Since pictures from her (IMO) most foot fetish oriented video to date have been removed, I felt that people should check it out, as well as two of the clips that I have uploaded on YT. They are from that same video, but in slomo, since I would like you to share your opinions. The thing is, I am very much into her feet and I fear that I could be biased. While any video that shows her barefoot is welcome, I think that this is serious foot action, and not just random and "innocent" displaying of bare feet like, say, I Should Be So Lucky. Also, the guy looks very excited and it's "only" her foot on his shoulder. What do you guys think? Am I right? Do you find that sexy? I've googled it and it surprises me that it is rarely mentioned in foot fetish threads that discuss Kylie. I think it deserves way more attention!
Has anyone else noticed how Google has removed anything feet related from their search engine's auto-fill? Sometimes you'd only get so far as typing in the first few letters of someone's name, like "K-Y-L", before auto-fill would take over and predict "Kylie Minogue feet". Google has clearly gone out of its way to omit such predictions from the auto-fill function. For example, I just tried typing in "EMMA WATSON FEE-" and it couldn't even predict the final 'T' of feet. It's the same for everyone - though it must be said I've still yet to try for Selena Gomez. Is google protecting people from something it deems tabboo? It's certainly censorship.
Gimme feet (user)2014-11-12 12:32:45
I don't think they completely removed it, but it certainly doesn't come up as often as it used to. Personally I wouldn't call it censorship because the recommended search is a feature that they don't have to implement, and you can still search it fine if you so wish.
Wow, yes, great find and thanks for the upload! The photographer/editor of that photo should be horsewhipped for truncating her feet though!
Another frequent issue with 'the pose' is that some *clueless* photographers do as they were *trained* to do in photography class for portraiture, and open up the aperture of the lens so that the depth of field is narrow, making the 'important' subject of the face clearly in focus while blurring out the 'unimportant' details like FEET! [SMH!] :(
I coudn't agree more! many of her early pictures were ruined by moron who think that a sole could be of no interest to anyone! There are no less than THREE photos from 'I should be so lucky' (very sexy BTW) that could have been PERFECT, had the photographer not been blind! I'll show you-