Gee, I guess I won't say 'I hate kids too.' Only that I had one that I loved & spoiled (now old & married). I hate other people's kids? Oh, well, on-topic: As I said, I hate them IN my babe photos here, but am not concerned about my personal tastes, just "What is the RULE" about them? Guess Eli will have to speak to it. @Pixxxie, not sure you're right, as he *does* have a published rule addressing the issue, we just need clarification. I suspect @Hate is correct, but I want a definitive answer. Or not, and I just will continue to not report ANYTHING ever (except dupes) and let others do it. They certainly had the one jerked from this gallery quickly.
2014-03-16 23:14:43Anonymous Rex (trusted uploader) - rated (beautiful feet)
@Hate "I hate kids and don't have any of my own." *slaps with frozen fish* "If there are children related to me, then of course, I spoil the hell out of them." *hands over a bag of frozen peas for the fish slap*
2014-03-16 23:10:59Mr Hate (trusted uploader) - rated (beautiful feet)
@ BIB60 ...Personally I do not give a flip if there is a child in the photo as long as that child is not barefooted and a celebrity under the age of 17. I think Eli would concur with that but it is his call to make. There is no set rule about children in photos here on wikiFeet. I've uploaded pics in the past that have had 'childrens' (lol) and I have continuously caught grief by other members. So I stopped doing it. Won't be doing it again. Off topic, I hate kids and don't have any of my own. If there are children related to me, then of course, I spoil the hell out of them. Go figure.
@Rex, I agree totally, and Kristin Bell & Dax are beating that drum right now, not the first to do so. However, not asking for a majority opinion, asking for @Creator or someone who *knows* Eli's exact rule & intent so we can enforce the 'letter & spirit' of the rule. As I said, it bugs me to see 'em anywhere on the site also. I won't even repeat what one [former] member said on the old wall about Sandra Bullock's kid in a photo here, but old-timers remember it well, just before Eli pulled the plug.
2014-03-16 21:11:21Anonymous Rex (trusted uploader) - rated (beautiful feet)
If I were a celebrity there is no way in hell I would ever want my child's picture on a site like this. Also most of these celebrity women are in support of instating laws to prevent paparazzi from photographing their children.
As you can see from my 03-10-14 post below, indeed someone *did* report that photo as 'underage.' We've had this 'discussion' before in the distant past (old walls) but for the benefit of the Guild, would *someone* like @Creator, @Hate, @Sterne, or some other old-timer here *please* enlighten us on this topic? I'm given to understand that the 'underage' thing only applies to the celebrity herself, not to any incidental kiddos in the pic; there have been many here onsite that I remember, esp. Jessica Alba, Sandra Bullock, Victoria Beckham, et al with their kids, and now Stacy Ferguson with baby Axl, who have had photos posted here for a long time without being reported and removed; others have had the child/ren in question with the face pixellated out. Are we supposed to report photos with *any* child in the photo? Only girls but not boys? Babies? Pregnant women? I don't really *care* one way or another, although to me a kid in the picture anywhere is even more off-putting than some adult guy. I'm just asking so we all know?