Gunner (user)2014-12-09 07:47:49
Trusted uploader or not, why throw the insults?
joker999 (trusted uploader) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-09 07:51:25
Believe me they deserve it. Most of the vets here know it's not directed towards them. Me and a lot of users are just sick of people who don't read the site rules marking our pics as No Feet Showing.
Grik (user)2014-12-09 07:56:40
Here's my take on it - picture a babe at the beach. Now, if she's wearing a one-piece swimsuit, it's akin to wearing this footwear to the right (meaning, you have to use your imagination a whole lot more). Wearing this footwear with peep toes is akin to wearing a bikini. Wearing flipflops or thongs is akin to being topless. Barefeet = nude. This pic is within the sites rules. And, more to the point, joker999 is a TU, and he wasn't insulting anyone in particular. His comment was out of frustration. Gunner's reaction doesn't help matters. Can we all just have a laugh and move on. Next?!?!?!
celebs (user)2014-12-09 08:03:16
Gunner! TU are not insulting anyone, but just reminding to adhere on the rule and i agree with J999
Kranz (user)2015-04-04 03:21:23
@AJ= Sour puss.
feets of strength (user)2015-04-04 03:23:56
It's not Wikitoe or Wikisole either, it meets the criteria, some of us would like the criteria to be wider, some narrower and wish for only barefoot shots. The frustration is when you take the time to upload a pic that meets site guidelines and it gets reported or worse yet removed
Kranz (user)2015-04-04 03:29:03
I know guys here who love pics like this so it doesn't bother as much, however, this is borderline according to those who are curious about what the subjects feet actually look like.