@BNB60: TWO REALLY CUTE FILLY'S THERE: Don't know. Guess I can be a bitchy
2014-04-29 03:54:44BackInBlack60 (user)
@GeminiStallion- OK, Pop, so *this* one looks more like you... Not a thoroughbred, can't tell about the 'hangage,' but def looks like a tight little quarterhorse with some ropin' experience, except looks like he/you ended up on the wrong end of the rope with Ms. Fox! But hey, she could ride ME bareback and I wouldn't complain a bit!
2014-04-29 03:54:21BackInBlack60 (user)
@Sterne- Actually, you disagreed with me. I was saying under Eli's verbal guidelines to some of us in the Guild, those pics WERE in fact considered A/C... by him or by site rules. He has said the bottom or side of breasts cannot be showing, although there are many extant pics on the site like that, some for many months/years. I merely said *I* wouldn't report these two, but accurately predicted someone would, and indeed they are gone. But we can still see them using 'fun with URLs' and the pic numbers: #340189 & #738171 And they are *worth* looking up! They were both *very* nice.
@BackInBlack60 : I have some experience in term of AC mistakes, and I agree with you, no AC. 1°)You don't see her nipples,2°)she doesn't have suggestive poses.Moreover, the goal of the picture wasn't to seduce anybody.
2014-04-28 19:51:28BackInBlack60 (user)
Removed: Adult Content
@Warpy- Actually both of those are 'criminal' under site rules. I'm not gonna report #340189 or #738171 as A/C but I know a couple Guilders who will if they see these (they show illegal side-boobage & under-boobage). But there are the numbers if anyone wants to see them after they're gone.