Ingrid Andress
Go to IMDb page
Feet rating stats (114 total votes)
45
beautiful
beautiful
34
nice
nice
22
ok
ok
8
bad
bad
5
ugly
ugly
Rating: | (nice feet) |
You Rated: | (click to rate) |
Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts |
Gallery Settings
People who liked Ingrid Andress's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
2023-04-03 11:55:27 Damn, what a shame. Came here hoping to be blown away, only to get smacked in the face with those bunions. Sad.
|
User rated ★★(bad feet)
|
2023-04-03 13:18:44 I was struggling to not give her 1 star. These are veiny, boney, bunion bearers.
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2020-08-17 16:44:17 Strange things going on? It seems some photos I've uploaded (not just in this gallery but others mostly )in better quality have been flagged as duplicates rather than flagging the older, worse quality ones adequately.
It hasn't necessarily happened in this gallery, but in several others it definitely has happened. Do members here object to better quality versions and prefer to keep lower quality images? Sounds kind of disincentive to what I thought we did here. |
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2020-08-17 16:48:37 Also I could have sworn I have uploaded some pics to some galleries, which ultimately ended up getting removed while the exact same ones were then re-uploaded. Sure I sometimes zoom but only if there is very little quality loss, along with any enhancements I may put in. The point is we are generally after better quality images, right? So I didn't think slight enhancements were given the boot while poorer quality, farther away-ish shots are preferred. For specific examples look at my post and the Eugenia Cooney gallery, where I had posted a better quality version of the very first uploaded pic and it was flagged as a duplicate even though it was closer up and enhanced/more clear without looking artificial/highly edited.
|
2020-08-17 16:54:10 Never zoom. Always upload originals, originals are preferred, no zooming, upscaling, cropping and the like.
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2020-08-17 16:59:04 So it's preferred to have a worse quality image than one that looks with more clarity? I didn't know that -- thought we sought after upscaling (as in darker images; blurry images; etc.) as long as it doesn't look completely artificial/fake.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-08-17 17:02:21 it's preferred having the original pics, and original caps from original video with original resolution. we're not on your personal facebook or tumblr here
|
2020-08-17 17:15:34 @Foot Hunter If that's how they were posted, yes, no enhancements.
|
2020-03-23 22:50:54 I'm sad. It looks like she's got bunions. Her feet look pretty good from some angles, but other times the bunions look kinda' bad. 😢😢😢
|
2020-03-23 23:04:17 An actual "shoes off" barefoot close up from the top will tell you. From these so far, one can only surmise. Of course I'm a bit suspicious when not one pic emerges that way for a current youngish woman though.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-10-06 16:49:49 Nice barefoot shot to start the video.
https://youtu.be/jQKgb4Vqp68 |