Trolls beware!
The guild is being extra awesome right now.
Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2486
(1.57% reported)
sterne - 2400
(1.33% reported)
Grik - 1552
(7.09% reported)
toelover143 - 1437
(3.48% reported)
Mr Hate - 1112
(1.71% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Kate Beckinsale

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 9.5 US edit
Nationality: United Kingdom edit
Rating stats (3013 total votes)
2271
beautiful
391
nice
182
ok
62
bad
107
ugly

Rating:
 (gorgeous feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
Skip down to wall ∨
+options
2880 x 1620id. 1461864
+
3300 x 4859id. 1461298
+
3300 x 4851id. 1461297
+
1450 x 2190id. 1460929
+
1450 x 2283id. 1460928
+
1450 x 2458id. 1460927
+
1294 x 2048id. 1455745
+
1205 x 2048id. 1454887
+
634 x 982id. 1454802
+
634 x 891id. 1454801
+
2300 x 3247id. 1454800
+
2400 x 3600id. 1454799
+
2670 x 3550id. 1452489
+
3032 x 4328id. 1452488
+
2400 x 4090id. 1451753
+
2400 x 3600id. 1451745
+
2400 x 3588id. 1451744
+
2400 x 4004id. 1451743
+
2400 x 4205id. 1451739
+
3063 x 4341id. 1450996
+
1084 x 1600id. 1450084
+
1200 x 900id. 1450080
+
768 x 1100id. 1450077
+
1024 x 768id. 1450076
+
1200 x 900id. 1450074
+
Reported: No Feet Showing
Is it justified?   YES   NO
2000 x 1500id. 1450073
+
634 x 892id. 1445087
+
634 x 823id. 1445086
+
634 x 899id. 1445085
+
634 x 658id. 1445084
+
634 x 875id. 1445083
+
634 x 731id. 1445082
+
953 x 1365id. 1444982
+
1067 x 711id. 1444980
+
1400 x 1700id. 1431486
+
900 x 1500id. 1412267
+
2395 x 3600id. 1412253
+
3456 x 5184id. 1412074
+
3456 x 5184id. 1412072
+
1777 x 2928id. 1411480
+
2395 x 3600id. 1411479
+
634 x 1079id. 1411044
+
634 x 1051id. 1411043
+
2850 x 3859id. 1411042
+
2850 x 4098id. 1411041
+
2060 x 3000id. 1402657
+
2049 x 3255id. 1402656
+
1845 x 2772id. 1399795
+
1866 x 3000id. 1399794
+
1500 x 2253id. 1399793
+
1397 x 2250id. 1399792
+
1496 x 2250id. 1399791
+
1572 x 2362id. 1399790
+
1572 x 2362id. 1399789
+
1477 x 2250id. 1399788
+
2575 x 3600id. 1382623
+
3456 x 5184id. 1382622
+
3456 x 5184id. 1382621
+
3456 x 5184id. 1382620
+
1185 x 3829id. 1378922
+
2928 x 4026id. 1378803
+
2611 x 3648id. 1378802
+
2802 x 4392id. 1378801
+
2977 x 4326id. 1378800
+
2691 x 3534id. 1378799
+
2739 x 4000id. 1378798
+
3051 x 3906id. 1378797
+
3210 x 3826id. 1378796
+
2882 x 3792id. 1378795
+
3013 x 3646id. 1378794
+
664 x 636id. 1356291
+
600 x 800id. 1356281
+
1024 x 768id. 1356275
+
1577 x 3000id. 1354747
+
2395 x 3600id. 1353078
+
2390 x 3600id. 1353074
+
2390 x 3600id. 1353069
+
2053 x 3000id. 1352551
+
2148 x 3000id. 1352550
+
2075 x 3000id. 1352488
+
2033 x 3000id. 1352487
+
2164 x 3100id. 1339657
+
2164 x 3100id. 1339656
+
2164 x 3100id. 1339655
+
2164 x 3100id. 1339654
+
2164 x 3100id. 1339652
+
1488 x 2283id. 1315282
+
1764 x 3014id. 1315281
+
1842 x 3000id. 1315280
+
2313 x 3508id. 1315279
+
1464 x 2679id. 1315278
+
2304 x 3500id. 1315277
+
1557 x 3086id. 1315276
+
2142 x 3346id. 1315275
+
1572 x 2362id. 1315274
+
1575 x 2362id. 1315273
+
1496 x 2250id. 1315272
+
1383 x 2250id. 1315271
+
1575 x 2362id. 1315270
+
1382 x 2079id. 1315269
+
1109 pics left  
more info526 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Kate Beckinsale's feet, also liked:
Olga Kurylenko
Danica Patrick
Kristin Cavallari
Kristen Bell (I)
Keira Knightley
Got anymore Kate Beckinsale Feet Pictures? Upload Here
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-09-15 23:35:07Soul Collector  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I'm always happy to see a celebrity who is willing to sign an autograph. She's one of the good ones!!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-15 02:56:14Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Elegantly chic with gorgeous feet
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-10 14:04:39Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
those toes that pose the shoe all make for a great view. Kates feet and toes are so sexy! who is the blond beauty next to her?
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-10 16:48:20
Cara Delevingne. Too bad your Google is broken.


"Sarcasm: Just ONE of the services I provide!"
Block user
Reply
Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-11 05:04:37
When someone yells out Dick! I bet you always turn around lol. (Sarcasim) thanks fir the info on cara.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-11 05:28:43
@Toelvr- I'm just starting to get frustrated and crabby spending so much time doing this for others when it's so easy to do especially with Chrome or Firefox. Cara's kinda hot, huh? ;)
Block user
Reply
2014-09-08 15:08:10Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
dark polish light polish no p[olish. it doesnt matter. her toes are super sexy and just amazing
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 20:32:38BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Duplicate
Nice! This is a 'quasi-dupe' of #20047 also uploaded by @Creator, 2nd pic in the gallery, but the older one is a magazine scan, so not sure whether to report the older one or not. @Hate? Thoughts?



#chaiselounge
 
Reply
Block user
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-06 23:13:02
Report mine! I found it in a russian site, without the text. I thought it wouldn't be a dup of creator's. It is funny all this fuss, including banishment, when red carpet redundant pics are widely accepted and take much more space and time. I am not arguing, just voicing my viewpoint.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-06 23:17:39
@Szel - and you're right about the abundant red carpet pics. That's another pain in the a$$ that we Guilders deal with often!
Block user
Reply
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 00:15:52
Thanks for the feedback, @Iluvfeet. I really appreciated.
Block user
Reply
tweety  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 00:31:30
@Szel that's what makes it hard with red carpet events some people upload every thing (Kohler uploada as we call them) then as @Creator has told us we can report on pics when feet are in the same position well looking through 100 pics is a B*itch trying to compare all pics :(
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-07 03:06:01
@Szel- Sorry for the outburst, it's just hard for us to go look for dupes when it's the uploaders job. @Mr.Hate and I have been around so long and have 'pornographic memories' so we usually *know* a duplicate when we see it, but have to still go *check* and make sure it's still there. Keep uploading, just *please* try to check for dupes more carefully first.

Re the 'abundant similar pics' on red carpets and candid paparazzi pics, you are *correct* and as of July 1 there is a new rule that those can be reported as 'duplicates' if the *foot position* is the same in two or more of them.
Block user
Reply
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 10:01:18
OK! All cleared up! I am sorry as well.
Block user
Reply
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 23:33:31
I would like very much to see this episode come to an end. But the new concept of "quasi-dupe" was introduced to us, which, I think is already too much to handle. The definition of "duplicate" is subjective enough to cause all these stains in Kate's gallery. The point is: Can the Guild give us a clear-cut definition of DUPLICATE? Don't answer here, please, just think it over. In the first place, here is a place to discuss aesthetics, is it not?
Block user
Reply
2014-09-06 20:15:31BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Duplicate
@Szel- DUPLICATE of #20046 by @Creator (Site Owner) on 08-19-2008 - The very FIRST photo in this gallery.

This has to stop! Check for duplicates before you upload! You should know another user was just *banned* from the site for doing this same thing.
 
Reply
Block user
Soul Collector  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 16:59:22
I don't believe that someone got banned just for uploading a duplicate photo!!
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-07 17:02:26
@SC- He didn't. He got banned for uploading *many* duplicate photos *every day*, *hundreds and hundreds* of duplicate photos in total. Look in the upper left corner there, and for a little while, you'll still see him on the 30-day top uploader list, with about 1000 uploads... and 42% reported.
Block user
Reply
2014-09-06 20:28:36BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
@feetmanic- Here's an idea. How about *you* go look through 1095 pics in the gallery for @Szel's duplicates, then *you* can post them all by number in ONE, single, concise comment, and I'll go run my errands and eat my lunch!

Actually, the reason I did this was that I'm *trying* to get @Szel's attention before he gets his account banned, and thought a few comments might do the trick to catch his eye.
 
Reply
Block user
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-06 23:45:54
Sounds like a real threat. This thing of "banishment due to dups" belongs to site rules? What is to happen to those with "not so fast internet" and can't check extensive pages all day long (hours, let's say)? It seems I am doomed!
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-07 03:09:53
@Szel- Well, again, sorry for the angry rant; was just frustrated and *do* appreciate your uploads, sometimes even when dupes just to *remind* me of a great photo. The site owner himself said he doesn't *expect* people to check all the way through very large galleries (more than 1,000 pics) and is at some point going to have a program that checks for picture similarity, and that should help, but could be many months away in being implemented.

However, if the photo is more than a week old, it's usually a safe bet *someone* has uploaded it here at some point.
Block user
Reply
saucy jack  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 08:29:43
I hope this was all worked out. Give Szel a break. Like he said, he doesn't have fast internet--believe it or not--not everybody has DSL. If he is posting pics that he believes may be new and it takes him ten minutes to view each page, what would you do? I'd say f-it and post the pic. If it doesn't get flagged as a dupe when posting, then what the hell? Just my opinion. The guy seems to be cool and not trying to spam the site.
Block user
Reply
Toe  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-07 09:22:26
Guys @BIB is right, but it's not personal. He's just trying to save you some trouble down the road. @Creator would of course correct any trouble the system gave you once he knew the deal, but then it's just a major inconvenience for you.

@saucy jack - I think duplicate detection is in the works, and that will save everyone a lot of trouble.

Me and @BIB both have that same problem. Sometimes when we're trying to advise our friends here on how to avoid a problem, it comes out sounding different than what we intended. And take my word for it, when discussions come up about who is spamming the site; Szel's name NEVER comes up.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-07 09:23:39
@saucy jack - Yeah, I tried, but we just came off a similar guy who *was* padding his stats & Spamming the site. I'm sure that's not what @Szel has going, and he's always been a good member. We'll just try to catch the dupes as he goes if he can't check the bigger galleries. Just one question... what the hell is this 'DSL' you mention? (:^p) Nah, I get it. My first two years on Wikifeet, *before* the 'load 100 more' button, I had allegedly 1.5Mbps rural DSL that was really about 700Kbps, and I'd go make a sandwich while waiting for some of the larger galleries to load! Now I'm blessed with 15 Mbps Cable, but everything I read says U.S. IPS's are the *worst in the world.*

http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-internet-access-in-america-disaster/
Block user
Reply
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 10:06:04
@saucy jack, thanks for being supportive. You are a friendly member, bro.
@BIB60, this thing of taking down dupes automatically, is the best way out of the present situation.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-07 10:12:29
@Szel- If your issue is slow Interwebs, then just keep doing what you're doing after you check as much as you can stand. You *do* have great taste in pics, even the duplicates! We'll work it out.

The current 'duplicate checker' doesn't always work, and the planned upgrade is probably many, many months away. Just forget it and do what you've been doing!
Block user
Reply
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-07 12:57:00
Thanks, BIB60. Cristal clear! Let's enjoy the gorgeous celebs.
Block user
Reply
2014-09-06 20:11:57BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Duplicate
@Szel- This one-->
Is also a duplicate of #46056 from 11-09-2009; yours is larger BUT you didn't report the older one as a duplicate.

@All- Please justify the report; it's on the very last page of the gallary.
 
Reply
Block user
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-06 23:06:11
Got it! I reported it.
Block user
Reply
2014-09-06 20:56:58Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@Angus. Heck why not keep them both. I do fine @Creator's pic, even with the print, a better picture.
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-06 21:44:01
I agree on 'keep both.' I didn't report @Creator's.
Block user
Reply
2014-09-06 20:32:57stealthman  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Perfectly PRECIOUS!!!!!!! A truly femininely delightful example how and what magnificence is!! She is perfect!!!! Her fet are that of a Goddess!!!! She is soooooooooooooo dreamy!!!!!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 20:26:14tweety  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I must admit I love this pic she looks so GORGEOUS here just ready to go :)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 20:23:28feetmanic  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Yes I am a guild member but all I'm sayin is once should be good enough
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 20:18:52feetmanic  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Bib60 we get it duplicates say it once don't keep posting about it once is enough
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 20:02:26BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Duplicate
@Szel- As much a we appreciate your uploads of hot photos like this,--->
I'm curious if you carefully check the *entire* gallery, not just the first page, before uploading? Often when I see your new uploads, which I can almost recognize even before checking to see if it's you, I see *many* pictures that I *know* have been in the gallery before. It's possible they have since been removed, but I also see a lot of 'duplicate' reports on your uploads of these older photos. This creates a lot of unnecessary work for other users and the Guild, and also hurts your uploading stats. *Please* check more carefully for duplicates in the future. Thanks!

FOR EXAMPLE: This pic is a much lower resolution duplicate of #856061, uploaded by @Carmello on 12-02-2012. If *I* can find it, *you* can find it. Please don't make us do your job for you!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 14:19:25Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
That is what makes her so BEAUTIFUL to me. As far as cramped in shoes I love her in sandles were those long toes can stretch and overhang just a bit. they are very well pampered TOEs that look BEAUTIFUL and SEXY.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 13:40:14LG  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
I know I'm in the minority here, but her problem seems to be that she has no taper to her toes. The three toes are uniformly as long as the big one. Normal feet have toes that taper from the first to the little toe. Whereas Kate can get a shoe that's as long as her big toe, the rest of them spill over or are cramped in a closed shoe as the toes are simply too long. Freakish. I still like them well enough.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-06 10:19:53Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@tap... don't you have some more of this? It's never enough! Gorgeous!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-19 23:52:29Dingo  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)
Now take a good look at these feet. She can't even find a pair of shoes that fit her feet. Look at those long serpentine toes not even in the shoe! The second last toe is permanently damaged due to stuffing her feet into shoes that don't even fit. She needs to get specially made shoes for her ugly toes. Stop rating on boobs, etc. These feet are shockers. Looking at them for to long would turn a man to stone. Gorgon toes.
 
Reply
Block user
peperssonson  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-31 16:37:04
While I normally disagree with you mate, you're right she's done some damage with the shoes she tries to fit into, and that's messed her feet up some ! So it's always a hair-raising experience when you see new pics ... for the first time ... will they be a set with shoes the right size where the damage doesn't show and her feet look their best ... or will it be another set that just makes you think "Nooooo what are you doing woman ? How can you WALK in shoes like that ... you're going to snap your bleepin' toe .... oooooow !"
Block user
Reply
LittleBigFoot  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2014-09-04 00:41:32
So true. She will one day catch one of those mangled toes and snap it right off. Not nice feet.
Block user
Reply
2014-09-01 15:27:47italianjob  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I love big feet!
 
Reply
Block user
tap  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-01 15:59:48
i understand you...
Block user
Reply
Szel  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-01 17:45:01
And I follow you on this call.
Block user
Reply
2014-07-22 05:01:24footloverlevus  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
episod from Snow Angels
 
Reply
Block user
luvsexyarches  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-01 00:20:51
Her feet look awesome here.
Block user
Reply
119 wall posts left