Feet rating stats (3500 total votes)
2483
beautiful
beautiful
613
nice
nice
310
ok
ok
58
bad
bad
36
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info103 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Rachel McAdams's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-09-25 15:45:23 There are good shots of her feet in the film โAre You There God? itโs me, Margaret โ
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-07-23 23:50:42 Meh.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-07-10 21:42:46 McSock lol ... and a McPleasant view
|
|
2024-05-12 11:33:42 Some of my favorite arches!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-05-12 11:47:44 They're intensely alluring for sure...
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-09-15 16:14:19 She needs a wikiass...
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-04-30 05:52:42 Yes.
And Wikilegs, and Wikieyes, and Wikismiles, andโฆ |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-02-13 13:46:00 woe love her beautiful toes ๐๐
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-01-19 17:52:40 Beautiful ๐ Another great set of arches
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-01-10 19:51:26 Site rules #3
All pictures must show the celebrity's arch(es), sole(s) or toe(s) without opaque shoes and socks. |
|
2024-01-10 20:12:19 Her arch is being shown without being covered by opaque shoes or socks.
Are you mistaking the "or" for an "and"? |
|
2024-01-14 20:34:07 I guess you're not competent in electronics, programming or using spreadsheets. The word "or" means only one of the conditions needs to be met to apply whereas "and" requires all. Her left arch is visible without the shoe obscuring it. She isn't wearing socks either so OR logic would permit this image to be used.
This quotation of the rules isn't your hottest take. |
|
2024-01-10 19:03:33 You just don't like arches.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-01-10 19:51:52 All pictures must show the celebrity's arch(es), sole(s) or toe(s) without opaque shoes and socks.
|
|
2024-01-10 20:12:32 @barefootlover Her arch is being shown without being covered by opaque shoes or socks.
Are you mistaking the "or" for an "and"? |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-01-11 10:25:51 The rule does not say withou being covered...it says without. Does reading and interpretation elude you? This site is NOT a shoe site period!! I've been here 13 years going on 14 years. Back in the day when Eli actually cared to weigh in. Tiffany thiessen page would have three times the number of pictures because I used to post everything she ever put up even with heels and clogs and flats showing toe cleavage and they were ALL deemed NO FEET SHOWING.
|
|
2024-01-11 13:28:42 Well unless we can see her arch in the pic, itโs probably no good ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
|
|
2024-01-11 13:42:30 @barefootlover I'm afraid you'll have to convince a mod (older than you, because you care about it), that we should delete all close-up of toes poking out of opaque footwear, such as flip flops, so he can give your reporting privileges back. Have fun!
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-01-11 15:17:05 Yeah, not to mention that interpretation would rule out all peep toe pics as well, would it not? I mean, I personally hate peep toes, but that's me.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2019-03-08 16:06:37 Nice feet. Four stars. Spoiled by the two squigglers and a peep from Dr. Morton.
|
|
2019-03-19 12:50:46 I like them too.
|
|
2019-06-25 17:59:32 Women with Mortonโs Toe make excellent bedfellows.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-06-12 16:27:19 Morton's toe? My god, SMH. Such shallow, delusional people on this site. She is one of the most beautiful people on Earth and yet people think they can judge her. I almost feel like the rating system on this site is pointless. Everybody likes different stuff. The ratings are not that accurate because of it.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2021-07-02 00:46:23 @SmileyMagician Yet... you ranked her anyway, right? ๐
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2021-07-02 01:46:18 I'm just amused by the language, "squigglers"... LOL, otherwise no need for anyone to take any stray comment so seriously.
|
|
2021-08-23 06:46:40 @SmileyMagician people like you make me feel ashamed of liking feet, out of all the things u can gatekeep this bothers u. eughhh
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-09-01 18:58:01 Rachel can't get a break. Some say she has bunions, squigglers, and mortons. They're pretty sexy though...wish we had more pics of her in those shoes...
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-09 01:24:44 @SmileyMagician You acknowledge that rating feet is purely subjective and in the eye of the beholder ("Everybody liked different stuff") and in the very next breath you say "The ratings are not that accurate because of it", which is a total contradiction. The fact is that the ratings can only be 100% accurate, precisely because they are purely subjective. You having a differing opinion about a rating does not make that rating inaccurate. As for my own personal subjective rating of Rachel McAdams' feet, I give her a 100% accurate 4 because while they are very nice they are also a bit beefy and she very rarely paints her toenails.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-09 01:33:10 Months later, I'm still hunting "squigglers" -- haha
|
|
2022-07-06 03:48:38 Ofc people are shallow on this site thats used to rate women on looks...
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-07-23 18:03:36 @SmileyMagician You can't seriously be accusing anyone of being shallow on a website solely (no pun intended) dedicated to rating women's feet, right? Because that would be ridiculous, so there's no way you're doing that. As driver008 said, the very fact that the site aggregates purely subjective ratings from whoever rates them is what gives them legitimacy. It's why the heavy-hitters like Emma Stone and others of her level have 5-stars rated in an overwhelming majority of cases. I definitely think McAdams have 5-star feet now, but I'm seeing hints of potential bunions (due to how her big toes are starting to turn into her other toes), but the toes are lovely, the arches are beautiful, and the veins are the cherry on top.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-10-06 01:25:44 Congrats to those who are courteous enough to explain why they have deducted stars.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-01-05 17:07:24 Frankly, I rate however the hell I want. Our entire lives are spent rating things, including people, and anyone who argues differently is being disingenuous. How or why we chose to rate things the way we do is not always easy to define, and is mostly subjective. People like and dislike things for a myriad of reasons, none of which anyone else has control over. That being said, I can appreciate someone having a different viewpoint and belief, as it just might inform my future decision making process. Maybe. Probably not. Her feet are a 4 - because I said so, lol.
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2023-10-03 10:55:57 Here's some toe cleavage to celebrate Mean Girls Appreciation Day. Don't question it, just believe it.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-10-03 11:19:31 A high arch reveals the instep sole, and the elevated top confirms it.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-11-17 15:28:41 Just enough of toes and arch showing to get the imagination reeling. Nice!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-11-17 15:51:27 I agree with Jim.
|
