Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2486
(2.98% reported)
Grik - 2072
(9.85% reported)
Shanghai Red - 880
(0.23% reported)
feets of strength - 835
(2.75% reported)
Mr Hate - 796
(1.63% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Stefanie Scott (II)

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 6 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (149 total votes)
94
beautiful
31
nice
17
ok
5
bad
2
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info89 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Stefanie Scott's feet, also liked:
Joanna 'JoJo' Levesque
Sophia Bush
Rita Ora
Kirsten Dunst
Jessica Lowndes
Got anymore Stefanie Scott Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-03-19 03:41:36ssmarty  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
She has such perfect feet.
 
Reply
Block user
ptbc  (user)2014-07-27 08:01:09
Who is that in your profile pic? It looks like the feet of a 10yo child or something. I hope not, 'cause that's just wrong.
Block user
Reply
the dog of feet  (user)2014-08-11 09:38:51
Those feet look pretty darn small. It's hard to picture those on a 17 year old. That, and when you have a strong foot fetish, your brain develops the ability to tell the age of the girl through her feet. The small size is most noticeable, but look a bit closer. Those feet have no marks, lines or blemishes whatsoever, and they don't even have any sun tan on them, pure white, like they belong to a toddler. Even a 17 year old with great feet would have some marks and lines and tan on them, it's natural. These are too young and small to be seen here. I'd estimate these to be a 5 year old girls feet, and those have no place here.
Block user
Reply
joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-08-11 10:00:46
if the case not cool.
Block user
Reply
2014-08-11 09:24:57the dog of feet  (user)
I'm glad to see the gallery is unlocked. Now it's up to Stefanie to kick her shoes off once in a while to add to this page.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-06-13 04:13:07saleembagazar  (user)
I think you should consider to moderate the uploads before showing them on the site, in order to prevent nude or underage pictures. People who are willing and able to select the right pictures cannot upload only because some "newbie" did it wrong. This way the galleries become uncomplete and outdated.
We (feet lovers) want to give to this fantastic site our contribution, but some is good doing it, some not. That's why this site, imo, needs a moderation on the uploading part. To me doesn't matter if I upload the picture today and it will appear tomorrow, just let every woman have her own gallery here. ;)

For example: Megan Montaner's gallery is locked and empty. She is not a pornstar, but just a spanish actress. Wikifeet has pornstar's galleries (such Sasha Grey for example) but does not have "normal" actresses gallery... is that right?

Just my two cents. ;)
 
Reply
Block user
ptbc  (user)2014-07-27 07:53:46
Have to agree. I don't think you should make it so that no one is able to upload content to a legitimate celeb's page just because a few members didn't follow the rules.

Like you said, maybe they should make it so any new pictures are sent to a review team that's been pre-selected by the site admin to ensure the photos are within the rules of the site before the pictures are uploaded, rather than just locking the section entirely.
Block user
Reply
2014-07-27 07:39:47ej_mtv  (user)
89 pictures removed?! i wish i have seen those!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-06-09 19:16:58joker999  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (nice feet)
Only 1 pic from this event? Sad. It looks like she has a nice paint job going.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-06-09 05:50:48LoverOfLOngToes2  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
You could just make a PublicFeet page for her as an alternative, since the rules there are much more relaxed than on here.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-04-27 10:35:03the dog of feet  (user)
Because some airhead was posting pics of her feet before she turned 17. (bleep) things all up on this page. Now it's locked, and who knows when it will be unlocked. Her chance on Wikifeet has been ruined. All we have now are these pics, with her feet in shoes, that cover up too much for my taste.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-04-27 09:04:32Dman414  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
she is 17 years old. That is legal in most states. Why were her pics removed?
 
Reply
Block user
2014-03-19 04:44:28M. Shadows  (user)
If this gallery is locked it means locked to those who have underage pictures of her. Those who have pictures of her where she's of age, they may try to contribute.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-03-01 17:59:34Jay Owen  (user)
This is the first time I've ever seen a non-pornstar's gallery locked on here.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-26 23:04:34Kronvict  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Noo!! I was too late to save em before they were taken down :-(
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-21 23:31:09BackInBlack60  (user)
@Hate - yeah, I get that. As I said in another wall, "Eli's site, Eli's rules - and I value the site enough to abide by the rules." 'Nuff said.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-21 22:52:06Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@ Angus...Hey buddy, I just follow the site guidelines when it comes to uploading pictures. Until Eli tells me to let things slide I will continue doing what I'm doing. Reporting underage. He locked a gallery just yesterday for people adding underage pics to it much like he does any other gallery when people start adding nude pics. Yep, locked them up and swallowed the key. lol!!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-21 21:12:07BackInBlack60  (user)
Again, this really isn't my battle because I'm pretty much only interested in those 30+ (women, not girls), and just came here to clear pending comments, but I don't get all the fuss over this issue. The site is, according to its founder, not an 'adult-oriented' site, and the age of consent in all of Canada and about half the U.S. is 16, not 18; much younger than that (sadly) in other parts of the world where it can go as low as 12. Just sayin'...
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-21 04:23:48LoverOfLOngToes2  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Shame they're all going to get taken down. Some really nice stuff on here. Oh well.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-20 22:58:56TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)
Sir All Reported As "Underage": I Am Logging Off To Monitor Their True Status.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-20 22:37:24Mr Hate  (trusted uploader)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
After I researched all of the above pics again, none of them are age 17. Final answer.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-20 06:22:52TheRealLoverBoy1  (user)
I Agree @FeetFirst: @MrHate Operates According To The Rules For Years & Others Must Too Until The Rules Change & Preferably To 15.

The Problem Is Which Pictures Here Are Underage? They Appear All The Same & I Must Know Exactly Before Reporting Them.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-19 23:06:53LoverOfLOngToes2  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Cute feet. Total sandal queen.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-02-19 04:46:59meoauniaea  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Such beautiful feet.
 
Reply
Block user
7 wall posts left