laddishot (user)2016-01-29 13:41:37
It's probably the link to an adult site what he had in mind when reporting?
ringoquads (user) - rated (ok feet)2016-01-29 13:51:43
Who reported that as AD? Don't worry @offendedidiot, your testicles will descend one day
davetrimble (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2016-01-29 14:17:57
Mind you this pic has been here for 3 years, I always laugh when some idiot thinks that their opinion is right instead of the hundreds or thousands that have seen it over 3 years and had no problem with it
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-01-29 14:18:37
Based on his comments there, Eli probably *would* consider this A/C for one or two major reasons (like he and the advertisers are stuck in 1952). I don't report much of anything, unless it's genuine 21st-century A/C, but we have several 'usual suspects' who do, and most of us know who they are.
All you can do is what you did... unreport it if you disagree.
Then of course, call it out and then flame-n-shame the reporter like this. Yeah.
Oh, Dave, don't make me post Eli's letter to Greycat again. It's on Franciely's wall. But...
davetrimble (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2016-01-29 14:32:29
The person who reported this was not Eli nor has this person or any of seen some letter to Graycat so with that in mind there is no way any normal person who sees this would think this is A/C( you included as u just stated)so again it begs the question I posed, if 3 years of people thought it is fine why would someone(who is clearly wrong) think they know better than all these people who have seen it and report it. In addition if we did stick to Elis take and this is A/C 95% of the PS pics on this site would have to go. I have posted much worse pics of a list Hollywood celebs in bikinis then this pic is
GEMINISTALLION74 (user)2016-01-30 19:44:52
I DONT SEE IT ?
davetrimble (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2016-01-30 19:58:25
Not this one, the one in the thread below, if u look at the pic it is here in comments but not in the gallery, why was it reported to begin with?
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-01-30 20:33:51
As for why anyone but Eli would report it... well, you can figure that out. Either they have the same repressed 1950s mentality as Eli's advertisers, want to 'suck up to the boss,' and/or have some warped sense of superhero power and purpose in saving the free world from nudity and prurient interests.
@Dave- As I said in chat, I can see about *three* reasons why Eli would consider this 'A/C' in his world. 1) Focuses more on ass or 'sex' than feet 2) Almost fully nude & 'suggestive pose' and 3) Porn Star, which trumps any 'borderline' issues on #1 & #2.
Elway (user)2016-01-30 21:05:50
Plus she's a PS. I don't know why Eli just doesn't ban porn stars from this site. Of course, if he did I wouldn't have been introduced to Mia Malkova, Piper Perri, and Viola Paige. And that has made me a much better person
Inspector (user)2016-01-30 21:09:32
Abiding by stict porn stars rules is better then no porn stars
Grik (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2016-01-30 21:09:49
The pics been here 3 years eh?!?! Just like a Term bearing 3 Capital Letters been here 2 years?!
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-01-30 21:33:27
@Elway - Others have suggested *segregating* the PS (and trans) galleries, but that would require some hellacious coding effort here, or the creation of a couple of new websites or 'sub-sites' (like sub-Reddits).
It just ain't practical to do that, and banning them altogether would lose money and, admittedly, a bunch of really hot feet that as you and others have observed seem to have *really* good feet, as a general rule.
Agree with @Inspector. I personally hate most PSs, but it makes great sense from a business/money standpoint for Eli to include anyone he can, from mainstream to extras, to 'stars' of YouTube channels and video shorts (like "Foot Fetish Party" which is resonsible for about 50 nice galleries here including Dani Feet) from porn stars to trann... uh (@Pixxxie)... "Trans-Genedered individuals" because each has its audience/fanboys and it'll all just increase his audience here (therefore his income).