Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2508
(2.95% reported)
Grik - 2090
(10.43% reported)
Shanghai Red - 924
(0.32% reported)
feets of strength - 835
(2.75% reported)
Mr Hate - 798
(1.50% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Zendaya

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 8 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (497 total votes)
328
beautiful
79
nice
54
ok
15
bad
21
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info211 pictures were removed from this gallery.

Got anymore Zendaya Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-10-03 13:55:02anthonysmith73  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
thats the stupidest hat!!!
 
Reply
Block user
Anonymous Rex  (trusted uploader)2014-10-03 17:48:31
She looks like an air hockey striker.
Block user
Reply
Pinchy69  (trusted uploader)2014-10-03 17:52:08
It is honestly the most ridiculous hat I've seen, and its about 1/3 of her height to boot...bowler me down Ms Coleman, 'tis a good thing you don't get invited to Irish weddings, you'd be a complete blockout with that contraption on.
Block user
Reply
Toe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-03 17:53:26
She looks very phallic standing there.
Block user
Reply
Pinchy69  (trusted uploader)2014-10-03 17:55:50
Now if Miley wore that hat, her feet would look better, anything would have to look better than the hat.
Block user
Reply
Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (ok feet)2014-10-03 18:09:54
It makes me feel like taking a dump when I see that commode on her head.
Block user
Reply
joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-10-03 20:22:51
LOL
Block user
Reply
2014-10-02 18:30:48idiot756  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
They're alright, but there's just something missing. I don't know what it is. Maybe with the right color nail polish...?
 
Reply
Block user
2014-10-01 12:42:22Huntington246  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
They're not terrible, but her toes are oddly lined up.

Not ugly. Not adorable. Just okay.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-09-27 15:28:32glammerella  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Most younger women like to wear high heels. Personally I don't see what the big deal is, not to mention wearing high heels for a long time will do severe damage to a woman's feet.
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-09-27 16:37:15
I keep posting this, but SO WHAT??? THEY like them. Heels make legs look longer, cause the buttock to protrude, and cause a sexier gait. Girls wear them to look nicer and get attention, whether of men, other women, or for their own self-esteem/self-image. They're very sexy and MANY men love them. Why do you think most pr0n has semi-nude or nude girls, but *usually* in high heels? Severe damage? SO WHAT? Cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, high-fat/high-cholesterol foods, automobile travel, cell phones and pretty much everything else does severe damage over the long haul, but people still do those things. Life is dangerous; no one gets out alive. I'm *sick* of people coming her slamming heels and trying to keep women barefoot (and pregnant?) or worse, wearing Birkies all the time. </rant>
Block user
Reply
Templar97  (user)2014-09-27 16:55:55
@BIB60- High heels are OK and usually add to the overall sexiness of a lady's feet, legs and ass (As you said).. But it's good to take them off and walk around barefoot once in a while. The human foot was designed to walk on uneven surfaces, and have direct exposure to things like grass and dirt. Stay away from rocks, though.. Ouch!
Block user
Reply
laddishot  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2014-09-27 18:07:41
@glammerella Yeah, I'm with you, high heels are aweful, said that some times before, no further discussion needed.
Block user
Reply
tweety  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-27 18:17:05
@laddishot "different strokes for different folks" NOW "no further discussion needed" leave others alone to enjoy as they leave you alone to enjoy :)
Block user
Reply
laddishot  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2014-09-27 18:31:48
@tweety As said BackInBlack60 and I discussed this some times before (high heels and nail polish is a strong topic on both of us as it seems), should we run in circles? I leave it to you and others to go on with that topic here, no offense meant.
Block user
Reply
tweety  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-27 18:41:56
@laddishot no offense taken and I didn't mean to offend you either was "just saying" :) No more comments from me on this subject :)
Block user
Reply
2014-08-03 03:53:10BackInBlack60  (user)
@davetrimble- Yeah, hella good one too! #1315303 Hot Loubies with ankle straps and spike on the toes? Doesn't get much better!-->

#1347542 is/was cute, too.
 
Reply
Block user
therevanchist  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-03 20:04:23
The heels are amazing. Not much of the foot can be seen though. The pic is up for a while now, and me too would never vote for its deletion.
Block user
Reply
needsweetfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-27 18:33:30
@ BiB60 ... Such pics as # 1347542 i also find very, very hot !!!
Block user
Reply
2014-09-27 10:26:04needsweetfeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Oh, i love this girl for wearing strappy heels and this funny hat! She's gorgeous and has lovely feet !!!

★★☆★★ ♥♥♥

Great Thanks@ Mr.Hate for these amazing HQ pics.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-22 00:44:53therevanchist  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
The shoes are horrible. What's inside of them is among the very best on wikiFeet however! BTW when did Zendaya lose her gorgeous rank? That is a crime!!!
 
Reply
Block user
balloonis  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-28 22:51:34
I like those heels!!
She's really tall to begin with and then she wears 6 inch heels!!!
That's hot!!!
Block user
Reply
2014-08-23 19:17:51therevanchist  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Zendaya owns the most amazing collection of high heels.

This pair is my favorite →

Yes, I remember this ain't wikiShoes. Yet her taste in footwear is so extraordinary she deserves a compliment for that.
 
Reply
Block user
balloonis  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-28 22:50:24
Those pink heels are really sexy!!!
Block user
Reply
2014-08-23 19:37:55BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
@Revan- Agree 100%. I don't even like *her* that much, but she's got quite the collection of heels, and there's nothing I love more in a woman. WikiShoe *rules!* (Actually that domain was for sale last time I checked...)



Well, there is *one* thing I love more in a woman! ;)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-07 10:39:42littlewill  (user)
On the home page it says females must be over 17 and on the picture reporting it says no one under 17... which one is it?
 
Reply
Block user
maxpower  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-23 07:38:16
As long as they're 17 or older, they can be on here, so she's old enough.
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-23 07:57:38
Actually there is an unwritten rule that a gallery cannot be opened until January 1 *after* their 17th birthday, the logic being that if a gallery opened right after the birthday, most or all available photos would still be 'underage.'
Block user
Reply
2014-08-21 12:40:30Dingo  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
Just OK .....
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-16 11:28:13jebb  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Fun fact: Insteps and arches are part of the foot too. Feet not only consist of soles and toes.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-03 03:55:34doublederp  (user)
@davetrimble actually you can see either toes or archs in those pics, I don't like it anymore than you do but thems the rules
 
Reply
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)2014-08-03 05:44:24
@davetrimble & @doublederp- What I've *never* figured out is... so you don't like it? It's a thumbnail (toenail?) photo! So don't click on a shoe shot, keep moving your eyes and mouse to the ones you *do* like and click to enlarge *those.* But why the need to report a photo another user here really, really loves? We all share the site, the server and the bandwidth, and need to respect that tastes vary. I don't like about 90% of the pictures on the site... so I scan the galleries for the ones I *do* like, but *leave* the rest for someone else with differing tastes. Isn't that the essence of a 'collaborative wiki website???'
Block user
Reply
davetrimble  (user)2014-08-03 05:55:11
@bib u could therefore make that argument for everything u guys argue about in the guild, don't like tranny galleries ? Avoid them, don't like pics with little kids in em? Don't click on em, that is not an answer to any problem on this site, if it doesn't belong it shouldn't be here
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-08-03 06:09:06
We *have* made that argument about trans galleries, especially since @Creator (the site *owner*) says he 'appreciates' them and they aren't going anywhere, I still think a warning would be nice, but he says NO (emphatically) and it is his site. I *do* see your point, and I'm not talking about extending that argument to A/C, underage, tiny PQ pics, etc., only 'legal' pics, which as @doublederp said, these are... the three you singled out were, IMO, 'legal' arch shots, allowed under the site guidelines, and there are a bunch of us (like me) who *really* get off on arches, at least as much as toes or soles.

I'll agree that (1347542) is *right on the line* in that it shows no real arch on the back foot, and only some toe cleavage on the front foot. But to *me* it's still hot. I'd understand if that one got yanked for NFS though.
Block user
Reply
Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (ok feet)2014-08-03 06:13:28
@davetrimble who used to give me grief for uploading HQ over your MQ pictures. You acted like I had a personal vendetta against you. Remember? I assure you Eli and I do.
Block user
Reply
davetrimble  (user)2014-08-03 17:20:08
@hate, wtf r u talking about? A personal vendetta? Trust me I don't sit around thinking about u, ever. We r talking about no feet showing and u reply "who used to give me grief for uploading HQ over your MQ pictures. You acted like I had a personal vendetta against you. Remember? I assure you Eli and I do" what an earth r u talking about and what does it have to do with this discussion? And u and Eli do? Am I supposed to be scared the wikifeet mafia is coming for me lol? I am an upstanding member of this site who has never been suspended, admonished or even received and email about any behavior of mine on this site
Block user
Reply
Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (ok feet)2014-08-03 17:54:11
Okay @davetremble. Whatever you say. You sure do repeat a lot. Is that a gift or are you just being obnoxious?
Block user
Reply
davetrimble  (user)2014-08-03 18:08:35
LOL U r calling someone OBNOXIOUS lol?! And there was another nasty comment u made that I was waiting to reply to but its not here, did u erase it? Something about being done with me or something
Block user
Reply
doublederp  (user)2014-08-03 19:45:51
@bib i dont report those pictures, i know there allowed to be here, i was just sharing my opinion is all
Block user
Reply
BackInBlack60  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-03 19:51:19
@DD- Understand; response was mainly @Dave but included you as you'd expressed opinion on those photos as well. Agree with @TRLB that especially once discussion drifts from specific photos of this celeb, let's take it to Guild Chat. 'Nuff said.
Block user
Reply
davetrimble  (user)2014-08-03 19:57:47
I find it interesting that it is me that the bring it to the guild chat remark was made but zero to the person who took it off topic to begin with and continued it with personal insults which he has since deleted, if u read it back u will see no one was talking to or about him but he felt it was necessary to come attack me for no reason and saying stuff that had nothing to do with topic we were discussing but I guess everyone else on here is afraid of him
Block user
Reply
2014-08-03 03:42:47davetrimble  (user)
etc
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-03 03:42:05davetrimble  (user)
more
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-03 03:41:29davetrimble  (user)
This has been a gray area for some but I'm sorry, this is no feet showing and this page is filled with them, this is a high heel pic
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-07 12:41:48ptbc  (user)
And I see people are already going though and unreporting the underage pictures reported. Glad to see the new reporting system fixed everything...
 
Reply
Block user
TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)2014-07-07 20:53:10
@PTBC bro please specify through the exact pic # which are underage so I can re-report them for automatic deletion.
Block user
Reply
TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)2014-07-08 02:51:22
And they're all gone now ;)
Block user
Reply
2014-07-07 12:35:00ptbc  (user)
@Kawen Just did a little searching and found most of the pictures here are from before she was 17. Reported all the ones I could comfirm were taken before she was of age.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-07 10:52:10Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (ok feet)
@littlewill....No one under the age of 17 is allowed or, must be 17 or older.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-07-07 10:51:27Kawen Mr Jeyt  (user)
Removed: Underage
Pics of this event are from April 2013, before she was 17.

Do not aprove/reject. Only report for cleaning


There may be more events like this, before Sep. 2013. Careful.
 
Reply
Block user
37 wall posts left