Welcome to wikiFeet.

Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
ToothpickTorture - 3521
(0.99% reported)
celebs - 2812
(0.43% reported)
toelover143 - 1514
(0.26% reported)
Shanghai Red - 1342
(0.15% reported)
Grik - 1271
(7.55% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Stefanie Scott (II)

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 8 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (344 total votes)
236
beautiful
51
nice
41
ok
12
bad
4
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info145 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Stefanie Scott's feet, also liked:
Kylie Minogue
Lucy Hale (II)
Katharine McPhee (I)
Irina Shayk
Shay Mitchell
Got anymore Stefanie Scott Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2015-07-01 05:05:13Fudbeak  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Amazingly sexy arch.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-27 00:45:42hifi  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Cute young lady with cute feet.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-26 01:44:54joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (nice feet)
Lots of foot shots of her in Insidious: Chapter 3. ;) I would of capped a couple but I deleted da flik.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-06 03:14:19balloonis  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Very nice!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-05-14 22:47:28floot1234  (user)
2nd trailer more feet scenes towards the end
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-05-14 22:46:10floot1234  (user)
Pretty feet
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-23 02:33:48whitehorse76  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
thanks for the larger upload. such an amazing beautiful young woman
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-13 19:55:56joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (ok feet)
Very nice.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-13 13:29:17Pinchy69  (trusted uploader)
#1662966/7

#arch #archcloseup
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-06 22:18:39balloonis  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
I'm not really sure why, but this pic gets me excited!!
I think it's the way she is posing her foot and the sexy heels that she has on!!!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-03-15 00:30:32Lacepage  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Underage
Cute.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-15 00:41:39
She was born in December 1996 & these pics are from an awards show in March 2013.
Blacklist user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-15 01:14:29
We know @lace. Perhaps admin will identify the kiddie pervs who unreport such pics.
Blacklist user
Reply
holland25  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-28 14:33:04
Well, I wouldn't call them kiddie pervs... She was 16 on those, so not really a kid anymore. Still underage though.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-28 15:12:49
@holland25> OK. How about ephebophiliacs and hebephiliacs?


Satisfied now?
Blacklist user
Reply
holland25  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-29 08:08:40
Thanks for teaching me something new, never knew those words existed :)
Blacklist user
Reply
THE KEEPER  (user)2015-03-29 08:17:58
@Holland. He likes to use them a lot. Makes you wonder why he knows those words.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-03-12 03:58:17Lacepage  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Fake / Wrong Person
Yeah, not steph but smhow I dont care....
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-12 04:05:00
Confirmed as wp.
Blacklist user
Reply
joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-03-12 04:21:56
Those sandals event pics are all under age.
Blacklist user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-14 21:27:58
And new pics are ua.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-03-11 04:48:16Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
i cANT take my eyes off her feet.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-01-05 03:28:58  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)
Credit to the first source http://instagram.com/p/o6kqRpM7-P/?modal=true #1562668 certified as overage legit.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2014-12-19 17:10:39jcvc  (user)
She turned 17 in 2013 so anything from this year is cool
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2014-12-19 02:42:21Lacepage  (user)
More please
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2014-11-07 20:32:49idiot756  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
Seems like there should be a lot more pics here.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
54  (user)2014-11-07 21:36:36
Seems like, yeah. But all there is
Are the ones of her where she's 16.
Blacklist user
Reply
2014-03-19 03:41:36ssmarty  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
She has such perfect feet.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
ptbc  (user)2014-07-27 08:01:09
Who is that in your profile pic? It looks like the feet of a 10yo child or something. I hope not, 'cause that's just wrong.
Blacklist user
Reply
the dog of feet  (user)2014-08-11 09:38:51
Those feet look pretty darn small. It's hard to picture those on a 17 year old. That, and when you have a strong foot fetish, your brain develops the ability to tell the age of the girl through her feet. The small size is most noticeable, but look a bit closer. Those feet have no marks, lines or blemishes whatsoever, and they don't even have any sun tan on them, pure white, like they belong to a toddler. Even a 17 year old with great feet would have some marks and lines and tan on them, it's natural. These are too young and small to be seen here. I'd estimate these to be a 5 year old girls feet, and those have no place here.
Blacklist user
Reply
joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-11 10:00:46
if the case not cool.
Blacklist user
Reply
2014-08-11 09:24:57the dog of feet  (user)
I'm glad to see the gallery is unlocked. Now it's up to Stefanie to kick her shoes off once in a while to add to this page.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2014-06-13 04:13:07saleembagazar  (user)
I think you should consider to moderate the uploads before showing them on the site, in order to prevent nude or underage pictures. People who are willing and able to select the right pictures cannot upload only because some "newbie" did it wrong. This way the galleries become uncomplete and outdated.
We (feet lovers) want to give to this fantastic site our contribution, but some is good doing it, some not. That's why this site, imo, needs a moderation on the uploading part. To me doesn't matter if I upload the picture today and it will appear tomorrow, just let every woman have her own gallery here. ;)

For example: Megan Montaner's gallery is locked and empty. She is not a pornstar, but just a spanish actress. Wikifeet has pornstar's galleries (such Sasha Grey for example) but does not have "normal" actresses gallery... is that right?

Just my two cents. ;)
 
Reply
Blacklist user
ptbc  (user)2014-07-27 07:53:46
Have to agree. I don't think you should make it so that no one is able to upload content to a legitimate celeb's page just because a few members didn't follow the rules.

Like you said, maybe they should make it so any new pictures are sent to a review team that's been pre-selected by the site admin to ensure the photos are within the rules of the site before the pictures are uploaded, rather than just locking the section entirely.
Blacklist user
Reply
23 wall posts left