2014-08-11 15:52:18

To me, her feet are overrated, many people do not rate feet here.They vote according to some criterias they're the ones who know.
Block user
Reply
pidgeon66  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-11 23:54:14
Going by feet alone I'd vote gorgeous. But if I were just going by these shoes...
Block user
Reply
Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-12 00:00:07
OMG!!!!!!!! You could not pay me to wear those things!!!!
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-12 00:11:11
And yet, she did it FREE, or more likely, PAID a lot of money to buy them!
Block user
Reply
2014-07-26 05:10:32KurtKurt  (user)
One thing that's not up for debate: Emma Watson has got some of the most stunningly high arches on the planet. For an arch guy like me, that's all that matters!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-21 22:39:49ChronoWarrior  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
She became a beautiful goddess...
Love her natural toenails
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-19 05:42:04tweety  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Love how her toes taper down from big toe to pinkie toe but in this pic that pinkie toe looks like it would be going "Wee Wee Wee" in pain:)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-17 23:58:57Taran  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
These shoes are size 38, which is a size smaller than the last one... depending on the size chart one uses can be anything between 7.5 US and 8 US...
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-16 14:49:13epiceli  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
amazing
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-15 20:52:02pidgeon66  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
BTW, when I found this pic it had that annoying tag (you know the one) right across the toes. It was actually surprisingly easy to remove, aided by the fact that it's a larger picture and in-focus (the tag is transparent with opaque words, and causes some detail to be irreversibly lost).

If anyone has any Emma pics that are ruined by tags, send them my way/post their wikifeet # and I'll see if they're salvageable! :)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-05-14 23:09:38Taran  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@dinsdag: that pic was on here before but got reported as "no feet showing". It's also the source for the shoe size information. You can read "39" pretty well.
 
Reply
Block user
double  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-15 16:20:22
I'm so confused...this eBay listing of the shoes she put up for charity has her listed as 37.5:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Emma-Watson-Signed-Burberry-Shoes-Size-37-5-/200999033718?nma=true&si=oXmsOXK%252Bi%252BLImyD9pITGMmJNE4k%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

...which would make her feet a whole lot smaller than a size 8.5
Block user
Reply
pidgeon66  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-15 20:45:06
It's possible at least one of the pairs, if not both, were too small and/or too large. It could also simply be accounting for different designers and shoe styles.
Block user
Reply
2014-07-11 16:51:25zauberbarni  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Hey, what about 1316857 or 1199348 or lots of others? And why are not all my other pictures removed? I thought there were some rules here!? Who decides what!?
ptbc: I don't understand your definition of duplicate. "Edited duplicates", thats an oxymoron.
@MrHate Why are you so unpolite?
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-11 17:23:29
@Aauberbarni- Very short answers; others can elaborate if you have questions:

1) Agree that 'edited duplicate' is an oxymoron.
2) There *are* rules here; as in real life, some people bend, break & blatantly ignore rules. Many here never even read the site guidelines
3) Who decides on if a pic stays or goes? ANY registered user, and s/he does so *anonymously* and therefore unaccountably; the site owner will not correct this, but at least made the process require a few multiple votes in agreement now.
4) Based on a few years of seeing what pics are kept vs. rejected, users here seem to prefer *single* HQ or UHQ photos that clearly show feet, and the barer the better. Some of your collages probably do OK in 'thinly-populated' galleries; not so much on the most popular ones (like this one).
5) Mr.Hate is simply being himself. He is #1 top uploader of all time, a Trusted Uploader, legend of Wikifeet. As such, he almost thinks of the galleries as 'his' work and takes it seriously, often in a personal way. But he's cool when you get to know him, and does great work. Site would be very different without him.
6) If you're not in the Guild, consider joining and earning 500 Guild Experience (by evaluating comments) so you can participate in Guild Chat to discuss these & other issues in 'real time.'

Hope this info is of some help. Thanks for participating here! (Or as @Toe says, "Have a nice day, and thank you for flying Wikifeet.")
Block user
Reply
Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-11 17:37:38
IMO...these are nothing but glorified duplicates. There are no rules here about uploading these collages or whatever the hell they are called. It is a matter of personal preference. I will continue to report these as duplicate. I don't actively seek them out but when I come across them, o well. Perhaps you can create a poll in Chat. I will comply with the majority votes. Now, I know you must be brimming with anticipation to your question as to why I seem so unpolite. I did not know I was being unpolite. I was merely being brutally honest.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-11 17:46:10
@Hate- Yes, some people can't cope with hard truths, especially when expressed in an unvarnished way. I tend to express mine as I see them in just that manner, and a lot of folks don't like it. Over time, I've learned to temper it... a little! ;)

I've found this *especially* true of women, who are famous for saying, "I just want a man who will be *totally* honest with me!" No, you don't, baby, you just *think* you do. "YOU CAN'T *HANDLE* THE TRUTH!" (~Col. Jessup)
Block user
Reply
zauberbarni  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-11 19:02:14
Thanks for your answers!
To put it in MrHate words: I personally don't give a rat's arse if someone personally doesn't like my pictures or if they are officially declared as duplicates. But this is not about hard truths, it's just about a little respect. Do you think, if someone is brutally honest, it's impossible to be unpolite at the same time? I know it's possible, it's also possible to be brutally honest and to be polite at the same time. But anyway, thanks again for your answers.
Block user
Reply
L1NGUS  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-11 19:24:18
@zauberbarni - It took more than one person to send the collages to the crapper and I'm not afraid to step up and say I was one of them. While I can appreciate that they probably took some time and effort to create, they are nothing more than duplicates in my opinion, and therefore wasted effort on your part. Imagine what you could accomplish if you redirected all that effort and used it to upload new material rather than recycle it. I didn't find @Mr Hate's comment to be impolite or disrespectful in the least. He stated himself clearly and concisely as I am also attempting to do.
Block user
Reply
ptbc  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-12 06:21:12
Here's the thing zauberbarni, what you're doing is taking existing pictures of feet, putting them together and giving them a nice fancy background. Which is great, I appreciate the time & effort, but the thing is nobody comes here to look at a picture's background & those feet pictures are already posted here.

Dupliacte = exactly like something else.

The feet, which is what people come here to see & what this site is all about, are EXACTLY like her feet in the other pictures already posted her. As much work as you did to those pictures, it doesn't mean the feet are suddenly different. Her feet are exactly the same as what has already been posted here, in other words they are a duplicate.

Unfortunately, the rule on duplicate pictures does not specifically address collages & until it does everyone is going to have their own opinion as to what constitutes a duplicate photo. For example, I did report those other Emma feet collages you pointed out, but they were unreported by another member. Until the site admin addresses this topic specifically, there are going to be these disagreements & members will do what they feel is correct. I for one will keep reporting these collages as I come across them.
Block user
Reply
zauberbarni  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-12 14:10:50
@L1NGUS, @ptbc - I'm rather a creator/designer than a collector and uploader of always similar pics (where you have to zoom in and out again to get a view of the whole thing/person and the detail/feet) like in an administration. In my opinion I direct all my effort and use it to create and upload new material.
I'm afraid you don't see that the whole is more than the sum of its parts, but that’s ok as well. It's obviously not granted to everyone. Maybe you had a different opinion if you had a look at my whole work.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-12 14:43:15
@zauberbarni- I like them fine, and I don't think anyone is being critical of your fine work. We're just trying to tell you that on *this* site for the tastes of the 'average' user here, not to be disappointed if they don't all love it and if most get reported as 'duplicates' and removed, for the reasons others have laid out (really no truly 'new' material, just reworked 'mashups' of extant photos). Most users here want a *single* UHQ photo they can enlarge/zoom for fine detail just as you have expressed. They, no kidding, argue over nailbeds, hangnails, corns, moles, etc.
Block user
Reply
2014-07-06 03:52:01pidgeon66  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Duplicate
Thanks again Watsonfeet88! Some more info for those curious:

-This is not a recent picture unfortunately, it's from 2012.

-By this date last year, we had nearly 40 new candid pics of Emma in sandals or other open-toed shoes. So far this season we only have 2! Definite drought. I'm hoping the idiom proves correct in this case, too: "when it rains, it pours!"
 
Reply
Block user
watsonfeet88  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-09 01:27:35
No problem pidgeon66 :) , is great to share Emma beautifull feet with others... she has the most amazing feet around the world and everyone must see them!! haha :P
Block user
Reply
pidgeon66  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-09 20:00:21
Haha, I have to agree. If it wasn't for Emma I doubt I would have ever officially signed up with a username. Plenty of other celebs have pretty or sexy feet, but Emma just has the most adorable piggies on the planet - no question about it, no competition, no second-in-line to the throne and no runners-up! :)
Block user
Reply
joker999  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-09 23:47:34
It's funny how the open-toe candid pics for celebs vary from year to year.
Block user
Reply
pidgeon66  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-11 03:19:50
Huh, it got removed. If this was really a dupe, could someone please post the number of the original? Thank you
Block user
Reply
TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)2014-07-11 03:49:33
@P66 hon it's strange I searched through the entire gallery twice and couldn't get the original either, so go figure ...
Block user
Reply
2014-07-11 02:37:57Slim_Tx_413  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Best feet ever
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-07 03:19:57ptbc  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Can someone please explain to me how photoshopped collages made up entirely of feet pics that are already posted here are not considered duplicates? Ex: pic #1387430 is just a photoshopped version of 1304900. Pic #1387429 is just a photoshopped combination of pics 1304675 & 1304692. And Pic #1387428 is a photoshopped combination of pics 1304611, 1304681 & 1304693. And there are many more phots like this, all have been reported as duplicates & all have been unreported even under the new reporting system. I don't understand, how are these suddenly new pictures?
 
Reply
Block user
TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)2014-07-07 04:02:05
We agree @PTBC but your use of logic/common sense is beyond the reach of your average Wikfeeter ...
Block user
Reply
zauberbarni  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-07 17:28:33
I know what you mean, ptbc, but: duplicates are duplicates. What I am doing is "just" making new pictures out of existing ones (not using Photoshop), called collages: new pictue - old content - no duplicate! Don't forget: These are not just combinations of pics, the whole is more than the sum of its parts! By the way, "just" means lots and lots of hours of work for one collage.
Block user
Reply
dinsdag  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-08 00:06:15
I like them, as far as I have anything to say: they can stay
Block user
Reply
ptbc  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-08 23:58:53
I understand the time you put into them but you're posting pictures of her feet. Those pictures of her feet are already posted here, none of them are new just edited. They're duplicates. Edited duplicates, but still duplicates.
Block user
Reply
Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-09 02:09:42
I say these pics go. They litter all the galleries. I personally don't give a rat's arse about the time it takes to create this crapola. They are duplicates of already uploaded pics. Understand? Stuff them on some other site.
Block user
Reply
L1NGUS  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-09 02:11:53
Ditto @Mr Hate.
Block user
Reply
2014-07-08 22:57:11Johnny916  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Duplicate
Where did this come from?
 
Reply
Block user
watsonfeet88  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-09 01:23:56
it is from a behind the scenes video from a vogue photoshoot from a couple of years :)
Block user
Reply
2014-07-07 04:30:39reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Duplicate
Not Rachel Bilson luscious, but darn yummy just the same.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-07 03:34:40Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Duplicate
I agree with you ptbc. Pics like these help make galleries larger than they have to be. Collage de Crapola.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-06 13:23:26legend00115  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Duplicate
Every inch, so perfect in so many ways......

LUSCIOUSLY DELICIOUSLY HOT....
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-06 09:39:32christee82  (user)
I always wanted to see her feet in pantyhose & just wanna say, Damn they are sexy
 
Reply
Block user
497 wall posts left