eliccio (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-28 03:03:08
They do look much better in shoes. Although I rated them beautiful I will agree with you.
Levendi (user)2014-11-28 03:11:26
Exactly the reason I (as in my cuz) say that feet should only be rated au natural or in Havaianas, because these things called 'shoes' have a funny/peculiar way of making very average feet appear to be exemplary feet. I sometimes wonder if this is a foot fetish site, or a quasi 'shoe' fetish site (the Jimmy Wah's of WikiFeet).
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-28 03:44:42
@Levendi- I suggest you go look at the Guild poll I posted in your honor and giving you credit for the inspiration. Only a *very* tiny minority want the site to be 'barefoot only' site; a slight few more favor 'barefoot or sandals/flip-flops only' and the *vast* overwhelming majority want the site just as it is, shoes and all. So, YES, in one sense, it is a 'quasi-shoe fetish site,' and as both I and others and your departed friend have tried to explain to you, for many/most foot ̶f̶e̶t̶i̶s̶h̶i̶s̶t̶s̶ aficionados, it's often difficult to discern between the f̶e̶t̶i̶s̶h̶e̶s̶ attraction for feet and the articles which are so closely associated with them, like hose and shoes. Never ceases to amaze me how a man of your education and in your profession can be so freakin' DENSE and without understanding.
johnfkennedy (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-30 06:47:52
Era, actually they ah beautiful
eliccio (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-01 05:21:32
I like feet in all manners, barefoot, in nylons, in heels. The more the merrier. It's like a woman's body. I don't want to just see a woman nude, thigh highs, maybe a nice pair of underwear. It all enhances the beauty.