Welcome to wikiFeet.

Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
DPes - 2075
(25.35% reported)
celebs - 2046
(0.59% reported)
Kawen Mr Jeyt - 1761
(0.45% reported)
Grik - 1617
(4.95% reported)
toelover143 - 1345
(0.15% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Bailey Jay

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 8 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (286 total votes)
188
beautiful
48
nice
15
ok
5
bad
30
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info214 pictures were removed from this gallery.

Got anymore Bailey Jay Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2015-01-21 02:52:33GrassHopperWrestlng  (user)
So was this the work of a rogue mod/admin, or just a run-of-the-mill troll user? If it's the later, would it be a good idea to make it so that only Guild Members of a certain XP level can report photos on an LGBT persons' page so that this crap doesn't happen again?
 
Reply
Block user
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-21 02:58:35
It takes MORE than ONE person to delete comments and pictures. That is a "safety feature" set up with the guild.
But with that being said, there are a LOT of us users who feel trans feet do not belong in a FEMALE feet appreciation site.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-21 03:41:28
@GHW- We have suggested many ideas about picture reporting, but all have been ignored. The Admin said this gallery was taken out by *one* user with multiple accounts and was done in the 'wee hours' (U.S. Time) so no one noticed in time. He suspended all accounts involved, and will restore the photos eventually, he said.
Block user
Reply
mercilesstickler  (user)2015-01-21 03:46:17
its my opinion that trans pictures should be identified for what they are...if i had my way they wouldnt be on here at all...but since they are here i think they should come with a tag
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-21 03:56:48
Agree! I believe a few of the users here have been fooled by transgenders etc appearing here with no tag, and thinking they are on a FEMALE foot fetish site, it never enters their minds they are gawking at a bloke contrived as a woman, and one can only imagine their embarrassment (and I venture to say, anger) when they discover the truth. I actually believe without a tag, the walls are deception and duplicitous, and take users for granted.
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)2015-01-21 04:04:36
Agreed on the tagging. Make it so number one!
Block user
Reply
Templar97  (user)2015-01-21 04:17:09
@Grik- Totally agree. @AJ- It's unfortunate that Captain Piccard will not agree to such a simple and fair compromise.
Block user
Reply
Chappy  (user)2015-01-21 04:19:05
I also agree, it would be nice to know just what gender I'm gawking at as I steadfastly prefer the female form
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-21 05:04:27
@merciless-stickler- I couldn't have said it any better myself, all that you said, but we've fought those battles and lost. We even ran a Guild Poll with overwhelming support for flagging, and those on both sides of the issue supported it, but as @Grik said, it was nixed by Dr. No. So, we try to alert people in each gallery as best we can, and that's about all we can do. "Caveat Emptor." Just like real life.
Block user
Reply
physdude  (user)2015-01-21 06:53:45
So if we are playing the "let's label people game", let's have labels on anyone that is gay, black people, those that have had boob jobs, those that are on drugs etc. Yes Bailey used to be a physical man, but she clearly must feel like a woman hence going through a sex change. She is a woman now so quit your bellyaching. Stop being so against people that are living their lives how they want to live them and being their true selves. Also I have seen the whole "this is a female foot site", where does it say that? On the home page it just says "Celebrity", everywhere else it just says "celebrity". By that I would assume it would be for any famous persons feet. Just stop the hate. With regards to @Grik saying people have been fooled by transgendered people, is that not a good thing as it means that the person in question finally has a body to match their mindset?
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-21 07:04:13
@physdude- I hope you're not talking to me, because I'm not hating on anyone. The only reason we wanted to flag those galleries is because they cause so much trouble, mostly *from* haters who accidentally end up in one of them. But I've thought of that and you are correct; your point is well-taken-- it sort of smacks of tattooed numbers on prisoners of war in the 1930s and 40s.

The problem lies in this rule on the home page:
o We only allow opening galleries for women over 17 who are listed on IMDb.

Some here want to make the case that male-to-female transgender 'women' either are or are not 'real' women. Either way, the site owner has made his defense of them very clear, and *his* definition of "women" is this: A gallery may be opened if the individual identifies *as* as woman and is identified as such on IMDb.
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-21 07:11:44
Physdude, this is what it says: "wikiFeet is a collaborative site for sharing, rating and discussing celebrity feet pictures and videos.
We only allow opening galleries for women over 17 who are listed on IMDb."
All you bleeding hearts pushing your agendas here, please don't selectively quote bits that only suit your agendas. Can you see the word "women"? Now, the significant minority of users here who happily subscribe to transgenders being here, no big deal. But we have many hundreds of new users who have no idea there are transgenders here. If the site was for real, then the above wording would include transgenders, wouldn't it? As for the rest of what you say Physdude, it's a very shallow argument. Most of us believe a woman means a biological woman; not a medically/chemically conjured one (who may or may not have their appendage still affixed). Personally, I don't give a flying fark the BJ galleries are here - I don't agree in pretending the BJ's of this site are biological women. What a total nonsense to suggest it's how they perceive their gender that counts. If that was the test, RuPaul, a complete male, who dresses as a female, would still be kosher here. So would effeminate campy gay men. And I laugh at the warped, deluded irony of expecting political correctness on a foot fetish site. Ha!
Block user
Reply
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 17:25:40
well put sir :D
Block user
Reply
REVAN™  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2015-01-22 17:31:05
@Grik: So damn true.
Where's Danny DeVito's gallery?
He's not more or less a woman than this fine specimen right here! 😏
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-22 17:39:30
What about: Tom Hanks, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Robin Williams, Milton Burle, Don Knotts, Dee Snider, Tim Curry, and many, many more?
Block user
Reply
54  (user)2015-01-22 17:45:08
Freddie Mercury, Bruce Jenner, Oprah (wait...)
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-22 18:13:02
Bruce is a foregone conclusion. He wanted so badly to 'Keep Up With' the rest of the Klan that he's having... changes made. Now apparently confirmed, as they girls all come out in public support of his... adventure/decision.
Block user
Reply
ToothpickTorture  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-22 18:37:48
Forbidden Desires!
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-22 21:45:39
54, credit where credit is due, that was funny! I predict Bruce Jenner will be here soon. What a sad legacy arising out of living with the Kardashians poor Bruce Jenner is. Gone the full circle from Triathlete to Transgender!
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 22:10:44
@Grik - I think it's about time for you to take a Wikifeet holiday. From what I've heard, you've been doing your share of preaching. Enough is enough. We know your opinion on this matter & the fact that you're taking potshots at people who differ in opinion from you is one line crossed too many. Either let people have their opinions or don't come on to THIS particular page.

Either way, you should excuse yourself from here...because it's time. Savvy?
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-22 22:50:03
Darling DP. From "what you've heard" eh?! Chinese whispers exist here, do they? You and Angus privately emailing? You now the self-appointed WikiFeet censor now? I have at all times engaged in honest debate here. I have not belittled anyone, or taken potshots. I've engaged in debate - something you refuse to do. All my comments here have been approved. Have you noticed quite a few here agree with me? What, exactly, is your problem? I'm not the one who maliciously bashed BJ's site up. You are the pontificating preacher here, not me. You pontificate; you do not engage in debate. You refuse to accept any opinion other than your own. Now, if you were in Guild, you will have seen a few days ago that I said I would not be making any further comments here (other than generic ones, like I just did above). Didn't hear that, did you? You did your dandiest to censor me out of existence a year or so ago, cleverly doing your sycophanting best to entice everyone to gang up on me, and when it didn't work, you spit the dummy and depart (for which somehow I still get blamed for, and by the way, a few of your then mates didn't appreciate the way you left them high and dry). Darling DP, get over it!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-22 23:30:48
@Grik- Not me. Only contact I've had with @DP in months has been on these walls & is mostly still here. She's pushing her own barrow. Leave me out of it. I'm gonna go join @Tweety in Switzerland, or take our submarine to Atlantis.
DIVE! DIVE!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-23 08:08:35
I will remind both of you (DP & Grik) that you smoked the peace pipe, and offer my opinion that while Grik continues to stir the pot, he's neither the only nor the worst problem on this particular issue. AND remind him that he stated in GC earlier today that he was 'done' posting on this topic and on this wall, regardless of what anyone else said here.

[DIVE!]
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-23 14:12:41
LOL I just read a forum post at the pad that people someone doesn't like Wikifeet because it has become the "Grik and Backinblack60" Page and a few chiming in about what a terrible person our dear @Mr. Hate is. Couldn't disagree with these creatures opinions more.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-23 14:26:29
@L2 most probably a fellow guilder who for one reason or another doesn't like the 3 mentioned who ever it was I say as you could not disagree more and will have to give a big shout out and Thank-You to them for possibly driving in more people to this site:
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-23 14:28:52
To them I say, "C ya, don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out"
Block user
Reply
Templar97  (user)2015-01-23 14:32:27
As @tweety said, must be disgruntled members.. Maybe @Dingo or @blueballs?? No, wait.. @blueballs subscribed and worshipped only at the alter of LUCAS. ;)
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-23 14:42:37
Thanks guys. this is why I disagree with their sentiments that we are not a real community here.
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-23 14:56:01
I just don't understand why some folks over on the mousepad think I'm such a terrible person. WTF? ????? boo-hoo!!!! LOL!!!
Block user
Reply
Templar97  (user)2015-01-23 14:57:40
We do have an interesting (and fairly complex) community here. Men and women from every corner of the earth who collaborate and unite on one common interest: Lovely female feet.
Block user
Reply
REVAN™  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2015-01-23 15:03:13
@Templar97: "Lovely female feet" - what a lovely thing to post on a *man's* wall, underneath a *man's* gallery. 😉
Block user
Reply
Templar97  (user)2015-01-23 15:14:30
@REVAN- Honestly, I don't pay much attention to the galleries themselves when I'm approving/rejecting comments. I sort of drift through unaware. Either way, I think most people come her for the *real* female feet.
Block user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)2015-01-23 15:21:14
Yes indeed @Temp
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-23 15:36:32
@Mr Hate>"I just don't understand why some folks over on the mousepad think I'm such a terrible person. WTF? ????? boo-hoo!!!! LOL!!!"

1) Seriously, how can you *not* love Mr Hate???
2) Ditto for me, whatever they said, and it sounds familiar.
3) I imagine Grik is crying crocodile tears as well.

@Lawrence2- Thanks, if that also included me and not just Mr Hate!

@T97- Same here on both counts. I only come to these walls to approve comments & don't see the pics much or at all (never enlarged). I'm here for cis-gender, natural-born & bred female feet. But it doesn't both me that we have users who enjoy this, and I can choose to ignore even pending comments here if I wish to avoid the gallery.
Block user
Reply
Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-23 15:46:44
lets stop the BS and drama, the clicks and the manipulation, its not HS. Im here too see the sexy feet and toes if your not maybe you should be somewere else.
Block user
Reply
Pinchy69  (trusted uploader)2015-01-23 15:47:14
A few things stand out to me having read that post.
Firstly I do think it has been (so far at least) been well balanced in its comparative and that there seems to be a consensus among their members that content-wise Wikifeet is very good, which it obviously is. One person (perhaps one of many) states that they come here to see new sets first, BEFORE going to boards and fansites...to me that says it all really, so much so that nothing I read there would so far encourage me to frequent the pad for pics. I have never visited that site that I can remember.
Secondly it must be said that Eli in numerous FC's has said that for him content is king and social interactivity is second, but that he has plans to enhance that aspect here. Perhaps the social side of things there is better than here, I can't say as I don't go there. Once Eli enhances sociability here then let us judge it fairly.
Thirdly, with what I said above re Wikifeet winning the content battle and wondering why that might be, perhaps the answer lies in the fact that many in the Guild, I count myself in here are more critical of loaded content and might try to channel others to upload as best as possible. Some might take that as being domineering or bossy or rude, but listen, we're all big boys and girls here and should look past a criticism if it is leveled and wonder why it was, rather than jump ship and feel that you don't fit in. We are a community here with seemingly more of a quality content driven ethos than the pad IMO. And as for the members that were discussed there (@Hate, @BiB and @Grik) fair play to our boys for being remembered enough to be mentioned, they've all contributed well here, sure they've all had the odd blow-out, big deal, everyone has some time or other, it's good to have characters in your team man.
Lastly, I do agree that Wikifeet isn't perfect *yet*, the restriction on which celebs can be shown here (IMBD-dependency) is my biggest gripe, and again perhaps the pad is better on that front, kudos to them if they are, nonetheless, I am quite happy to sit pretty here.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-23 15:57:09
First of all, @P69... well said on all points.

Since we're discussing it here on a wall, I'll cross-post what I just said in chat:

@Larry- Interesting Thread @the Pad; some valid points made, and also some misinformation/disinformation or people who haven't really been 'inside' here much lately, as the info is outdated.

I'll also add that I found some of the criticisms of Wikifeet to be ones which many former & current Pad users come here and complain about over there, so perhaps it's a bit myopic or even hypocritical (albeit valid on both boards). Neither is perfect by any stretch of the imagination.
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-23 19:58:38
Pinchy, as usual, well thought out and said. I don't go to that other site. I've casually been to a few other sites and WikiFeet, to me, is the superior product. And I think the competition likes to snipe and disparage us to boost their stocks. Ain't gonna work! Finally, I am honoured to be mentioned in the same breath as Angus and Hateness
Block user
Reply
2015-01-22 21:05:09reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Not a single inch of this gorgeous woman isn't perfectly luscious. I just adore her.
 
Reply
Block user
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 22:44:27
i agree reesie! she is just amazing. she is soft and lovely and those feet are impeccable.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-22 17:48:34iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
So i just need to put a black dot on the ladies' privates and were good to go? I see that's how it was handled on all the others. Hey man, just trying to play like everyone else.
 
Reply
Block user
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-22 18:16:00
Then read the site guidelines for uploading.

wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked.

You've been here since Oct. 2011 and never read the guidelines??? And when was the last picture anywhere on this site that had exposed genitalia showing? Watch your uploads!!!
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 18:20:18
Drink:)
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-22 18:20:49
Gonna end up getting the gallery *locked* if he's not careful.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 18:28:58
Eli was supposed to replenish this gallery with the original pics malicious removed so I guess about 2017 the original gallery will appear:)
Block user
Reply
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 18:36:44
fair enough big guy, i promise to follow the guidelines. Man you guys must get paid a ton of money to monitor the hell out of this site, you guys are very good at your job. Batman like reflexes.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-22 18:42:08
And you must get paid a ton of money for uploading adult content on this site.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 18:56:09
only payment I get is GREAT friendships and the ability to enjoy viewing beautiful women and their glorious feet Payment made in full:)
Block user
Reply
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 18:57:56
man, was just paying you compliment on the great work. jeeez! But yah it would be great if i got paid a ton of money to upload porn all day. i wish!
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-22 19:05:40
Then I apologize, it just came across as somewhat sarcastic.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 19:11:02
@ilgf I wasn't taking a swipe at you rather was just saying how I feel Sorry if I offended you did not in any way mean to not me or my style sorry again if I in any way did:)
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-22 22:21:59
NO, NO NO! You guys want HIM here so bad, you can deal with seeing ALL of him. I say keep the picture(s) showing his dick.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-22 16:49:05iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
so when it asks .. is it justified... if you want to keep it to you hit yes or no? its a confusing question... is it justified that there is adult content.. or is it justified that it should be allowed?
 
Reply
Block user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-22 17:22:15
"Justified" means the report to remove the picture is accurate and for a valid reason according to 'Site Guidelines' (see Home Page).

@Kranz- B̶o̶t̶t̶o̶m̶s̶ ̶U̶p̶ CHEERS, dude. And it's even past Noon here. And five o'clock somewhere.

Or at least four-twenty somewhere.
If not everywhere.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-16 06:08:43Mishu777  (user)
Bailey Jay isn't really my cup of tea either. But what good is it really doing to remove galleries when you could just not click on them if you don't like them.

Providing wikifeet is still 99% naturally born females, I can live with a handful of trans women galleries if it makes other people happy.

I'm not the least bit homophobic and totally support LGBT acceptance and feel people should live however they're comfortable. I'm just personally not sexually attracted to men or anyone with or who has had male genitalia. Everyone likes a different flavour though, and that's cool.
 
Reply
Block user
buppa  (user)2015-01-16 06:10:29
well said
Block user
Reply
reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-16 06:12:16
@mishu...thank you for your kind words
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-16 06:27:21
Very well said @M777:)
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-16 06:38:36
I am not a "homophobe" either. I don't care if they get married, adopt children, etc. I am all for it, and will vote in their favor if it comes across the ballot. But I just don't get the trans thing. Why dress as a wolf in sheeps clothing? And a mans feet do not belong here. If he has a penis, he is a man. PERIOD.
Block user
Reply
reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-16 06:43:42
@AJ...I gladly approve your level headed, rational comment. I don't agree and am happy the pics are here. Does this mean we just rabidly disagree, but don't dislike each other?
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-16 06:46:43
@Mishu- Thank you for your level-headed comment. Too many angry haters around here. To address your point, there are just under three dozen trans galleries here that we know of at present, out of just over 32,000, or .1% of them, a tiny percentage. You have a .3% chance of a bowel perforation during a routine colonoscopy, or three times the odds of emergency surgery than from 'lucking into' a trans gallery here. We have implored the Site Owner to at least flag them with a small LGBT flag so they are easily identifiable to those who wish to see them and to them that don't. He refuses to do that and as I understand, considers them legitimately female provided they identify as female and are listed as such on IMDb. That is your best defense... when in doubt, check their IMDb link. I also sometimes publish the list I have made... for them that do and them that don't.
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-16 06:51:52
Flag them as LGBT... FINALLY SOMEONE SAYS SOMETHING SENSIBLE!!!
That I can deal with.
Block user
Reply
reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-16 06:56:13
I'm good with that...common ground
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-16 07:00:27
@reesie87- Also, please rest assured the Site Owner is strongly pro-trans, and the GK's said that he is aware of this and investigating everyone involved (probably including comments). He said that he will restore the gallery in full. If that doesn't happen soon, maybe you could re-upload from your collection. As you know, I have no interest here so have none of these archived, sorry. But I know Eli is working on fixing this problem and we'll remind him at next Fireside Chat if it's not restored by then.
I'm also not going to publish that list again until I'm sure this vandalism/troll issue is fixed.
Block user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-01-16 07:06:08
Although I honestly don't really care whether they're flagged or not myself, it seems like a rational and fair enough conclusion. But meh, if the site owner isn't up for it, it is what it is I guess.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-16 07:11:09
@Mishu- We ran a Guild Poll on the matter I think in May or June, and got overwhelming support from both sides of the issue to do so; I think the final tally was about 87% 'Yes.' During the monthly Fireside Chat right after that, the Site Owner vetoed the idea without explanation, and merely said, "No." Also in Fireside Chat around that time, he presented his defense of why the trans galleries are here to stay, and was quite clear that they will.

That is why I wish people would quit being such jerks about it. It's *his* site and he can allow or disallow whatever the hell he wants, and can ban whomever he wants.
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-17 01:37:52
This Mishu fellow, I like him.

He gets a kiss on the cheek and gets to paint my toenails. :)


But seriously, it's time for Pixxxnaerys Targaryen to come back. This shite needs to STAHP.


#DRACARYS
#FireAndBloodyHeels
#TheFirstLadyOfTheGuildReturns
Block user
Reply
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-20 23:11:01
That's great.. but i think the importance is that she has gorgeous feet regardless! she has nicer feet than half, if not more, of the GG's on here.
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-21 02:57:38
I agree - but that is more a reflection of the very average feet a lot of the 100% genuine women have here!!!!
Block user
Reply
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-22 16:43:46
She's 100% genuine, more genuine than most of the hacks represented on here. She's honest and open and gives two f*cks about what anyone thinks. that's pretty damn genuine.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-18 13:05:47Grik  (user)
Removed: Adult Content
Any mainstream PS does this pose will lead to a kebabing. Welcome to PC WikiFeet. BJ can point his willy at us with impunity, it seems.
 
Reply
Block user
Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-01-18 14:07:04
C'mon @Grik dude....give it a rest and get over it. If you don't like the gallery just don't visit it...SIMPLE! Also I've read further down the wall that you think that the people who are quite rightly angry about the pics being removed are pushing an agenda. That's not so. The way I see it the only people who've pushed an agenda here are the one's who attacked the gallery. Not cool
Block user
Reply
celebs  (user)2015-01-18 14:29:53
Hope to get the gallery back
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-18 14:42:38
@Grik- What @Smoothie said. Only barrow I'm pushing here is one that says, "Vandalism of galleries at Wikifeet will not go unpunished."
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-18 19:29:40
Smoothness, I have gotten into trouble in the past for posting pics like this one of mainstream PS, which Creator kebabs, because the subject, to use his words, is pointing their genitals at us. I said I did not agree with the vandalism of the gallery by the way. I was making the point there appears to be double standards, and why does BJ appear to be in a "walking on eggshells" category when it comes to Kebabing pics otherwise inappropriate here.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-18 19:36:12
Thank goodness Bailey's not literally *pointing*. :-)
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-18 19:48:32
That isn't what I meant by 'putting a flag in these galleries.'
I didn't mean flagpole too.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-18 19:53:30
Then you surely can't run the flag up the staff.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-18 19:56:52
Nor pitch a tent.


Especially in the mornings.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-18 20:09:19
Nothing worse than a flag at half-staff, or a drooping tent.
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-18 23:02:52
Jayzuz you two need flagellation!
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-18 23:04:08
And why hasn't Tweets flagged you two?!?!?!?!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-18 23:05:54
Tweets flags *no one* anymore. Says it doesn't work right.
But TRLB1 made another satisfied customer out of @TT the other night.
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-18 23:08:27
How anyone could show anything short of RESPECT for @ToothpickTorture...after everything he has been through in his life, is beyond me. Sickening actions taken. Makes me sad.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-18 23:13:24
L2 made me MAD:(
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-21 07:13:41
No impunity, it seems! [Gomer Pyle moment!!!]
Block user
Reply
2015-01-20 22:50:05iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
i love this woman. she is gorgeous, sexy , fun , delicious. i would marry her in an instant!
 
Reply
Block user
54  (user)2015-01-20 22:53:18
36 states allow it. Have a blast! lol
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-21 00:16:11

"Never judge a man until you've walked a mile in his pumps."
Block user
Reply
REVAN™  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2015-01-21 00:22:23
Funny, if it wouldn't be so sad.
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-21 01:53:49
He/she whatever isn't even attractive. Especially with that big schnoz! While he was spending all the money for the transformation should have bought a nosejob.
Block user
Reply
ToothpickTorture  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-21 01:55:22
Forbidden Desires!
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-21 02:56:42
And ask the surgeon to throw in a lopjob as well!
Block user
Reply
2015-01-20 23:12:24iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
lol..
People who liked Bailey Jay Feet, also liked:

Olivia Wilde (II)
Kristen Bell (I)
Naomi Watts
Amber Heard
Kaley Cuoco

obviously people have good taste.
 
Reply
Block user
54  (user)2015-01-21 00:45:02
Nobody should read much into all that "People who liked ___ ___'s feet, also liked:" stuff. Case in point: "People who liked Oprah Winfrey's feet also liked: Katy Perry and Kelly Hu." "People who liked June Shannon's feet, also liked: Katy Perry and Alison Brie." "good taste?" Ha!
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-21 02:17:19
More like the automated match program has no taste!
Block user
Reply
2015-01-15 04:36:43tbager  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Her feet are nicer than mine, but my penis is way nicer than his...
 
Reply
Block user
ToothpickTorture  (user)2015-01-15 04:41:31
her a broad with rod?
Block user
Reply
reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-16 05:42:19
@tbager....seriously? if true, what are you doing Saturday night?
Block user
Reply
tbager  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-20 23:05:04
@reesie87,just hangin around...
Block user
Reply
iluvgirlsfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-20 23:09:15
I would disagree.. she has the perfect penis.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-20 23:26:00
@tbager- LMAO. I see what you did there...
Block user
Reply
2015-01-20 14:39:27Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
very sexy
 
Reply
Block user
celebs  (user)2015-01-20 14:44:06
Indeed
Block user
Reply
2015-01-20 07:30:26toelover31  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Adult Content
She may walk on my face anytime....
 
Reply
Block user
54  (user)2015-01-20 07:38:19
She may do more than that. lol
Block user
Reply
2015-01-20 02:41:21newyorkbaby  (user)
SUGGESTED NEW FEATURE - Currently you can block seeing a users submissions in the comment section. Also by clicking on the little heart you can make a celeb one of you favourites.

So it would be equally useful to be able manage the displayed lists by being able to block a celebrity from the results. Whether you like a particular celebrity or not is your business. Without being vulgar or hateful there are celebrities who I am not interested in seeing again for many different reasons.

Perhaps this solution can keep everybody happy, avoiding labelling people, but allowing us to have control over what we see.

And finally, many thanks to the people who run this site.
 
Reply
Block user
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-01-20 02:55:16
YA KNOW THAT WOULD WORK. I DON'T WANT TO BE KNOWN AS A TRANNY BLOCKER BUT THIS IS A GOOD IDEA.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-20 02:55:51
@NYbabe- EXCELLENT idea. If I'm not mistaken, we have suggested some variation of this to the Site Admin (aka @Creator or 'Eli') in the past, but will try to remember to bring it up at the next monthly 'Fireside Chat' with the owner, just as you have proposed it (pointing to your post here). I've sometimes wished I could block Oprah and a few other disgusting galleries.

I see you've been around the site awhile. You are welcome to help run the site by joining the 'Guild' which allows you to approve/reject comments before they become visible to the public, and then 'earning' your way to various site privileges such as being able to post to Guild Chat (500), or post Guild Polls (10,000).
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-20 02:56:34
@Pop- Isn't that something like 'c*ck-blocking?'
(:^p)
Block user
Reply
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-01-20 02:58:32
@BNB WAS GONNA SAY NO: BUT YEAH, OR AS I PREFER..... ADAMS APPLE BLOCKER
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-20 03:01:11
Anti-Shanghai-Surprise button.
Block user
Reply
newyorkbaby  (user)2015-01-20 06:02:12
Thank you to all who have commented.

There does not need to be any reason given for a particular block/filter as specifying this might "label" the celeb. Also that user's reasons are their business, and they may not wish others to make assumptions about them based on who they choose to not to see again. Therefore, whilst other matters re celebs are ranked/have statistics it would be best for this to be merely a user's own filter, and invisible to all others.

This discussion was prompted by the personal circumstances of Bailey Jay. Admin does not wish to "label" whether a celeb has a LGBT or trans status etc. I agree.

However this a broader suggestion which is NOT about a celeb's LGBT/trans status / color, or any other issue. There are simply many celebs who I am not interested in seeing again - they are not my "brand of vodka" as I don't find them attractive, either physically, or personality wise, and/or as I personally don't consider them to be a celeb. I would not wish someone else to try to second guess my reasons, and their guesses will probably be wrong telling us more about them than me.

I feel that a user's own "block" filter would be useful, which while no guarantee of responsible behaviour, might make a few less inclined to remove pics from galleries merely based on their own personal preferences rather than site policy reasons.

Hopefully this filter would result in happier users and less work for Mods, and no offence/hurt being caused to anyone. Thanks
Block user
Reply
2015-01-19 14:13:57smallPotatoes  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
I know what she is and I don't care,sHE's Smoking Hot
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-19 03:24:19DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Thank you, DrumDude.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-17 01:52:45FlipFlopFanatic  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Why do people feel the need to ruin things for other people? Just don't visit the page.
 
Reply
Block user
toeloverforever  (user)2015-01-17 02:09:05
@FFF, that would be to easy. Just seems that a few here
just cant be happy unless they are b*tchin bout something
I've seen it all.... size, nationality, shoes, gender
Block user
Reply
2015-01-16 13:45:38Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Very disappointed to find her pics removed. Thats just Bull Shit!
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-15 07:28:42reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
And again the homophobes rule. I can't believe all the pics disappeared for a second time. There needs to be a failsafe for removing pics here
 
Reply
Block user
toekisser  (user)2015-01-15 07:33:55
True...pics marked for removal should be sent to a seperate sections with only high rated members making the final decision
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-15 07:44:58
Sure they were even here for a second time been here all day and never seen a return of a pic just saying /asking?
Block user
Reply
reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-15 17:04:48
They were back up for a brief time 2 days ago.
Block user
Reply
toekisser  (user)2015-01-16 06:26:15
I miss Bailey's pics....I adore her
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-16 06:43:53
I think you mean HIM.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-15 03:50:42Grik  (user)
It's official, the trolls are NOT running this site
 
Reply
Block user
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)2015-01-15 03:56:49
True that. Common sense needs to run this site. No male feet period. It is a FEMALE foot appreciation site. If it has or has had a penis, it is a MALE.
Block user
Reply
celebs  (user)2015-01-15 04:04:05
No not again, comments, comments and comments with no images at present, let the admin decide abt the images then i think those comments becomes relevant
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-15 05:06:35
LMAO I LOVE WIKIFEET!!!
Block user
Reply
2015-01-12 02:52:22DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
It's official: the trolls are running the site.
 
Reply
Block user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-12 02:53:20
Hey, Pixxxie!

The more things change, the more they stay the same!
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 03:21:27
I. am. so. done.

-_-
Block user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)2015-01-12 03:25:53
Sad to hear that @DP
Block user
Reply
Chappy  (user)2015-01-12 03:54:01
Also don't like to hear that Pixxxie, maybe just take a breather...
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-12 04:25:58
Hello DP.
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 06:15:54
I've been on a breather, @Chappy. This takes the cake. @Creator has let this site go to the wolves. I thought that after the Leelah Alcorn incident, this page would be protected. I guess not.

Bailey Jay is a woman. Full stop. End of discussion.

Newsflash for the arsebandit who nuked this gallery: Amazon Eve is also transgendered.


Here's a quick lesson:

" gender
Syllabification: gen·der
Pronunciation: /ˈjendər  /
Origin
late Middle English: from Old French gendre
(modern genre), based on Latin genus 'birth,
family, nation'. The earliest meanings were 'kind,
sort, genus' and 'type or class of noun,
etc.' (which was also a sense of Latin genu
Usage
The word gender has been used since the 14th
century as a grammatical term, referring to
classes of noun designated as masculine ,
feminine, or neuter in some languages. The sense
‘the state of being male or female’ has also been
used since the 14th century , but this did not
become common until the mid 20th century .
Although the words gender and sex both have the
sense ‘the state of being male or female,’ they are
typically used in slightly different ways: sex tends
to refer to biological differences, while gender
refers to cultural or social ones.


IT'S NOT WHAT'S BETWEEN YOUR LEGS, IT'S WHAT'S BETWEEN YOUR EARS.

Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-12 06:22:27
Male or Female, I'd still scrub them
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 06:36:24
For whatever it's worth I just wrote Eli encouraging him to suspend/ban whoever did this to this page shame as this can occur to any page thus the whole site is under attack and bans and suspensions are needed imminently not a "I'll look into it" type of thing:(
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-12 06:38:13
I'm genuinely curious to know what happened here? How can someone just get rid of a page?
Block user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-01-12 06:51:20
* An important fact.. the pics are not really gone but rather hidden underneath on the site server & upon admin review can be restored again.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 06:58:46
@TRLB1 many already know that the point is the whole gallery gone over night WHY? WHO? and what repercussions will they get if it happened here imagine J Aniston gone in a night or any others I mean WTF:(
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 07:52:09
@tweety - Bans/suspensions don't work. I've seen it first-hand.

I think tighter reigns are needed.



*sigh*


Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 08:00:07
@DP you are indeed right at the very least this is a WAKE UP call to figure out how to ONCE and FOR ALL put an end to SPA accounts if it is even possible:) And as you so eloquently said *sigh* :)
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-12 08:01:56
I still don't understand!!!!! Put the pictures back?!?! Reject the reports? Easy stuff
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-12 08:04:34
@DP Girl, do I have some friends for you in real life. I'm not quite the perv I play on tv. I think Private Messaging should have been the first thing done here.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-12 19:48:15
@DP is correct that bans/suspensions are a no-go and @tweety's idea of putting an end to SPA accounts is not possible because the trolls know the ways around those controls.
The 'tighter reigns' of which @DP speaks are what is needed, and the *only* way to make that happen is either to make reporting non-anonymous or, better, require final confirmation by a GK/TU before a picture is removed. This was proposed to 'Dr. No' - and you'll never guess what the answer was? NO. So there. I guess we would rerun the old poll about it and bring it up *again* next Fireside Chat. To be refused yet again.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-12 19:58:17
@DP- I don't see any Leelah Alcorn gallery here and don't remember any incident about it... was that Wikifeet? What happened?
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-12 23:20:41
@BiB60 - It was a national headline. Google it.

Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-12 23:26:40
Oh, crap! Yeah, I just didn't know the name, but that happened right in my own back yard and has been all over the news here. Sorry I didn't recognize the name, but I definitely knew the story, have heard interviews with friends, etc. Didn't watch GG lasnite but guess they talked about it there too.
Block user
Reply
reesie87  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-13 05:15:27
@bib--son of a gun---in my backyard too. we might be neighbors
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-13 06:03:48
Ok, seeing as certain of us are attempting to ejucate others, whether intelligent or imbecilic, the person described as Bailey Jay is, as I understand it, a 'Transgender". Wikipaedia states thus:

"Transgender is the state of one's gender identity or gender expression not matching one's assigned sex." So, it's not necessarily what is, or used to be, between one's legs at all - it's what they consider themselves to be.

That does not make them a female/woman, for purposes of WikiFeet, in the true senses of those words.

However, they are here as allowed by Creator, and that's it!

Doesn't explain why Ru Paul, a bloke who dresses as a woman, is here though!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-13 06:07:32
Pretty simple: RuPaul is *not* supposed to be here and @Creator promised on 11/1/14 or 12/1/14 to remove that gallery.

OTOH, Bailey Jay *is* supposed to be here (according to the Site Owner, the *only* opinion that really counts here), and will be restored shortly. The user(s) and account(s) who vandalized this gallery have *already* been suspended, so hopefully won't happen to any other galleries, regardless if it's Bailey Jay or Selena Gomez.
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-13 06:14:56
And I had never heard of Leelah Alcorn, or the 'incident', which is probably explained by a) my geographical home; b) the social circles I mix in; c) my blissful ignorance. And, with due respect to all here, I fail to fathom the ado and preening political correctness associated with the BJ gallery. I take WikiFeet to be a foot fetish/appreciation site; not a forum for pushing agendas.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-13 06:20:30
@Grik- And yet, no one pushes more barrows full of agendas here than YOU. I can actually name half a dozen of yours that you push here, even without thinking very hard.

Here ya go. Happened just a few miles from me, literally in my AO:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Leelah_Alcorn
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-13 06:49:14
Angus, I had read that article before I posted above. A tragic event no matter which way its viewed. Although I am Atheist, I feel for the parents and what they are put through because of their religious beliefs, and they lost a son who wanted to be a daughter - and some folk just don't have the intelligence to fathom or accept that. Leelah Alcorn is another statistic, who went public in a tragic way to attempt to educate - in largely conservative America, fat chance! Transgenders don't count for too many votes, do they? Like homosexuals all those years ago, who largely went underground, until their numbers justified political influence. Anyway, I'm not here to papcrap, so I've had my say. And finally, again with all due respect, whether BJ is a 'woman' or not, is a matter of opinion, not fact. Carmen Carera was born a man, but certainly looks like a woman, but she cannot conceive. If I had me some fun with Carmen, does that make me homosexual?!?!? It's all physiological semantics at the end of the day, isn't it?! I don't agree with BJ being here, but I would never actively kebab the gallery. And (now I'm doing more Dame Nelly Melba's than Angus hisself!!!) why hasn't Creator named and shamed those responsible?!
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-01-13 07:02:16
And finally (again), yes, I push barrows full of agendas, but I do it openly, not clandestinely. I say it to everyone's face; I don't form an invisible posse of henchmen to destroy a gallery.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-01-13 07:15:05
@Grik- All well said, I can't add much to what you said, except...

The Alcorn study has a lot of lessons to teach a lot of folks. One of those is that, regardless of your opinion of their 'true' gender or even their life choices, they are *people* nonetheless, and part of the human family. To classify *any* group as sub-human always starts us down a very dark path that has already been trodden too many times before in the history of mankind.
[Cue Martin Niemöller "First they came..." speech]
Block user
Reply
2015-01-13 06:39:41GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
HEY BOY'S AND GIRL'S AND OF COURSE UNDECIDED: I HAVE LONG THOUGHT A DIFFERENT SECTION FOR TRANSGENDER FOLKS WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA.... REGARDLESS REMOVING PICS THAT SOME WANT IS NO LESS THAN AN ATTACK ON THE ART, AND THE HARD WORK OUR LOADERS GO THROUGH TO SUPPLY THIS MEDIUM TO THOSE IN OUR FRACTURED FAMILY THAT APPRECIATE IT.... I AM GLAD TO LEARN THAT THE DAMAGE CAN BE REVERSED.... AND I UNDERSTAND WHY OUR FEARLESS LEADER MAY BE HESITANT TO SECTION OFF CERTAIN ARES.... BUT IF SUCH SEGREGATION DID EXIST THEN THIS KIND OFF ATTACK COULD BE EASILY IDENTIFIED AS A HATE CRIME AND THE ACTOR BANNED FOR GOOD.... HEY MS, PIXXX GOOD TO SEE YOU LOOKIN IN.... LOVE THERE WILL ALWAYS BE TROLLS AND THE SMALL MINDED.... DON'T LET THEM RUN YOU OFF.... HURTS US ALL.... AND THEY WRONGLY TAC UP A MARK IN THE WIN COLUMN
 
Reply
Block user
62 wall posts left