Feet rating stats (198 total votes)
128
beautiful
beautiful
39
nice
nice
25
ok
ok
5
bad
bad
1
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info1 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Sonia Ammar's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-01-29 07:02:05 That is one beautiful woman. Those feet are just perfect. Ankles, heels, soles, arches and toes.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-12-14 16:49:37 Wow so beautiful!
|
|
2020-05-27 12:59:46 barbara palvin is on the right, the girl on the left I dont know
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-05-27 13:06:54 Estella Boersma on the left
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-05-27 13:15:56 @babajaga thank you
|
|
2019-12-28 18:00:33 not on my screen
|
|
2020-05-27 13:00:49 I think the same, I prefer Sonia to the other girl
|
|
2020-05-27 13:00:01 so nice!
|
|
2016-02-27 15:05:02 Which makes her 17 years and 8 days old
|
|
2016-02-27 15:33:08 Thanks for bringing more ephebophiles to the board with you!
Wikifeet appreciates it. Strong the site is with them, yes. ~Yoda |
|
2016-02-27 16:58:18 i'm just approving comments (marshawn Lynch voice)
But honestly, i don't care for having them on here under 18. It just doesnt sit well with me. |
|
2016-02-27 17:52:15 The site rule is 17, and until *someone* stuck their n00b nose into it, required waiting until January 1 following to have galleries here, which either made them *almost* 18 or allowed plenty of time for "Age 17+" pics to surface before populating the gallery. And it only happened once each year, on January 1, so we figured on about 30 days or so of non-stop Underage research & reports. Now, it'll be a year-round task. Sweet.
Even someone 24 is, in my opinion and from personal experience with my only daughter, WAY TOO DAMN OLD to be perving on 17-year-olds. I actually know a guy who went to jail for statutory rape and is a registered sex offender, thanks to the father of the girl, as she was still 17 but her boyfriend had his 18th birthday (sad case there, really). Me? I just wanted to go clean out a boys' dorm with a shotgun. |
|
2016-02-27 18:00:35 @BiB - the nOOb doesn't care as long as he can pad his stats. He'll leave the clean up to everyone else. What a tool!
|
|
2016-02-27 18:04:55 WTF? I didn't name any names. Guess the guilty dog barks first and loudest.
|
|
2016-02-27 18:24:32 As long as the celeb is 17 yrs. and 1 min. he'll be ready to upload. Gotta pad those stats!
|
|
2016-02-27 18:45:28 @BiB my feelings exactly ... And my daughter is only 7 ...
|
|
2016-02-27 18:59:52 @Inspector Sockpuppet aka Visualizer> "Come on dude, can you stop with these personal attacks all the time? (I'm going to retract this as i never even wanted to reply but i am forced to defend myself yet again). It's bordering harassment, i'm not bothering you, so don't bother me. Thanks."
>"Guess the guilty dog barks first and loudest..." ...then scampers off with his tail between his legs, yelping like a little bitch when the pack of Big Dogs come 'round droppin' some Truth all up in here. You wouldn't be having to defend yourself if you were doing nothing wrong. Harassment? So sue us. Get your slimy attorney buddy to help you. |
|
2016-02-27 19:16:40 @BIB - The most frightened dog barks first. And they should be scared.
|
|
2016-02-28 22:34:14 Iluvfeet (guild knight)2016-02-27 18:24:32 "As long as the celeb is 17 yrs. and 1 min. he'll be eady to upload. Gotta pad those stats!" If this is a Guild Knight showing leadership here, with a totally inept comment like this, little more than a personal attack on our second best uploader, and a comment from someone who never uploads, then hand your badge in
|
|
2016-02-28 22:41:41 I assume all Vizzy was pointing out was she is not 17 as at 1-1-16 and therefore couldn't get here until 1-1-17. The personal attack on the walls by 2 Guild Knights is bully-boy tactics and rather juvenile. And, these 2 tough guys have uploaded, between them, about 15 pics in their lifetime here.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2016-02-28 22:49:54 No dumbass. He was pointing out that *he* wrote the Admin to *now* admit 17-year-olds the day they turn 17, rather than the previous long-standing 'January 1' rule. He went around half a dozen GK/TUs who *told* him that and told him *why* it was that way, and wrote Eli to get it changes so teenagers can have galleries *even earlier* now on this perverted sh*thole.
@ILF *has* uploaded, and *does.* I've seen 'em. |
|
2016-02-28 22:59:54 All hail Eli and Bella Thorne/Ariel Winter galleries when they just turned 17.
|
|
2016-02-29 00:11:01 I've seen what they do to "those" guys in prison. (Cat growls and walks away).
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2016-02-29 00:11:05 @Grik>"...on our second best uploader,"
As *you* are so fond of saying, "Quantity does not equal Quality." Being #2 on 30-day list because of Kohler uploads of dozens of pics of an event when Eli said "six or eight is plenty, ten is too many," and other stat-padding does NOT a good uploader make. Our "Second best uploader" was and still is @Sterne, who was driven from the site by reporting trolls (and he *still* has them despite being gone!) @Grik>"And, these 2 tough guys have uploaded, between them, about 15 pics in their lifetime here." If you're including me, my 30-day is triple digits and my lifetime is quadruple digits and I don't mean 'just barely.' Pretty sure @ILF is *way* over 15 all by himself too, possibly even on 30-day. |
