Feet rating stats (1161 total votes)
796
beautiful
beautiful
244
nice
nice
99
ok
ok
14
bad
bad
8
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info25 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Phoebe Cates's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-12-06 14:25:16 well I suggest you get some glasses
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-12-06 14:40:21 I never understood the strange urge to apologize for one's opinion/rating. At least in my case, I don't really give a flying fig newton as to any one person's rating out of hundreds or thousands. When people give reasons or point out factors they see (whether real or false), then it gets more interesting or it might be something to think about or talk about. But if one just says "sorry to all", it suggests to me that one really thinks their rating is really important to all of us, when, in reality here, it's less than one in a thousand votes.
|
|
2024-12-06 15:09:28 Probably cause quite often people get attacked for liking/not liking someone's feet here
|
|
2024-12-06 15:32:56 ZorroZ hasn't been a member of this forum for very long. After two years, he too will understand that ratings are absolutely meaningless.
|
|
2024-03-23 07:13:45 The great song for her unforgettable scene was Moving in Stereo.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-11-02 16:47:14 A true highlight of the 1980’s.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-11-02 18:52:53 Definitely
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-07-23 22:43:59 One of the most beautiful women I've ever laid my eyes on
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-07-29 17:30:34 I agree with this comment.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-10-23 20:00:00 Very nice!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-09-16 11:04:20 She's probably somebody's only light... Gonna shine tonight ... Yeah, she's probably somebody's baby, alright
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-09-16 11:13:44 In her heyday of Fast Times at Ridgemont High, she was as gorgeous as any woman alive.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-09-17 08:39:14 Looking at her more recent photos, she still is. Even when she appears with younger celebs, she outshines them.
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2022-09-16 04:18:17 Too splayed . . .
|
|
2022-09-16 02:15:22 This goddess is nothing short of incredible! And those feet may as well be a crown. I'd swim across the Pacific Ocean with a 100 pound weight tied to my member, then walk across the Sahrah Desert without a drop of water barefoot while juggling chainsaws for just a 1/10,000 chance to touch her left big toe for a half-second.
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2020-04-24 03:35:38 Everyone, these feet are just OK.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-04-24 08:19:23 Good luck trying to convince people of that.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-07-26 16:33:01 He can't help himself. Always spamming his opinion as the one that matters most.
|
|
2021-09-15 11:39:34 If these rate as only "okay",...i GOTTA know what you rate as a perfect 5 (going by this website's rating system)
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2021-12-28 13:58:07 I agree. Don't get me wrong, she's gorgeous, especially in her prime, but her feet are not her best feature.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-05-30 19:06:23 You're wrong. Not everybody likes size 5 feet smattered with bright red nail polish. Go away
|
|
2022-05-30 19:17:17 This really isn't fair. When I saw the pool scene in Fast Times At Ridgemont High in the 80's, it was all over. She's 5 Stars in my book forever....
|
|
2022-05-30 19:40:18 I am unsure how to rate women like this since they were wonderful in their time, but not so much now that they are 60ish.
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2022-05-30 20:22:18 You know, you Guys have to rate what you see. You are correct that she really is a 2 to 3.5 on the rating scale and I'm pulling her down to a 3 for my rating for current day. She's still a HOTTIE in my book forever....
|
|
2021-07-31 02:10:19 It's the TV Version of Fast Times at Ridgemont High, which was included on the recent Criterion Blu-ray release.
|
|
2021-07-31 02:24:00 Thank you.
|
|
2021-07-31 05:05:52 Thanks! It seems there are 14 min deleted scenes in total according to http://www.theuncool.com/films/fast-times-at-ridgemont-high/fast-times-tv-version/
But in the bluray release, there is a 10g tv version 95 min, while the original version is 90 min. Did you find this in that 95 min one (file name 00306), or from a different file? |
|
2021-07-31 20:28:31 The 95 min one.
|
|
2021-04-28 12:03:12 How in the literal hell did Kevin Cline ever rate high enough to wed this beautiful woman????
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2021-07-31 02:13:37 He was a much bigger "star" than she ever was. Don't hate, he was smart to snare this one
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-08-26 18:44:23 I'm going to guess, "Bodies, Rest & Motion". Simply because I see Tim Roth, and that's the only movie that popped up when I googled them both.
|
