@Grik - No honcho, and no desire to be. Just try to help on Guild some and still try to enjoy the feet. Of course I remember @54 before and after. He, you and *I* all have a new day to be discreet (but maybe not to be as *discrete* anymore).
Think I saw one post from a user called "Buster/Transylvania" the other day but probably not same as the old ones we knew. Maybe the fled when the walls fell and don't know that it's troll mating season again.
Back to feet for me, as well. A man's gotta have his priorities straight, right?
@BinB are you some head honcho now? Are you on the Guild? If so, whilst noting (and accepting) some of your criticisms of moi re past endeavours, it appears you never read (or are ignoring) some of 54's past indiscretions (particularly on the site of certain muscly women - remember @54)? I smirk at @54's new found 'nice guy' image.
Accepting i am not as frequent a user as I used to be, I am yet to see any postings by Buster ot Transylvania. Do they continue to exist?
Now, as for her FEET, they are wonderful, and remain pristine into middle age. Also, her face looks strange................it has wrinkles, expression, lines................unbotoxed!!!!!!!!
Unlike certain others of her ilk, she is aging gracefully and doesn't look like she is auditioning for Thunderbirds - The Movie.
2014-02-15 20:52:0654 (user)
2014-02-15 20:42:04sturyo (user)
we may never know
2014-02-15 20:27:2254 (user)
@sturyo Coon never did elaborate. So perhaps he meant both. Dunno.
2014-02-15 20:19:04sturyo (user)
@54 I don't actually have an opinion on the matter. I just thought you and @BackInBlack60 misunderstood what @Coons said. As far as I know, it is indeed not possible to have a JPEG file that shows the bottom part first while it's still downloading.
@BackInBlack60: I agree, new comments should probably be visible to everyone by default.
2014-02-15 18:30:0154 (user)
@sturyo First, I don't know that there is such a thing as images loading from feet to face. Second, I know it's a real bitch to wait on a picture; especially if it's one of those UHQ ones, but it's like BackInBlack60 said about anticipation. Third, I want to see the face and everything else of a girl before thinking about staring at feet.
2014-02-15 16:34:03BackInBlack60 (user)
@Sturyo - OH! That makes sense, and I agree, but somebody's in a pretty big hurry if they can't wait for a picture to load (either direction). I've just gotten to where I sort of enjoy the anticipation! It's almost like a strip-tease or something, waiting for those leg 'n' feet to finally load and be revealed. Rant warning: What's bothering me now is the new comment system. Looks like it takes about three or four approvals to get posted, which is taking two or three DAYS sometimes, depending on the popularity of the gallery. That, combined with 'this feature diabled' on wall post notifications, makes it almost impossible to carry on any sort of cogent conversation here now. And I'm spending literally *hours* now on the guild page, trying to weed through comments to approve, and that's just picking out the celebs I know or follow. Def needs some work. I'm thinking maybe it's set up kinda bass-ackwards now, i.e., maybe all comments should go 'live' without any pre-approval, but Guild members would still have the ability to reject an inappropriate comment (maybe with two thumbs-down votes, similar to the photo reporting feature), and in worst-case scenarios, block the user for repeated offenses. That's pretty much how most bulletin boards & forums work - people post, if there's a problem, the moderators delete the post and warn the member a couple times, then ban 'em on strike three or for a very serious offense. (End of rant)
2014-02-15 16:06:34Toe (user) - rated (nice feet)
@BackInBlack60. LOL! I think most of us remember those days. And all that time for pictures which we now consider thumbnails!
2014-02-15 16:05:34sturyo (user)
I believe @Coons is just referring to the fact that feet tend to be at the bottom end of images. If you click an individual image, you will typically have to wait until almost all of the image has been downloaded until you can see the feet. This can take several seconds depending on the image and connection speed. If images loaded from the bottom up, you'd be able to see the feet pretty much right away.
2014-02-15 15:54:40BackInBlack60 (user)
Agree with @54, and will add that some of the galleries have *thousands* of pics. Those of us who have been here years don't want to revisit old photos to get to the new. I *personally* liked it better when all photos loaded at once rather than 100 at a time, but Eli had to do that primarily to save himself bandwidth costs and secondarily for those without high-speed connections. I remember when I lived way rural and had slow DSL - had to click on a gallery, then go make a sandwich while the page loaded!
2014-02-15 08:57:1154 (user)
@Coons They used to. But then that meant the updates were at the bottom. So there had to be quite a bit of scrolling to find it or them. Every gallery is different. A few galleries have three to five hundred pictures where the nice pictures could be anywhere; Top, bottom, middle. I prefer the updates be at the top. That way time isn't wasted scrolling far down for what turns out to be nothing 50-60% of the time.
2014-02-15 03:34:11Coons (user)
Why don't these images load from the bottom up. There's gotta be a way.