Welcome to wikiFeet.

Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
ToothpickTorture - 5230
(0.46% reported)
celebs - 2305
(0.56% reported)
Kawen Mr Jeyt - 2283
(0.18% reported)
sterne - 2241
(2.81% reported)
Shanghai Red - 1998
(0.10% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Raquel Welch

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 9.5 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (739 total votes)
538
beautiful
124
nice
54
ok
16
bad
7
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info64 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Raquel Welch's feet, also liked:
Salma Hayek
Jessica Alba (I)
Eva Longoria
Emma Watson (II)
Danica Patrick
Got anymore Raquel Welch Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2015-07-13 18:42:33  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@feets- Gotta love the euphemisms used in the 50s & 60s...
e.g. "Camera Clubs" (Bettie Page) and "Art Theaters" (porno flicks)
and this... "Figure Studies."



Uh-huh. And they read Playboy for the articles.
Just like my dad always did at the barbershop when I was a tike in the mid-sixties! But when *I* tried once when just dropped off there alone, the barber wouldn't let me read that one! ;) Guess he figured the reading level of a six-year-old wasn't up to reading Playboy articles.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-14 04:04:16
@BiB60 Yeah I remember me and my best friend raiding my Dad's Playboy collection in the 70's and no we didn't spend time reading the articles. It's a shame though in they contained some of the greatest fiction of the 20th Century. John Updike, Joseph Heller, Ray Bradbury, Michael Crichton, Norman Mailer and Kurt Vonnegut among others were all regularly published there. Hell I remember when Gallery, High Society, and Oui all had cutting edge journalism to fill pages and to be utterly ignored buy their "readers"
Blacklist user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-14 04:13:50
@BiB60 I like the "Figure Studies" euphemism, in it focuses on the unsung heroes of the site, the glamour and fashion photographers, an enormous proportion of my uploads are of the work of 2 men Harry Langdon Jr., and Angelo Frontoni (Raquel was a regular subject of both)
It is surprising in that we are here on these walls at Eli's request to discuss "aesthetics", that the subject of the photographers never comes up. A less enlightened person might guess that these walls have nothing to do with "an intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics"
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-14 05:48:14
My uncle had some Playboy calendars upstairs in his 'man cave' that I found. But when I was about 11, I had a neighbor who was babysitting for another neighbor swipe one for me. Her dad was a cop, found out, and we both got in trouble! I could even tell you which issue it was if I saw the covers (I wanna say about June '71...). Later in life, I had the entire set in near-mint condition, all but about the first six (really rare & expensive) issues. They were sadly all "lost" at some point in my mid-twenties (don't ask!) Wish I had them *now* although most bring almost nothing on eBay. I have since reacquired the '77(?) Farrah Fawcett one (first/best of several she did).
Blacklist user
Reply
2014-10-08 12:17:29miki  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
The camel toe is distracting.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 19:53:57
11-toed women are my faves
Blacklist user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 19:58:04
they have more than the average woman
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 19:59:46
Posted below with this photo callout also, but it got buried. You know I gotta (it's a law!):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpP7dtRBPp4
Blacklist user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 20:01:16
its in the rules @BiB... always great for a laugh !
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 20:03:21
It *is* a catchy tune. I can almost sing along now! ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 20:09:14
yeah, now its gonna be stuck in my head all day
Blacklist user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 20:26:58
@BiB60 YOUR killing me today just watched that video and am still laughing as I'm writing this :)
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-13 21:44:38
Camel toe?!?! More like a moose-knuckle!!!!
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-07-13 18:46:47Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Angus, this looks like a standoff. You are in prime position. But, are you primed?!?
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-13 19:37:43
See 2014-10-08 13:54:58 by @BackInBlack60
Blacklist user
Reply
2014-10-08 13:54:58  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@ILF- Is that you there on the chain? Whatcha lookin' at?

Yep, that settles it. I'm absolutely, positively coming back next time as a hot celeb girl's dog. Woof!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  Iluvfeet  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 00:55:34
Yup - that would be me, but I'm definitely changing the cat vs. dog image.
Blacklist user
Reply
  Iluvfeet  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 00:57:02
She's thinking, "calm down boy, you'll get your treat ".
Blacklist user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 01:41:46
I'll come back as a kitty they "cuddle" more :)
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 19:33:06
@ILF- I'm thiking @tweety ^^^ didn't get your joke. But I did! ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
  Iluvfeet  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 19:44:07
@BiB - I believe you and I are on the same wavelength on many things.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 19:50:29
@ILF- *thinking (I can spell, sometimes)
Yes, "Great minds run together."
Apparently, so do *ours!*
(:^p)
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-13 19:36:56
@Grik- Been there, done that already, dude.
I know it's hard for you when you're only here like 22 hours a day, but *try* to keep up, 'k?
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-07-01 06:26:58Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
She will soon be between a rock and a hard place called Grik
 
Reply
Blacklist user
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-13 18:56:13
Grik- Sorry to disappoint, but she was out on my property when this photo was taken. That was back in the smokin' sixties when I still had all of my teeth. Shoulda never smoked that god damn corn pipe.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-07-13 18:44:51Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
That's a hot one-piece. Beautiful, smooth legs.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-07-05 14:23:41Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
A monumental discovery Feets, of a monumental babe. Geez her feet look sexy here
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-07-01 16:06:19  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I'll put on that SCUBA gear, dive deep, and stay down as long as it takes!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-07-01 16:21:50
@Angus- Just make sure that you don't fall asleep.That could be fatal aka Snore Killing ; )
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-01 18:27:21
Yeah, speaking of snorkeling, as I told @Kranz elsewhere, yours truly actually used to own and operate this device:

http://bit.ly/1GNAdNv

(:^ppppppppp)
Blacklist user
Reply
HiddenNinjaOfTheFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-01 18:32:09
You'll need someone to assist with this diving expedition, I'll be your right hand man. *thumbs up*
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-01 19:32:13
No dive buddies on this one! They told me in dive school that "thumbs up" means to surface, which you should do, because *I got this!*

You're supposed to use the 'OK' symbol (which in some countries means 'a$$hole')
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-21 17:17:11toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
#tippytoes
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-01 05:47:37
Yeah, I love when that happens!
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-07-01 05:41:41footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
In the 60s and 70s she was the queen of sexy and for ever will be.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-02-01 22:55:21Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Adult Content
JESUS CHRIST she's hot. ;)
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:34:37
That picture was here before and reported/removed. It's highly offensive to many people.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:39:09
Not me, I'm an atheist! :D
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:41:30
So is Grik. But not everyone here is.


And neither of you always will be.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:57:53
What is that supposed to mean?
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:05:49
It means when you're 'panim el panim' with your Creator (not Eli, the other one, יהוה) someday, it'll be tough to deny. Just hide 'n' watch. Someone is wrong. I'd rather it be me who was was wrong than an atheist who was wrong.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:07:28
@L2- "I'm an aesthete, not a one-track fetishist."
I'm also not a cannibal.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:10:02
If I'm wrong, then god will forgive me. Isn't that what christians believe?
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:14:31
@SG- No, not universally, and not 'usually.' Depends on who you talk to and what the circumstances are. That's not the point, and this really isn't the place for a debate... the point is it's offensive to enough users and guests here that it was removed once before. Maybe it will be again. I remember now it was actually removed as "Adult Content- BDSM"
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 00:14:31
I'm not Christian, but I can see how it would offend them. As far as religion is concerned, I've always been confused. Like @BIB said, I'd rather be the right wrong.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:23:45
I know this isn't the place for a debate, but here's what I understand about the concept of God: If he created us, then he knows us better than we know ourselves. He knows our minds, our hearts, and he knows exactly why we believe what we believe. If someone doesn't believe in him, god will understand exactly why. He knows that the person felt they had good reason not to believe in him. What, you think a perfect god would be so ignorant that he would think atheists just hate him? How can you hate something that you don't even believe exists? God isn't stupid, if he exists. He knows all and understands all. If you think anything other than that, then you're wrong. Seems I understand the concept of your god better than you do, and I don't even believe in him.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:26:17
There is no hell, Lawrence. Only the one you create in your own mind.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:34:53
That I agree with.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:36:59
@Shoegazer- The only problem with your concept of God is that it disagrees with the 'handbook' for that particular faith, and most others.

But, if we're going with other theories, here are a couple that seem to half-way make sense based on empirical evidence:

"Hell is empty; all the devils are here."
~William Shakespeare

“We are each our own devil, and we make this world our hell.”
~Oscar Wilde
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 00:48:42
@Shoe- Perhaps Buddhism is more your cup of tea.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:55:38
Kranz, it's funny, my therapist suggested Buddhism to me as well.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:56:21
@SG- Yeah, I definitely would stay away from Hinduism.

Sure, like I've never heard all those before. How about extrabiblical historical references which mention Jesus as a real and living person and verify that he was in fact crucified by Pontius Pilate? There are several of those not 'written by Jesus' buddies' (and BTW, only a few books of the New Testament were written by people Jesus knew personally).
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:57:03
But as Ferris Bueller said, a person shouldn't believe in an "ism", they should believe in themself.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:57:16
@Kranz- Ever read "Be Here Now?" It was mentioned in that video I posted @you in GC.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:58:17
BIB, I'm not saying that Jesus didn't exist. I absolutely believe that he was a real person. But as for being the son of god? Hogwash. More likely his mom was a wh*re who got knocked up when she shouldn't have, claimed that "god did it", and accidentally started a religion.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 01:02:12
@SG- Have heard the 'Roman Centurion' theory before too. Again, if you wanna spend a few hours in Guild Chat sometime, I'd be 'happy' to debate it all (even though I swore I was done with all that), but we need to shut it down on this wall. Sorry I started it. Really just wanted to let people know that pic was reported & removed before... and nothing more.
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 01:17:26
@BIB- I've nit read it, but bet your buns I'm gonna! (:^D)
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 01:23:24
@Kranz- I had a High School teacher who was big-time into all that Baba Ram Dass (aka Dr. Richard Alpert) "Be Here Now" and Maharishi Mahesh Yogi/TM stuff. He got me hooked into some of that, mainly Richard Bach's trilogy - "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" (life-changing), "Bridge Across Forever" and "One." Good reading.
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 01:41:31
@BIB- Funny story; I was at a party with my (then) girlfriend and the assbag hosting was flirting with her by trying to shove his collection of Ram Dass down her throat. More than likely an attempt to shove something else down it. This was in like 98, I was *still in my 20s, so I had to give him the old gangster slap. (:^p). So that's why I've been reluctant to read any of his work. See how the mind works?
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 01:51:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPOfurmrjxo
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 02:43:22
I'm sorry too. But just know that you're not going to change my opinion, just like I'm not going to change yours.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:01:30
@Shoegazer- You'd be *amazed* how many times in my life that my opinion *has* changed and how many religions I've followed at various points, and how much studying I've done of them all (and the funny thing is, eventually I sorta came full circle). It's always healthy to continuously re-examine one's belief system, especially anytime 'new information' is presented.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:04:57
Jayzuz I love threads! My take is this - you go to Heaven for the climate; you go to Hell for the company! As for god (the imaginary one upstairs, not Creator), there is absolutely no proof He exists (even the rabid feminists had him as a she..........................wait a moment..............God is Here...............in the form of Bailey Jay!!!!!!!) Yay!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:10:58
God is inside all of us. So is the devil. We are all capable of good or evil. The choice is up to humans. There is no invisible hand guiding us to either one. Too many people need a crutch in the form of god or satan. I, however, do not. And neither do millions of others.
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 03:19:31
@BIB- You've done some serious soul searching. I love that, man. I seem to be getting around to that myself. Your religious background and mine aren't so different. At the end of the day, I only want to do what's right.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:25:20
I grew up with very religious surroundings, reading the bible all the time, so I have some knowledge of it. My opinion is that if the whole world were atheist, there would be a lot less war. Most of that is based on religious beliefs.
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:26:09
I believe that God/god, regardless of what form we might assign to him, is not limited to the personal views or whims of greedy "clergymen" or Popes. God merely is. He does not hate. He does not love. He just exists. I believe that we are here to enjoy the privilege of life, love, misery, confusion, death, hatred, hope, and the ability to dream. God has never had these; therefore he created us so that we might experience what he never could. I don't *know* any of this, but I do believe it. So, that is my #2cents. :)
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:30:56
That's not bad, Templar. That's a theory I could get behind.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:33:32
I'm so *very* sorry I started this. My policy (now, after a couple of 'painful' decades of head-banging on walls) is generally not to engage anyone for any reason about politics, religion, and a few other topics. This is why. I don't generally do it unless someone slaps me square in the face about *mine* first, then I almost can't stop myself. I'm sorry (for being a man of conviction and passion? If that requires an apology?) Please just report/justify the damn picture on the *proper* grounds and forget I said anything at all.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:35:43
It's mostly my fault, BIB, and for that I apologize. Anyway, I justify the pic because Raquel is damn hot!
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:44:32
No one has anything to be sorry about! This is debate and exchanging of views. Although none of it has anything to do with feet we are exchanging views and getting to know each other better. It's a by-product of WikiFeet. And it's refreshing to not have a Deputy Principal shoving her views down our throats in a "you-know-nothing" manner.
Blacklist user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:49:25
@Grik I agree and it was a civilized discussion and none of that "your an a**hole" or any other cut downs or shows of dis-respect:)
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:52:11
I have to agree too, Grik. The way I look at it, we can disagree on anything, because what brings us all together is FEET! We all love feet, and we'll always have that. I think that's a pretty damn cool connection we all have here.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:54:05
[Member since: Sep 2010]
Nah, the sad thing is we're *not* exchanging views. If you only knew... I have cogent and well-researched answers for *every* question that has been raised here, and I can go for *hours* from only what is in my head... no reference, no notes, no Google. It's just the wrong time & place to do that & we should never have even gotten started down that road. I merely wanted to let people know that picture *will* offend many people for several reasons, *one* of which is 'religious sensibilities.' At least (most) Christians won't put out a fatwa about you and then sentence you to death, like one major religion seems to do if you make fun of their prophet. But 'poor taste' isn't a reason to report a picture. "Adult Content for BDSM" *is* a valid reason.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:58:13
It's not BDSM though. You're telling me that any picture of anyone tied to anything can be considered adult content? That's BS.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:01:28
It's not as if anyone here would say" "Mohammad she's hot!!!'
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:02:14
Or "She gives me a fatwa!!!"
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:02:57
She's causing a Jihad in my pants!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:03:22
This is off-topic, but just wondering...why does literally everyone but me have beer as their profile pic?
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:08:17
@Shoegazer- Go read the LONG thread on Megan Fox's wall. Your question will be answered.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:10:29
Okay, lol.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:11:14
@Shoegazer- Yes, any woman tied up in any way is by definition bondage and any bondage is *here* considered "Adult Content." Even screencaps from mainstream TV/film. You obviously belong to the Guild, since you are answering unapproved comments. Do you ever go to the Guild page and read Chat or the Announcements? The 'official' avatar theme for this two weeks, chosen by @Smoothsole, was to use @Admirer1's last avatar (the beer mugs one) as a tribute to him. Or see the long thread about him and the avatar tribute on Megan Fox' wall.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:14:43
Yeah, I just read it. I technically have a drink in my avatar, in the bottom right corner it's a bottle and glass of Campari. Does that count? Or should I do the beer thing too?
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:15:24
Also, is Smoothsole a girl?
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 04:22:19
I didn't notice that at first. I used to
LOVE Campari and soda years ago!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:27:25
Sweet! That pic is from the Campari calendar from last year!
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:28:50
@Shoegazer- Up to you, depending on how well you knew @A1. Re @Smoothsole- just like a religion, it kinda depends on what you believe based on what there is some pretty good evidence of, yet there is no visible proof available right now! :) Yes, I'm sure she is what she claims she is. Several others here are *not* so sure, and one theory is that 'she' is really @Grik. Both she and Grik get a kick out of that theory.
Blacklist user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:29:23
Sad, but I've grown so used to checking if there is nudity, feet showing (by the definition of the site) that I was oblivious to the content here, which I myself consider offensive and inflamatory. I was also unaware it was removed previously. So, despite uploading the shot. I am reporting it as adult content for bondage ( join me if you wish) (grab the shot if you wish) the choice is yours.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:33:07
I don't think I really knew @A1 at all, so I'll stick with Uma, but I'll pour out some Campari in memory of him.

That's hilarious about Smoothsole possibly being Grikess!
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:33:19
It won't bother me if you take the picture down. I'm storing it in my 'archive'.
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:38:27
If @Smoothie = @Grik, that means that I have flirted with him. Ugh!!! I doubt that this is true. Only Mr. Eli Ozer (or Gil) knows the truth about that.
Blacklist user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-02-02 04:44:26
Wink, wink.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:47:38
@T97- TWO of the Orange Guilders are *firmly* convinced it's a 'known fact' and both of those even *claim* to have some form of proof that they cannot disclose. One of 'em just winked. The other says #timewilltell
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 05:45:18
I have a *new* theory- perhaps... @Mr Hate is really @Smoothie!
Yeah... that's *got* to be it, and explains a lot! ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 05:49:58
That would make more sense considering
how well thought out all those puns were!!!
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 11:09:20
HATENESS is ADAMANT Smoothness and Grikness are 1 and the same ( hence the nudge, nudge, wink, wink above). Stuffed if I know how he comes to this conclusion. I've forgotten. It's funny to me.. I still love Hateness. It's Black or White in his world. No grey matter. Maybe if Smoothness accidentally used GAMOTO one day then it's a fait accompli
Blacklist user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-02-02 14:19:09
Your so paranoid @Grikness. I was just having some fun. Wink, wink. LOL!!!
Blacklist user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-02-02 21:01:42
Am I the only one who thinks this sort of "it offends me personally, so I'd like it removed despite it not actually breaking any established rules" thing is kind of awful? How is it not a misuse of the reporting system? There's no "this offends me personally" option when you report. You can't rightly just flag it as adult content for no reason. Under that logic we should be able to flag anyone wearing fur as "adult content". Or what if someone is wearing a band t-shirt from a band that uses dirty words, should we flag that? Inverted crosses are all the rage on t-shirts today, should we flag any pictures where a girl is sporting that sort of thing? I just think that we shouldn't support this kind of misuse of the system. We already have established rules as to what's report worthy. I think it's gonna hurt the community if we just allow people to essentially make stuff up and bend those rules to mean whatever they want. I still can't believe the majority of the community supported the removal of that picture.
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 21:17:04
@777 I know. That energy should have been directed towards thanking the person who rid (albeit temporarily) wikiFeet of the Bailey Jay pictures most recent and being vigilant in keeping them off. See, if 100% of people could agree on something, Eli would have no reason to keep that gallery and others like it. Saving that gallery isn't about "if a gallery can be deleted, others aren't safe." No, if a gallery that truly BELONGS here was to be removed overnight, THEN Eli would suspend that person and bring back pictures.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:18:52
@Mishu777- It was *not* deleted because it 'offends [anyone] personally' but rather because of AC/Bondage. Had nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with being tied up. The 'majority of the community supported the removal of that picture' not once, but TWICE.

@54- Funny, I thought I saw you in Fireside Chat yesterday when Eli explained *why* he hasn't restored the pictures... the system is now split between two server types (to speed it up) and he said it's not as easy as one 'push of a button' now as it was a month or two ago. The person(s) who did it *was/were* suspended the very next day... several accounts. Get your facts straight. Here's another one... @Mishu777 isn't on-board with your agenda, having been one of the *few* true 'voices of reason' on Bailey Jay's comment wall.

I don't understand why you bigots and haters of other humans keep trying to push your failed agenda upon an unwilling site owner. And everyone else.

So you are saying that promoting violence against women is GOOD, but guys who want to be women are BAD, is that right? It's fine for a guy to want to *beat* a woman but not *be* one?
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:30:09
Angus....................are you Bruce Jennering?!?!?!?
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:31:49
Mishu777 is absolutely correct in my view. The picture did not transgress the 'rules' here. Funny that a pic that offends religious beliefs gets kebabed but pics that offend Christian beliefs do not.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:44:21
@Grik- Nope, not gonna fly. It had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with a prohibition of bondage as AC.
I can think of *dozens* if not *hundreds* of similar pictures that have been removed for that same reason. None of them involved a cross or any other religious imagery, but all involved women being bound by chains, ropes, shackles, straps, manacles, stocks, etc.

What do you mean am I Jennering? No way I'd do all that, but I *will* defend to the death his right to pursue that course. Hell, I'll even set up a gallery when the work's done. And I won't rest until Bailey Jay is restored, if I have to go find and upload new pictures myself from scratch or from Reesie's archive.
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 22:45:22
@BackInBlack60 I don't see what my reply to 777's reply has to do with "*why*" Eli hasn't restored those pictures.

Dictionary definition of bigot: "A person who is obstinately devoted to his or her opinions." Sounds like whoever worded that definition had an agenda of their own. In cases like this "opinion" is fact. That gallery you like and other galleries like it have no place here. I have no problem with those types being what they are, but wanting to push that on normal people is ok how? There was once a discussion about fat and obese ladies running around in bikinis and other revealing clothing and how they were slammed for doing that. It was agreed that if they DRAW ATTENTION TO THEMSELVES (Examples: Ajay Rochester, June Shannon, Kardashian and many others) they're fair game. While Gabourey Sidibe and certain others should be left alone because they're not out there being fools with neon signs over their heads. Same exact thing goes for the men in those galleries you're fighting for. It would be one thing if Bailey Jay was out in public fully dressed and a picture was taken and that's it. It's a whole other for him to spread his legs more than once and have those pictures posted where they don't belong. Make sense?

You wanted the Raquel Welch picture removed on a STRETCH of a technicality! Raquel wasn't being bound, her mouth wasn't taped, and most of all was never a nude "model." Could it have been deemed offensive? Sure. I'm catholic and at first said, Wow! But I didn't go running for a "Report as ____ ____" button because there isn't one for that picture. I think what was going on with priests in the era that picture was taken trumps a HARMLESS picture. If we're going to have pictures removed on now a stretch of a technicality, how about getting pictures removed that don't jive with the rules Eli has posted currently? I found 3 rules that could get a few sick galleries removed.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 23:05:26
@54>"That gallery you like and other galleries like it have no place here." I do *not* like that gallery *at all* but you are patently wrong when you say it and the others 'have no place here.' YES, they DO, because again, they guy who owns the domain name, runs the computer and pays for the bandwidth *says* they do. My *personal* preference is that they not be here, and that I *never* have to look at them, and failing this, that they should be clearly flagged so that everyone knows what they're looking at (them that like it and them that don't). *My* agenda is defending the rules and the site. I personally don't care what they are or what's here. Unlike others, I just skip what I don't like and move on. I realize that the cross was a Roman torture and execution device *way* before it was ever adopted as a religious symbol.

YOU are the one who was banging this drum loudly and several tiems in Fireside Chat yesterday:

"Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy"

So how about walking the talk, turning off the 'hateful' and turning on the 'classy' rather than taking the moral high ground only when it's convenient to your agenda?

Again, FYI... you might be interested to know that I neither reported nor justified that picture (this time around - I did justify the first one that was pulled a while back).

What *was* going on then? John XXIII & Vatican II?
Blacklist user
Reply
keeperoflostsoles  (user)2015-02-02 23:36:04
im not even gonna read this. Too long. You guys are passionate about something though.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 00:27:13
@Keeper - Yep! TL;DR works. I've done it myself on this site! Not to mention being responsible for a lot of 'em!
Blacklist user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-02-03 03:12:50
Fair enough on the "bondage" thing as opposed to it being removed for religious reasons. But I still can't help but think that we're stretching the definition of bondage, if not just a little bit. The intent of the shot clearly wasn't to imply some sort of sexual nature to bondage or torture. It's a promo shoot from some movie she's in about cavemen and dinosaurs and the like. A PG movie mind you. I could understand if she had a ballgag in her mouth and a look of terror on her face, but she doesn't. I can totally respect that the owner doesn't want this to be an "adult site" and doesn't want any actual nudity or otherwise clearly pornographic material. But let's be honest with ourselves here, this isn't a children's site either and there's likely one main reason people come here and look at these pics. The very nature of this site is fetishistic in it's core. I don't see why we should be overly cautious or conservative in our definition of "sexual content". I don't think it's too hard to draw a definitive line between obvious pornography and "what this site is" with just a bit of common sense.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 03:30:09
I'm totally with Mishu777 on this - PC has reared its ugly head here. The Pic was not all about bondage as its premise - but the puritans 'saw' bondage and that was enough. That is total BS
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 04:01:14
@Mishu- Yeah, you're probably partly or largely correct on most of what you just said, and/or I'm sick of arguing about it. The only point I really take exception with is the same one I hear so often, "We're all here for one and the same reason." Oh, hell no, we are *not* but that ground has all been covered on several walls before. Check here:
http://www.wikifeet.com/Diana_Krall#thewall
http://www.wikifeet.com/Letitia_Dean#thewall

It's never a good idea to try to pigeon-hole people and make the assumption they were all cut from the same cloth or fell out of the same mold... it just doesn't work that way.

The movie you speak of is "One Million Years B.C." from 1966.
The picture in question here (#1493147 B&W or #1588491 color) had nothing to do with that or any other movie. It is merely a portrait of her by famous portrait photographer Terry O'Neill, and was taken in 1968, two years after the movie release. However, the outfit may have been inspired by her 1MM Years BC costume.

One more quick point: The definition of 'Adult Content' on *this* site bears absolutely no resemblance to that definition anywhere else in the civilized world. (For that, take a look at discussions on Riley Reid's and Franciely Freduzeski's walls about stuff the Owner *himself* removed that was in *no* way remotely close to 'AC')
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 04:10:46
@Grik- I guess you missed the part way up there in the thread (feets of strength 2015-02-02 04:29:23) that the uploader *himself* reported the picture and requested that we justify his report if we agreed. I didn't 'vote,' but others did and it's gone now. AND I just posted the 'ghost image' numbers for both versions, so don't blame me.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 04:15:44
Not blaming you at all Angus - actually, the uploader should have had the courage of his convictions and stuck to the pic. I would have defended it to the death! It was a magnificent pic!
Blacklist user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-02-03 05:19:58
In all fairness I did say "there's likely one main reason people come here and look at these pics". I fully understand not literally EVERYONE comes here for the same reason. But I feel pretty safe in saying that like 95+% do. As for the definition of AC on this site, I guess the owner himself is a bit confused if he's going so far to imply that any thumbnail that could possibly even be mistaken as AC despite it most definitely not being AC should be flagged and removed anyway. But what do we do with that definition? Should we follow up on it and report pictures randomly because "If you stand back really far and blur your eyes it kiiiinda looks like her knees could be boobs"? Or should we all try to come together to find a more solid definition? Or is it just the sort of thing where it's up to the owner and it's random and there's nothing you can really do about it?
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:02:48
Y'all can dispute and argue about prescise definitions, context, and politically correct site management all day (wait... you did!), but I would like to add that I thought the photo was sexy. Eli, because of the constraints/conditions of his sponsors, would not want this kind of content in his galleries. I totally understand and comprehend this, which is why I saved the photograph in my "naughty archive". If you see a suggestive picture that you like but that you *know* will inevitably be removed, just save the picture for your own personal enjoyment. That would cut down on much of this repeated, futile discussion. The site is what it is what is is, and I'm pleased to have the ability to visit this enormous archive at no cost, anytime I want to view my favorite celeb's feet. What a privilege!!
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:51:39
@Mishu>"Or is it just the sort of thing where it's up to the owner and it's random and there's nothing you can really do about it?"

I think you have an accurate assessment of the sitch there, sir.
You have grasped the concept now.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:56:03
What @T97 said - If you like something, download it and save it, because it may be gone tomorrow (and I'll expand that to *even* if you think it's perfectly safe and won't be deleted). That definitely applies to YouTube also, and many other pages and sites on the web. It's truly like 'the Memory Hole' in 1984 where anything can be and is altered or vanished at any time, 'as if it never was.' Unless you're an archivist with a lotta storage space! ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-02-04 03:56:50
So in retrospect what is the sacred meaning of life & what is the role of the messiah as well?

And was http://bit.ly/1zzC1Jw truly AC? ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
Its Still Real 2 Me  (user)2015-03-20 20:03:42
I can't believe I read this entire thread. Really hammers home the ol' saying "Never talk politics or religion with strangers". It's rarely ever a conversation...I mean, a TRUE conversation...it's just two people (in this case, more than two) squawking at each other about their inflexible beliefs. boring and tedious. Espc. on a foot forum.

Anyway...carry on...
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 20:17:05
@Real- Agree on politics or religion, but...
what do you want to talk about... FEET?
Nothing more boring than *talking* about feet!
Blacklist user
Reply
celebs  (user)2015-03-20 20:21:05
Thanks BiB for waking me up, so far i thought this site is all about *TALKING* feet!
Blacklist user
Reply
Its Still Real 2 Me  (user)2015-03-20 21:18:13
@BIB60: haha I guess I'm getting Vietnam flashbacks from all the religion discussions I've observed and taken part in on the interwebs. Especially on Youtube. Those days are behind me, I'm proud to say...
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:36:29
@Se7en- Yep, been thee, done that & got the T-shirt also and glad I'm done!
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-01 05:15:59
Why was this pic kebabed again? Who did it offend? Who gives a shit?
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-07-01 04:11:05GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
WHATCHA GOT THERE LIL GIRL
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-07-01 04:50:14
"But... Why is the RUM gone?!?!?"
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-21 17:03:40  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@GS74 landed another great gig--->




#horse
 
Reply
Blacklist user
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-06-21 17:15:21
THOSE WERE THE DAYS: SPOILER ALERT SHE SMELLS NICE. LIKE APPLES
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-20 23:32:42stealthman  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
One word...........................FINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-15 01:40:04GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
THERE'S A 12 STEP PROGRAM I CAN GET BEHIND
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-08 01:40:56feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
#wetfeet
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-06-14 16:33:17
Vintage #wetfeet indeed
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-08 03:11:11hifi  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
A rare beauty that grows more beautiful with age.Raquel has a sexy body and lovely feet.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-06-08 04:25:24
Yes sir.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-08 02:18:52showthosefeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
this is when I was into her as a kid.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-28 17:58:32  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Oh, my, @feets of strength!

I think I actually recall this one somewhere in the depths of my pornographic memory.



And in her case, it ain't 'False Mammary Syndrome!'
 
Reply
Blacklist user
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-29 02:35:01
@BiB60 I like "False Mammary Syndrome"
I was blown away with the pic but disappointed I couldn't find it in higher quality. Maybe someone else will have better luck. It seems like every other day a new Raquel pic will sneak into the interwebs but she's particularly majestic in this one.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-30 02:37:52
@Feets- Nothing like a little psych humour, eh?
My favourite:
Two psychiatrists were walking down a hall.
One turned to the other and said, “Hello.”
The other one thought, “I wonder what he meant by that?”
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-04-28 18:06:53footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
A stunning beauty and talent that will stand the test of time.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
55 wall posts left