Elway (user)2015-06-28 22:43:43
No soles, no toes, no arches, no picture.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-06-28 23:49:20
See 'Site Guidelines' link on home page.
>"All uploaded pictures must show toes, soles or arches. If they don't, please report them as "No feet". Shoes and socks aren't really what wikiFeet is about."
What he said ^ ^ ^
davetrimble (user)2015-06-29 00:00:46
Interesting, isn't the heel part of the sole?
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-06-29 00:07:42
These guys wanna see whole, bare soles in the camera lens.
Some also think if there are no toes showing it's NFS. Not true!
Some users here believe and insist that this is "a BAREFOOT board!"
Another poll we ran showed that almost *nobody* but Grik and a few others even *want* that (and I'd be gone 'in a New York minute' if it were nothing but bare feet), but most users also don't want it to be a 'shoe site' like so many others are.
@Dave- Interesting point, but no one has interpreted it that way. So is the arch, and they report those 'NFS' constantly, even though they are allowed. Also toe cleavage doesn't count and according to a poll we ran, most don't *want* it to count.
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2015-06-29 00:18:18
Please re-report this set as nfs as some nitwit has gone ahead and unreported them.
davetrimble (user)2015-06-29 00:18:29
Just felt these pics would provide an interesting debate whether or not they belong here , I really don't care either way but I was curious , for my 2 cents I love this girl but I would never bother to look at those pics
Scarlet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-06-29 14:54:01
When I read the damn guidelines it said heels count and there are hundreds of pics on site of just heels!