(Starting over) This is the sexiest pic shot on Seersha! Nudity shots are to be expected very soon. I don't know if I get an extra supply of "Jack Daniels" or of "Prozac" or of both. I will see to it..
Indeed. I didn't know this one until all the recent publicity about her, or didn't think I did until I saw a story on her on CBS Sunday Morning recently. Turns out I'd seen her in "Hanna" a few years ago (2011). If there are any fans of hers who are interested, it can be found on CBS.com or on YouTube here:
I don't actively *look* for feet in everything like you pervs, but in reviewing this vid to see if I could post it on the wall, there really is only one brief glimpse (maybe) at 1:16 and shoes/legs at 5:17. This one's just for if you're a fanboy of *her.*
Fun Fact: She says her name ("Sear´-shuh") is Irish for 'Freedom' or 'Liberty' but we'd have to have Pinchy or Pixxxie back that one up.
Former discussion was focused on pic size and risizing. Your viewpoint is focused on what? Prevs? Aren't we all (on the planet), in a manner of speaking? I am a "fandamnold" of her. Allow me! Irish Gaelic for freedom: saoirse Scottish Gaelic for freedom: saorsainn I don't Google. Instead, I yandex.ru.
@Szel>"Pervs? Aren't we all (on the planet), in a manner of speaking?" Oh, ABSOLUTELY! I was saying it in a affectionate manner for my fellow foot admirers. But I have to admit that like many girls, I get some amusement and/or little revulsion at the idea of guys who are *actually* on this site to wank to feet! But 'wanking' in general is a funny thing, yes?
"I'm an aesthete, not a one-track fetishist." ~@Restraints (on Diana Krall wall)
Funny... removed as duplicate. But the original pics were just the same, a bit enlarged. Is it the prime purpose of the site? Size?
Visualizer (user)2016-03-02 18:18:51
They were slightly larger then the ones i uploaded, i think her feet look a bit more visible on the upgraded ones, so i reported the lower res ones. I don't think they were manually enhanced, might have to double check that
Good input, VIS. I may be mistaken but I recall the former pics were around yyy x 750 pxels. Therefore, any enlargement to 1000 pexels will not be noticeable to the eye ( I think). I don't mean or suggest the new pics were subjected to such procedure but... does it add anything to quality? Anyway... no big deal!