As I see it problem is two fold. Such photographs enjoyed by many foot admirer and that reason site is here. Owner rules say picture alright if shows arch, so should stay. Is not it easy enough to overlook it if you do not like it, but leave for those that enjoy? Even if photographs of all bare feet, will be some like by some people and others like by other people. Cannot we have nice variety for wide audience of admirers? But best reason is rules say picture alright.
2014-03-14 11:41:54Pinchy69 (user)
I'm kin da luke warm on this, but am tending to agree with tuesday and the others that here there is enough foot to appreciate despite the shoe invasion, in keeping with the Normandy theme below. I would also not want to see Tweety's feared floodgates open either. Here I think there's call for one of those parking wardens who ticket those who just even kiss a double yellow or overstay by only a minute....then we should be fine.
These type of shots need to be removed. I understand some people like the arch and that's fine when the whole foot is shown but this is WIKI FEET NOT WIKI SHOES!! By letting this type of pic stand next thing we know we will all be subjected to a ton of shoe shots with no toes shown and barely a foot!! I for 1 don't want to look at a ton of shoe shots!!
@BackInBlack60 sterne is a top uploader, i'm just an occasional contributor (but thx for the appreciation). Nevertheless, and as you well said, most of us enjoy the uploads and the pleasure of discovering new perspectives of our favorite celebs feet...Don´t you think sterne, that this mates deserve our work? You are too important to feel dejected!