Who is that in your profile pic? It looks like the feet of a 10yo child or something. I hope not, 'cause that's just wrong.
the dog of feet (user)2014-08-11 09:38:51
Those feet look pretty darn small. It's hard to picture those on a 17 year old. That, and when you have a strong foot fetish, your brain develops the ability to tell the age of the girl through her feet. The small size is most noticeable, but look a bit closer. Those feet have no marks, lines or blemishes whatsoever, and they don't even have any sun tan on them, pure white, like they belong to a toddler. Even a 17 year old with great feet would have some marks and lines and tan on them, it's natural. These are too young and small to be seen here. I'd estimate these to be a 5 year old girls feet, and those have no place here.
I'm glad to see the gallery is unlocked. Now it's up to Stefanie to kick her shoes off once in a while to add to this page.
2014-06-13 04:13:07saleembagazar (user)
I think you should consider to moderate the uploads before showing them on the site, in order to prevent nude or underage pictures. People who are willing and able to select the right pictures cannot upload only because some "newbie" did it wrong. This way the galleries become uncomplete and outdated. We (feet lovers) want to give to this fantastic site our contribution, but some is good doing it, some not. That's why this site, imo, needs a moderation on the uploading part. To me doesn't matter if I upload the picture today and it will appear tomorrow, just let every woman have her own gallery here. ;)
For example: Megan Montaner's gallery is locked and empty. She is not a pornstar, but just a spanish actress. Wikifeet has pornstar's galleries (such Sasha Grey for example) but does not have "normal" actresses gallery... is that right?
Just my two cents. ;)
ptbc (user)2014-07-27 07:53:46
Have to agree. I don't think you should make it so that no one is able to upload content to a legitimate celeb's page just because a few members didn't follow the rules.
Like you said, maybe they should make it so any new pictures are sent to a review team that's been pre-selected by the site admin to ensure the photos are within the rules of the site before the pictures are uploaded, rather than just locking the section entirely.
You could just make a PublicFeet page for her as an alternative, since the rules there are much more relaxed than on here.
2014-04-27 10:35:03the dog of feet (user)
Because some airhead was posting pics of her feet before she turned 17. (bleep) things all up on this page. Now it's locked, and who knows when it will be unlocked. Her chance on Wikifeet has been ruined. All we have now are these pics, with her feet in shoes, that cover up too much for my taste.