Just curious; does anyone - admin, GK, etc. go through and clean out the comment threads from the wall with removed pictures? When they pop up in my pending, I'm tempted to reject them because they leave this trash in their wake.
@SlimJim- That would be the admin. responsibility. However, some smart, savvy people on the site (Mr Hate) tend to comment on the higher quality photo instead of the lower quality in the case of duplicates. It's nearly unavoidable when it comes to PQ pics. Someone always has to comment on the shitty quality, leaving us all with that unattractive red "Removed" sign.
@Elway- yep, and that's a pithy comment. I wish I could take credit for it, but it was from @Restraints, on the Diana Krall wall, apropos a discussion of why people come here other than to wank, which some insist *everyone* here does-- some serious projection on their parts, as I never have yet since I've been c̶o̶m̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ visiting this site. It's an interesting read.
@bigpapi... this is the best definition I can think of. Kudos. I hope you will make yourself ALIVE more often on these walls. BTW, and I am not daring to compare, but Olivia's feet (your Olivia) have a couple of these characteristics as welll. Again, I am not comparing.
2015-04-27 15:28:43Toetapper (user)
It has been a long time since I have seen a woman who could so elegantly and classically pose her legs and feet. This is especially noticeable as she exposes her inner arch and a fabulous shape of her feet - particularly while in high-heels.
That said, I wish she would take better care of her nails. Hard to tell about the shapeliness or evenness/graduated length of her toes.
Just the opinion of one who would like to 5/5 but will settle for 4/5.