Welcome to wikiFeet.
Last 30 days
|DPes - 2066|
|celebs - 1994|
|Kawen Mr Jeyt - 1814|
|toelover143 - 1628|
|Grik - 1571|
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
Shoe Size: 6.5 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (1523 total votes)
more info226 pictures were removed from this gallery.
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
Rushh (user)2014-11-27 12:43:21
Isnt Zoe the mini one here? .....the tattoo on the top of her foot seems to say. Yes
Templar97 (user)2014-08-20 19:34:35
She was sooooo sexy in Guardians of The Galaxy
toeloverforever (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-20 19:36:54
it is very nice
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-08-20 19:56:44
@T97- I'll try to catch it on DVD, but not a big fan; didn't really like her in Star Treks either but pretty decent in Avatar.
Revenger (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-22 08:23:46
She is sexier in Colombiana. There are some good barefoot scenes in that movie.
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-02 10:45:53
Ciao, fratello@rompicoglioni. Strictly speaking, the pic shloudn't be here, as hate said. But, for Zoe... anything goes and others pay cash!
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-02 10:46:49
Sorry. I've meant the other pic!
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2014-07-23 16:27:55
No toes, no sole, no arch = No Feet Showing.
Rompicoglioni (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-26 06:33:03
I agree with you basis the rules (even if a bit or arch can be seen to be honest), but can i say that this type of close up shows more then a 500x500 full figure picture?
20 wall posts left