Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2060
(0.15% reported)
Kawen Mr Jeyt - 1773
(0.34% reported)
Mr Hate - 1593
(1.32% reported)
Pinchy69 - 1467
(1.36% reported)
footmcfeetish - 1204
(10.30% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Kimber James

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: [NOT SET] edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (250 total votes)
156
beautiful
39
nice
24
ok
6
bad
25
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
Skip down to wall ∨
+options
880 x 591id. 984603
+
853 x 1280id. 748960
+
853 x 1280id. 748959
+
400 x 610id. 748829
+
337 x 279id. 747973
+
687 x 1024id. 747971
+
1074 x 1600id. 737392
+
687 x 1024id. 503220
+
853 x 1280id. 472309
+
533 x 800id. 470478
+
665 x 988id. 467243
+
461 x 687id. 467240
+
390 x 594id. 466598
+
687 x 1024id. 466597
+
738 x 1100id. 466596
+
853 x 1280id. 466381
+
672 x 1024id. 465955
+
604 x 900id. 465954
+
604 x 900id. 465953
+
687 x 1024id. 465952
+
687 x 1024id. 465553
+
687 x 1024id. 465551
+
687 x 1024id. 465550
+
687 x 1024id. 465388
+
687 x 1024id. 465387
+
687 x 1024id. 465385
+
687 x 1024id. 465384
+
687 x 1024id. 465382
+
853 x 1280id. 465381
+
687 x 1024id. 463835
+
1280 x 872id. 463833
+
853 x 1280id. 463832
+
853 x 1280id. 463831
+
more info20 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Kimber James's feet, also liked:
Sarah Michelle Gellar
Mila Kunis
Rachel Bilson
Vanessa Hudgens
Adriana Lima
Got anymore Kimber James Feet Pictures? Upload Here
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-04-09 07:09:18pidgeon66  (user)
"Shemale" is offensive outside of pornography and the sex business actually. Within porn, it refers to someone who was born with male genitalia and still has them, but also breasts and other attributes commonly associated with women. KJ probably called herself a shemale at some point, but it's still a word you should avoid using outside your keyword search.

I looked her up, she doesn't have male genitalia, so the word wouldn't apply even within pornography anymore.
 
Block user
2014-04-09 05:30:30GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
TITLES, MONIKERS, PSUEDONYM, NON DE GUERRE, TS,TV,CD. Don't know that I care. Don't know that I need to. My only concern would be full disclosure. Lot of simple types out there, willing to believe. A young man with raging hormones is easy to fool. A PREDATOR COULD TAKE ADVANTAGE. As long as there's full disclosure. Everyone has all the info FINE.
 
Block user
2014-04-09 04:28:06BackInBlack60  (user)
@GHW - Gotta go with @JO on it; 'shemale' isn't offensive, while 'tranny' is like 'n*gger' - offensive when used by an outsider, but sometimes used among friends or as self-deprecating humor.

And by the way, about the only time you'll see me use 'tranny' here is when I'm calling myself one, quoting @Grik (being offensive) because he has frequently said that "any guy / all guys / the *only guys* who talk(s) about shoes are poofs and trannies' so I just roll with it and let him call me what he wants. Not gonna give up a good foot *or* shoe fetish based on someone's insults!
 
Block user
2014-04-09 04:13:49Jay Owen  (user)
"shemale" isn't actually offensive in the community....tranny is, though
 
Block user
2014-04-09 03:55:34GrassHopperWrestlng  (user)
@Jay Owen - If you'd really like to "get to know her" then don't call her a shemale, that's an offensive and demeaning slur (as is "tranny" fyi)
 
Block user
2014-04-09 03:23:34Toe  (user)
@BIB - Thank you. That was the question I was asking.
 
Block user
2014-04-09 02:55:12Jay Owen  (user)
JO aint gonna lie. I rather get to know this gorgeous shemale intimately than mess around with an ugly natural-born female. If that makes me gay, then whatever. JO don't care what you think.
 
Block user
2014-04-09 02:37:04Iluvfeet  (user)
@TRLB - thanks for having my best interest in mind, but I'm good!
 
Block user
2014-04-09 02:35:50BackInBlack60  (user)
Guys, even on the new walls, we had a huge brouhaha about this (yes, on the @Bailey_Jay wall, and *several* others). Some of us had to 'agree to disagree' on what the actual 'gender' of the individual is, whether TV or TS (and pre- or post-op 'in the basement'). I think the 'bottom line' we could all somewhat agree upon was that their IMDb listing is the deciding factor--- if a person is listed as 'female' on IMDb (regardless of their criterion for deciding such), then a page *can* and probably *will* be opened here by someone. We agreed that there are people who will want to view that material, which drives more traffic, which makes more *money* so it's not going away. But some of us felt it'd be nice to have some sort of flag on the page that the gallery has pics of someone not a cisgendered (natural-born) woman. That's not likely to happen, so... caveat emptor. When in doubt, check IMDb (for movie credits like, "Shemales from Space" or whatever), or Google 'em. Or most fun of all, make a comment about how hot 'she' is, then let a fellow Wikifeeter drop a link on you in the comment wall while everyone else snickers knowingly!
(:^p)
 
Block user
2014-04-09 02:20:59TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)
@Iluvfeet bro here ---> http://www.wikifeet.com/Bailey_Jay
 
Block user
2014-04-09 01:59:46Toe  (user)
@Iluvefeet - Or is that "bone in"?
 
Block user
2014-04-09 01:59:10Toe  (user)
This does beg the question of appropriateness of this gallery. Would that make this all adult material? Simply because it deviates from the norm to where I would be inclined to wonder how our sponsors might feel about it.
 
Block user
2014-04-09 01:58:02Iluvfeet  (user)
For some reason, the term boneless comes to mind
 
Block user
2014-04-09 01:54:04Toe  (user)
@BIB - Pretty much.
 
Block user
2014-04-09 01:33:57BackInBlack60  (user)
@Toe- I retracted mine about 'tender boneless breasts' or whatever, but guess I *could've* left it... after all, they're artificially hormone-enhanced, just like the ones at the grocery!
 
Block user
2014-04-09 00:36:48Toe  (user)
Too late to take it back. It's whatever. I stand by bottom roast. :)
 
Block user
2014-04-08 23:18:21TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Alright for the record s/he's beautiful ♥ ∞
 
Block user
2014-04-08 23:00:45BackInBlack60  (user)
@54- Nope, I didn't look 'it' up, sadly. Guess I can't sing "Won't Be Fooled Again," huh? Funny I was just making jokes about my own "transition to pink" in Guild Chat (my username turned pink today for a milestone) and said I hoped it didn't involve hormone injections and cutting off things I enjoy having and might need later! Guess this one decided 'those things' were unneeded and/or unwanted. Yikes. While I don't want to get into a 'thing' about this topic again, and don't really object to the galleries being here for those interested, I still think some 'fair warning' somewhere would be nice for those of us who *aren't* but not sure how @Creator would accomplish that. Maybe a field up by size for... never mind. Gonna get myself in trouble if I don't just shut up now. 'Nuff said, but *thanks* @54 for the 'heads-up' and I obviously retracted my previous comment! LOL.
 
Block user
2014-04-08 22:54:25Iluvfeet  (user)
@54 - thanks for the info.
 
Block user
2014-04-08 22:49:0054  (user)
It's still a he. And I hope they were kidding.
 
Block user
11 wall posts left