Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-26 22:53:43
One of her best shots, IMHO!
MalenaMorgan (user) - rated (ugly feet)2015-03-01 14:53:27
With all due respect, your opinion is laughable! XD
GEMINISTALLION74 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-01 14:57:37
EPIC FEET LET ME AT'EM
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-01 18:26:02
@malena... what is a laughable opinion, with due respect, as well? (:-D)
MalenaMorgan (user) - rated (ugly feet)2015-03-01 19:31:30
My inside tip would be Google.
Unable to understand the simplest remarks? ➡ Explore the Internet!
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-01 21:01:14
Thanks. I don't google, I Yandex instead. Anyway, your message was inconsistent. "Due respect" and "laughable" are not a perfect match. Two possibilities: 1) "With due respect, your opinion is questionable" (this one is good). 2) "Without respect, your opinion is laughable" (nasty one). Now... which one do you prefer? (if any).
GEMINISTALLION74 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-01 21:17:12
SO IT'S AN OPINION YOU BE WANTIN THEN. WELL HERE TIS. THIS BONNIE LASS'S BEAUTY WOULD OVER SHADOW THE BLOOM OF A NEW ROSE, THE GREEN OF THE LEE, AND THE SIGHT OF A RESTING SWAN. HER FEET WHEN IN PROPER FOCUS ARE SHAPELY AND TO BE DESIRED. A FULL HEEL SOFT SOLE AND INVITING ARRAY OF TOES AWAITS THE MAN WHO IS NO FAINT OF HEART. I WILL TAKE THIS CHALLENGE.
MalenaMorgan (user) - rated (ugly feet)2015-03-01 21:21:27
@Szel: I hate to inform you "with all due respect" used on the net means the exact opposite. It's called sarcasm. 😉
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-02 10:52:02
MulierPedes (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-02 22:01:22
@Szel: Tnx, bro.
MulierPedes (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-02 22:42:46
The taste and predilection are personal, you have yours and I have mine (So obvious, right?). You may regret; You can do ironies; You may want to discuss other people's tastes; Or you can even pouting and more. You just can not change the opinion of others. Or you can, but the other will have to agree (even if it is just to please you).
This here is a hobby (At least for me!). Then: Live and let live.
@Malena, my dear, this is your opinion and I sincerely respect. You can be sure of it
Curves (user)2015-03-02 23:06:22
I have another take on squaring "due respect" with "laughable". 1) They're not necessarily incompatible. One can laugh at another's opinion without intending to disrespect them. It might just be that uncontrollably humorous. 2) Even if one does mean disrespect by the laughter, the statement must then be taken to imply that they believe the other is not due any respect.
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-03 09:17:38
You are VERY welcome, @Mulier. Count on me! What I find most intriguing is the fact that, in a site intended for amusement, so many arguments arise. I mean: Some take more pleasure in scorning beautiful women or offending other members, than in praising their own preferences. Beats me! Anyway, what you said is well balanced. KUDOS!
MulierPedes (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-03 22:35:42
And we go ahead, Szel. There are many beautiful things to appreciate. Thanks²
MulierPedes (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-03 22:41:17
@Curves: Yes, bro. And I can not disagree with you. The life is open to several interpretations, incluse for the wrong. Thx.
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-04 09:27:20
Incidentally, you love arches too, huh?
@curves... you're right! "They're not necessarily incompatible"!! Swell! But in this very case...used to dissimulate sarcasm... it was of ulmost disrespec (towards a fine member). Why doing this? We are on the same wave length!!Thanks!
Curves (user)2015-04-02 03:15:28
And I wasn't trying to take any sides, just an attempt at some pedantic humor. :)
@Szel: curves are where it's at, and the arch is the biggest part of a foot's curves. The heel also plays a big part, to me.
Szel (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-02 19:15:06
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy."
Got it, @curves. I did not mean to be pedantic, but there are certain attitudes I can't understand, speccially when I read the rule "The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.