Feet rating stats (64 total votes)
29
beautiful
beautiful
18
nice
nice
11
ok
ok
2
bad
bad
4
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (nice feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info4 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Pamelyn Ferdin's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
Reported: Adult Content
2018-07-23 17:10:28 The lady seems to be tied up at the moment but she does have lovely feet.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-08-28 21:11:24 I thought these type of pics were AC ?
|
|
2019-08-28 21:32:39 J
|
|
2019-08-28 21:38:48 Yeah see, this is what I was talking about on the Sammi Hanratty board. From what the more "strict" users were saying, the context of the movie doesn't matter as much as what the picture itself shows at face value. Under that logic wouldn't the pictures that were reported be acceptable but not this one or the others in the gallery? What about all the other pics like this of girls tied up for whatever reason in other galleries that are most definitely NOT reported. That's also not to mention that the whole "someone being tied up" thing counts as AC is something I literally just heard of today and personally never saw reported before that. I'm personally not gonna report it but, who knows what'll happen.....despite what anyone says the whole ruling on AC is most definitely NOT clear or consistent.
|
|
2019-08-28 21:40:13 Lol, and now they're reported. Well, there goes more pics for no good reason....keep up the good work guys......
|
|
2019-08-28 21:42:35 They are AC it's just that nobody knew or wanted to report.
|
|
2019-08-28 21:50:57 bondage is considered as AC.
|
|
2019-08-28 21:55:44 Really?
|
|
2019-08-28 21:58:01 And like fair enough. I mean even if I disagree, it's definitely something I only ever heard of today. I have most definitely seen lots of other pics of girls tied up or whatever that didn't get reported. Upon checking the rules on AC it just says "Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content". That's preeeeetty vague. Are violent or gorey pictures "edgy"? Are the gorey pics in Drew Barrymore's gallery from the show "Santa Clarita Diet" considered "edgy"? Is the implication that "fake gore" is acceptable but not implied or fake bondage? What's a "suggestive pose"? Is cleavage suggestive? Again, I get that rules are rules and in the end it's not my site. But I'm just kinda making discussion here.
|
|
2019-08-28 22:04:43 I've brought up these same arguments in other galleries and I get "The rules on AC are very clear", or some variation thereof. They aren't clear. I gave up trying to figure it out because it all depends on the mood of someone looking at the gallery. The vagueness of the "rule" as written leads to this type of nonsense.
|
|
2019-08-28 22:06:50 Lol yep, 100% Aldorann. Sadly I've seen the whole "the rules are clear" argument on a lot of sites with unclear rules. I mean literally the direct quote from the actual site rules on this site regarding AC are "Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content". Lol, in what world is that clear?
|
|
2019-08-28 22:14:17 Well unless I've missed a bunch of changes recently. Ya'll have a lot of work to do cause I've definitely seen it in a bunch of other galleries over the years and only today ever heard about it being AC. Might anyone have a link to the more concise rules regarding AC, cause the ones under "site rules" are definitely vague. Like where are people getting this info? I'm not denying it's in the "unspoken rules" of the site, I'd just like to know where people are finding it ot.
|
|
2019-08-28 22:57:27 "For several years (since early 2014) it has been "Any BDSM activities in any context is considered A/C." That includes mainstream stars in mainstream movies/TV. I know that seems ridiculous when talking about a guy with a top hat and handlebar mustache in a silent film tying the helpless damsel to the railroad tracks, but it's more a 'zero tolerance' thing to avoid ambiguity, where less knowledgable uploaders don't see it one place (like Laura Vanervort from Jigsaw or Katy Perry's album cover) and then think it's all right here anyplace (like Pop bitching about Bettie Page pics being removed)." - BackInBlack60
|
|
2019-08-28 23:05:59 Fair enough, it is what it is. It's just a shame those rules aren't actually pointed out on the actual "site rules".
|
|
2019-08-28 23:06:45 The point is that that isn't written in the site rules section. Any new member ought to be able to read the site rules and know everything they need to know about uploading, commenting etc.
|
|
Reported: Adult Content
2017-06-16 19:01:49 These are from The Toolbox Murders (1978). When I was a kid Pamelyn seemed to be in about every other show I watched on reruns and several live-action Saturday morning shows. It was 1977's Saturday morning show Space Academy that really made me fall for her.
|
|
2018-02-01 03:48:29 I liked her, too. Thanks for uploading these photos.
|
|
2019-05-16 00:58:50 Yep, Space Academy. When I was 11 I thought she was the prettiest girl on earth.
|
