Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
yanajaca - 2179
(28.22% reported)
celebs - 1934
(1.91% reported)
toelover143 - 1725
(1.28% reported)
sterne - 1676
(0.84% reported)
Uncle Creepy - 1228
(0.08% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Jennifer Aniston

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 7.5 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (3948 total votes)
2915
beautiful
507
nice
261
ok
97
bad
168
ugly

Rating:
 (gorgeous feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info846 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Jennifer Aniston's feet, also liked:
Ariana Grande
Kristen Stewart (I)
Mila Kunis
Joanna 'JoJo' Levesque
Maria Menounos
Got anymore Jennifer Aniston Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-11-26 18:29:28redfoot  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
same crazy BEUTIFUL toes as Rosalyn Sanchez
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-26 18:17:16dailyhighheels  (user)
WOW
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-26 13:13:40Joshlawrence  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Poor Quality
Can we please stop posting pics like this? There are over 1500 pics of Jen on this site. We don't need to see ones which have 2 toes barely visible under pant leg.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-26 06:58:17TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)
Jennifer Aniston #472576, 472617, 472618 & 473359 is #barefootinpublic ;)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-25 19:40:43Templar97  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
This is more than I can bear!!! :O
 
Reply
Block user
Rushh  (user)2014-11-26 02:04:45
I know Grrrrrrrrr!!!!
Block user
Reply
2014-11-26 01:41:02Joshlawrence  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
This probably isn't Jen.In the movie "Office Space" Her boyfriend thought she was sleeping with his boss. It turned out that he was the "wrong Lumberg"
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-25 19:39:08Templar97  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Flaunt those legs of yours just a bit more, Jenny, and I may have to break into your house with a bottle of Avon lotion and give those beauties a nice rub down!!

;)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-25 13:48:49  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)
Removed: No Feet Showing
It's baaackkkkk!!!! Please report picture first and then refer @Popaczek to admin for immediate dismissal from wikiFeet. How many times is he going to re-upload this picture?
 
Reply
Block user
TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)2014-11-25 17:05:13
Already done & I'll re-report as *NFS* everytime.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-25 17:13:19
I hope I downloaded one of 'em before it got kebabed. Picture number please?
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)2014-11-25 17:32:15
#1524655
Block user
Reply
2014-11-25 13:20:41Rayray  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Feeling pretty jealous of Paul Rudd right about now.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-24 21:08:31Joshlawrence  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: No Feet Showing
C'mon no arches, no toe cleavage. No feet showing. This pic does not belong here
 
Reply
Block user
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)2014-11-24 21:53:10
Picture should be reported NFS. I've used up my report.
Block user
Reply
2014-11-24 21:23:22Family Destroyer  (user)
@joshlawrence: I agree.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-24 00:02:05Soul Collector  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: No Feet Showing
I don't like this "Shoes are O.K. rule". Photo's like this seem kind of pointless!
 
Reply
Block user
GoodtimeJay  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-24 08:06:12
These closed-toe images still strike me as very beautiful, so long as the shoe is sleek and elegant, and the foot is showing a healthy expanse of exposed skin. It's a tease, but an enjoyable one.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-24 08:33:51
That pic, #1522138, was *barely* legal - it only showed a tiny bit of arch.
Block user
Reply
GoodtimeJay  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-24 10:29:11
Now it appears 1522138 got removed even though you could see cleavage on one foot and arch on the other.
Block user
Reply
2014-11-21 16:28:28dinsdag  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
These shoes suit her so extremely well
 
Reply
Block user
SkipperX  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-24 09:32:57
I completely agree with you dinsdag, but Let's face it. With theese beautiful feet any shoes would look marvelous if only one can see her lovely toes...
Block user
Reply
2014-11-24 08:39:15BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Well, the false "NFS" reports are back. Someone cannot tell the difference between a legal arch pic and true "No Feet Showing."

1521357, 1521377, 1522138, 1523545 are perfectly fine and legit pictures for this site, and have been unreported.

1523543, 1522793, 1522988 are truly 'NFS' and have been removed
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-15 21:16:41BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Poor Quality
Awesome find, @TRLB! I'm not sure I've *ever* seen this pic. I was just up about 0400 this morning watching a rerun of "Friends!"
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-24 08:37:20
The removed AWESOME (rare & vintage) picture is here:
http://pics.wikifeet.com/Jennifer-Aniston-Feet-1513090.jpg
Block user
Reply
2014-11-22 02:40:24Joshlawrence  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
This is not a very flattering pic of my dear Jen.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-15 21:06:29Family Destroyer  (user)
Another case of "pretty feet but the face ruins it for me".
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-15 21:44:35
You must be talking about your Avatar of Grik, right? ;)

WOW! You're joking! Unbelievable. I find almost every square inch of this lady beautiful, even still at 45! (YES, I'd give her feet 45 kisses!) In fact, about 40-45 is my preferred age for ladies currently. Maybe just a tad old for you, since you're a young pup! ;)

As for her face, I wouldn't say she's a *stunning* classic beauty, but definitely 'girl-next-door' pretty beauty; fresh, sweet, and all that good stuff.
Block user
Reply
laddishot  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2014-11-15 21:54:37
And I thought her face was just the best part of her. Her bony veiny feet? Naaah.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-15 21:59:12
@FD guess it's one of those different strokes for different folks type of thing I think she is Gorgeous:)
Block user
Reply
TheGoodFootCritic  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-15 22:02:02
I think Jen is rocking the vascularity. Top ten feet for sure.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-15 22:02:29
@FD - the Grik pic must be doing something to your brain, maybe some kind of avatar mind-meld. Jennifer is no gorgeous gal by any means, but she's no slouch either.
Block user
Reply
Family Destroyer  (user)2014-11-21 20:41:13
I just can't bring myself to rate a woman highly if her face is unappealing to me...even if the feet are pristine.
Block user
Reply
2014-11-21 20:39:11dinsdag  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
What do we read here? 37 1/2 ?
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-21 08:23:20DurkDiggler  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: No Feet Showing
WTF is this?
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-21 07:58:41dinsdag  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: No Feet Showing
id. 1521279 I see no feet
 
Reply
Block user
212 wall posts left