Welcome to wikiFeet.

Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
ToothpickTorture - 3382
(0.89% reported)
celebs - 2771
(0.43% reported)
toelover143 - 1507
(0.13% reported)
Grik - 1211
(8.75% reported)
Shanghai Red - 1207
(0.17% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Raquel Welch

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 9.5 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (733 total votes)
532
beautiful
123
nice
55
ok
16
bad
7
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info63 pictures were removed from this gallery.

Got anymore Raquel Welch Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2015-06-21 17:17:11toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
#tippytoes
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-21 17:03:40  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@GS74 landed another great gig--->




#horse
 
Reply
Blacklist user
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-06-21 17:15:21
THOSE WERE THE DAYS: SPOILER ALERT SHE SMELLS NICE. LIKE APPLES
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-20 23:32:42stealthman  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
One word...........................FINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-15 01:40:04GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
THERE'S A 12 STEP PROGRAM I CAN GET BEHIND
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-06-08 01:40:56feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
#wetfeet
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-06-14 16:33:17
Vintage #wetfeet indeed
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-08 03:11:11hifi  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
A rare beauty that grows more beautiful with age.Raquel has a sexy body and lovely feet.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-06-08 04:25:24
Yes sir.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-06-08 02:18:52showthosefeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
this is when I was into her as a kid.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-28 17:58:32  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Oh, my, @feets of strength!

I think I actually recall this one somewhere in the depths of my pornographic memory.



And in her case, it ain't 'False Mammary Syndrome!'
 
Reply
Blacklist user
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-29 02:35:01
@BiB60 I like "False Mammary Syndrome"
I was blown away with the pic but disappointed I couldn't find it in higher quality. Maybe someone else will have better luck. It seems like every other day a new Raquel pic will sneak into the interwebs but she's particularly majestic in this one.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-30 02:37:52
@Feets- Nothing like a little psych humour, eh?
My favourite:
Two psychiatrists were walking down a hall.
One turned to the other and said, “Hello.”
The other one thought, “I wonder what he meant by that?”
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-04-28 18:06:53footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
A stunning beauty and talent that will stand the test of time.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-10 06:37:37footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
New pics great but the old ones are still good to like this one. A classic beauty.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-10 07:16:28
Oh, yeah! I forgot about *that* one!
Lotta great ones here.
SHE is one of the great ones of all time!
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-04-10 06:30:12  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
That may have just become my fave pic in this gallery!-->


Not sure... it's SO HARD...


to choose.
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-07 02:32:32tbager  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
So sexy..... never better than this...
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-04-07 02:21:24footsiefoot reborn  (user)
I don't know if she is the last of a generation or the start of another. But she will always be a Hollywood beauty, she has beauty,talent,and beautiful feet. She will always be a true move star.in the best.sence of the word
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-03-26 22:20:32ali baba  (user)
Her toes are like fine wine better with age!!!!!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
2015-02-01 22:55:21Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Adult Content
JESUS CHRIST she's hot. ;)
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:34:37
That picture was here before and reported/removed. It's highly offensive to many people.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:39:09
Not me, I'm an atheist! :D
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:41:30
So is Grik. But not everyone here is.


And neither of you always will be.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-01 23:57:53
What is that supposed to mean?
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:05:49
It means when you're 'panim el panim' with your Creator (not Eli, the other one, יהוה) someday, it'll be tough to deny. Just hide 'n' watch. Someone is wrong. I'd rather it be me who was was wrong than an atheist who was wrong.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:07:28
@L2- "I'm an aesthete, not a one-track fetishist."
I'm also not a cannibal.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:10:02
If I'm wrong, then god will forgive me. Isn't that what christians believe?
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:14:31
@SG- No, not universally, and not 'usually.' Depends on who you talk to and what the circumstances are. That's not the point, and this really isn't the place for a debate... the point is it's offensive to enough users and guests here that it was removed once before. Maybe it will be again. I remember now it was actually removed as "Adult Content- BDSM"
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 00:14:31
I'm not Christian, but I can see how it would offend them. As far as religion is concerned, I've always been confused. Like @BIB said, I'd rather be the right wrong.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:23:45
I know this isn't the place for a debate, but here's what I understand about the concept of God: If he created us, then he knows us better than we know ourselves. He knows our minds, our hearts, and he knows exactly why we believe what we believe. If someone doesn't believe in him, god will understand exactly why. He knows that the person felt they had good reason not to believe in him. What, you think a perfect god would be so ignorant that he would think atheists just hate him? How can you hate something that you don't even believe exists? God isn't stupid, if he exists. He knows all and understands all. If you think anything other than that, then you're wrong. Seems I understand the concept of your god better than you do, and I don't even believe in him.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:26:17
There is no hell, Lawrence. Only the one you create in your own mind.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:34:53
That I agree with.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:36:59
@Shoegazer- The only problem with your concept of God is that it disagrees with the 'handbook' for that particular faith, and most others.

But, if we're going with other theories, here are a couple that seem to half-way make sense based on empirical evidence:

"Hell is empty; all the devils are here."
~William Shakespeare

“We are each our own devil, and we make this world our hell.”
~Oscar Wilde
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 00:48:42
@Shoe- Perhaps Buddhism is more your cup of tea.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:55:38
Kranz, it's funny, my therapist suggested Buddhism to me as well.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:56:21
@SG- Yeah, I definitely would stay away from Hinduism.

Sure, like I've never heard all those before. How about extrabiblical historical references which mention Jesus as a real and living person and verify that he was in fact crucified by Pontius Pilate? There are several of those not 'written by Jesus' buddies' (and BTW, only a few books of the New Testament were written by people Jesus knew personally).
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:57:03
But as Ferris Bueller said, a person shouldn't believe in an "ism", they should believe in themself.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:57:16
@Kranz- Ever read "Be Here Now?" It was mentioned in that video I posted @you in GC.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 00:58:17
BIB, I'm not saying that Jesus didn't exist. I absolutely believe that he was a real person. But as for being the son of god? Hogwash. More likely his mom was a wh*re who got knocked up when she shouldn't have, claimed that "god did it", and accidentally started a religion.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 01:02:12
@SG- Have heard the 'Roman Centurion' theory before too. Again, if you wanna spend a few hours in Guild Chat sometime, I'd be 'happy' to debate it all (even though I swore I was done with all that), but we need to shut it down on this wall. Sorry I started it. Really just wanted to let people know that pic was reported & removed before... and nothing more.
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 01:17:26
@BIB- I've nit read it, but bet your buns I'm gonna! (:^D)
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 01:23:24
@Kranz- I had a High School teacher who was big-time into all that Baba Ram Dass (aka Dr. Richard Alpert) "Be Here Now" and Maharishi Mahesh Yogi/TM stuff. He got me hooked into some of that, mainly Richard Bach's trilogy - "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" (life-changing), "Bridge Across Forever" and "One." Good reading.
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 01:41:31
@BIB- Funny story; I was at a party with my (then) girlfriend and the assbag hosting was flirting with her by trying to shove his collection of Ram Dass down her throat. More than likely an attempt to shove something else down it. This was in like 98, I was *still in my 20s, so I had to give him the old gangster slap. (:^p). So that's why I've been reluctant to read any of his work. See how the mind works?
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 01:51:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPOfurmrjxo
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 02:43:22
I'm sorry too. But just know that you're not going to change my opinion, just like I'm not going to change yours.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:01:30
@Shoegazer- You'd be *amazed* how many times in my life that my opinion *has* changed and how many religions I've followed at various points, and how much studying I've done of them all (and the funny thing is, eventually I sorta came full circle). It's always healthy to continuously re-examine one's belief system, especially anytime 'new information' is presented.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:04:57
Jayzuz I love threads! My take is this - you go to Heaven for the climate; you go to Hell for the company! As for god (the imaginary one upstairs, not Creator), there is absolutely no proof He exists (even the rabid feminists had him as a she..........................wait a moment..............God is Here...............in the form of Bailey Jay!!!!!!!) Yay!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:10:58
God is inside all of us. So is the devil. We are all capable of good or evil. The choice is up to humans. There is no invisible hand guiding us to either one. Too many people need a crutch in the form of god or satan. I, however, do not. And neither do millions of others.
Blacklist user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-02-02 03:19:31
@BIB- You've done some serious soul searching. I love that, man. I seem to be getting around to that myself. Your religious background and mine aren't so different. At the end of the day, I only want to do what's right.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:25:20
I grew up with very religious surroundings, reading the bible all the time, so I have some knowledge of it. My opinion is that if the whole world were atheist, there would be a lot less war. Most of that is based on religious beliefs.
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:26:09
I believe that God/god, regardless of what form we might assign to him, is not limited to the personal views or whims of greedy "clergymen" or Popes. God merely is. He does not hate. He does not love. He just exists. I believe that we are here to enjoy the privilege of life, love, misery, confusion, death, hatred, hope, and the ability to dream. God has never had these; therefore he created us so that we might experience what he never could. I don't *know* any of this, but I do believe it. So, that is my #2cents. :)
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:30:56
That's not bad, Templar. That's a theory I could get behind.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:33:32
I'm so *very* sorry I started this. My policy (now, after a couple of 'painful' decades of head-banging on walls) is generally not to engage anyone for any reason about politics, religion, and a few other topics. This is why. I don't generally do it unless someone slaps me square in the face about *mine* first, then I almost can't stop myself. I'm sorry (for being a man of conviction and passion? If that requires an apology?) Please just report/justify the damn picture on the *proper* grounds and forget I said anything at all.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:35:43
It's mostly my fault, BIB, and for that I apologize. Anyway, I justify the pic because Raquel is damn hot!
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:44:32
No one has anything to be sorry about! This is debate and exchanging of views. Although none of it has anything to do with feet we are exchanging views and getting to know each other better. It's a by-product of WikiFeet. And it's refreshing to not have a Deputy Principal shoving her views down our throats in a "you-know-nothing" manner.
Blacklist user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:49:25
@Grik I agree and it was a civilized discussion and none of that "your an a**hole" or any other cut downs or shows of dis-respect:)
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:52:11
I have to agree too, Grik. The way I look at it, we can disagree on anything, because what brings us all together is FEET! We all love feet, and we'll always have that. I think that's a pretty damn cool connection we all have here.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:54:05
[Member since: Sep 2010]
Nah, the sad thing is we're *not* exchanging views. If you only knew... I have cogent and well-researched answers for *every* question that has been raised here, and I can go for *hours* from only what is in my head... no reference, no notes, no Google. It's just the wrong time & place to do that & we should never have even gotten started down that road. I merely wanted to let people know that picture *will* offend many people for several reasons, *one* of which is 'religious sensibilities.' At least (most) Christians won't put out a fatwa about you and then sentence you to death, like one major religion seems to do if you make fun of their prophet. But 'poor taste' isn't a reason to report a picture. "Adult Content for BDSM" *is* a valid reason.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 03:58:13
It's not BDSM though. You're telling me that any picture of anyone tied to anything can be considered adult content? That's BS.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:01:28
It's not as if anyone here would say" "Mohammad she's hot!!!'
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:02:14
Or "She gives me a fatwa!!!"
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:02:57
She's causing a Jihad in my pants!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:03:22
This is off-topic, but just wondering...why does literally everyone but me have beer as their profile pic?
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:08:17
@Shoegazer- Go read the LONG thread on Megan Fox's wall. Your question will be answered.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:10:29
Okay, lol.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:11:14
@Shoegazer- Yes, any woman tied up in any way is by definition bondage and any bondage is *here* considered "Adult Content." Even screencaps from mainstream TV/film. You obviously belong to the Guild, since you are answering unapproved comments. Do you ever go to the Guild page and read Chat or the Announcements? The 'official' avatar theme for this two weeks, chosen by @Smoothsole, was to use @Admirer1's last avatar (the beer mugs one) as a tribute to him. Or see the long thread about him and the avatar tribute on Megan Fox' wall.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:14:43
Yeah, I just read it. I technically have a drink in my avatar, in the bottom right corner it's a bottle and glass of Campari. Does that count? Or should I do the beer thing too?
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:15:24
Also, is Smoothsole a girl?
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 04:22:19
I didn't notice that at first. I used to
LOVE Campari and soda years ago!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:27:25
Sweet! That pic is from the Campari calendar from last year!
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:28:50
@Shoegazer- Up to you, depending on how well you knew @A1. Re @Smoothsole- just like a religion, it kinda depends on what you believe based on what there is some pretty good evidence of, yet there is no visible proof available right now! :) Yes, I'm sure she is what she claims she is. Several others here are *not* so sure, and one theory is that 'she' is really @Grik. Both she and Grik get a kick out of that theory.
Blacklist user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:29:23
Sad, but I've grown so used to checking if there is nudity, feet showing (by the definition of the site) that I was oblivious to the content here, which I myself consider offensive and inflamatory. I was also unaware it was removed previously. So, despite uploading the shot. I am reporting it as adult content for bondage ( join me if you wish) (grab the shot if you wish) the choice is yours.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:33:07
I don't think I really knew @A1 at all, so I'll stick with Uma, but I'll pour out some Campari in memory of him.

That's hilarious about Smoothsole possibly being Grikess!
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:33:19
It won't bother me if you take the picture down. I'm storing it in my 'archive'.
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:38:27
If @Smoothie = @Grik, that means that I have flirted with him. Ugh!!! I doubt that this is true. Only Mr. Eli Ozer (or Gil) knows the truth about that.
Blacklist user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-02-02 04:44:26
Wink, wink.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:47:38
@T97- TWO of the Orange Guilders are *firmly* convinced it's a 'known fact' and both of those even *claim* to have some form of proof that they cannot disclose. One of 'em just winked. The other says #timewilltell
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 05:45:18
I have a *new* theory- perhaps... @Mr Hate is really @Smoothie!
Yeah... that's *got* to be it, and explains a lot! ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 05:49:58
That would make more sense considering
how well thought out all those puns were!!!
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 11:09:20
HATENESS is ADAMANT Smoothness and Grikness are 1 and the same ( hence the nudge, nudge, wink, wink above). Stuffed if I know how he comes to this conclusion. I've forgotten. It's funny to me.. I still love Hateness. It's Black or White in his world. No grey matter. Maybe if Smoothness accidentally used GAMOTO one day then it's a fait accompli
Blacklist user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-02-02 14:19:09
Your so paranoid @Grikness. I was just having some fun. Wink, wink. LOL!!!
Blacklist user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-02-02 21:01:42
Am I the only one who thinks this sort of "it offends me personally, so I'd like it removed despite it not actually breaking any established rules" thing is kind of awful? How is it not a misuse of the reporting system? There's no "this offends me personally" option when you report. You can't rightly just flag it as adult content for no reason. Under that logic we should be able to flag anyone wearing fur as "adult content". Or what if someone is wearing a band t-shirt from a band that uses dirty words, should we flag that? Inverted crosses are all the rage on t-shirts today, should we flag any pictures where a girl is sporting that sort of thing? I just think that we shouldn't support this kind of misuse of the system. We already have established rules as to what's report worthy. I think it's gonna hurt the community if we just allow people to essentially make stuff up and bend those rules to mean whatever they want. I still can't believe the majority of the community supported the removal of that picture.
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 21:17:04
@777 I know. That energy should have been directed towards thanking the person who rid (albeit temporarily) wikiFeet of the Bailey Jay pictures most recent and being vigilant in keeping them off. See, if 100% of people could agree on something, Eli would have no reason to keep that gallery and others like it. Saving that gallery isn't about "if a gallery can be deleted, others aren't safe." No, if a gallery that truly BELONGS here was to be removed overnight, THEN Eli would suspend that person and bring back pictures.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:18:52
@Mishu777- It was *not* deleted because it 'offends [anyone] personally' but rather because of AC/Bondage. Had nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with being tied up. The 'majority of the community supported the removal of that picture' not once, but TWICE.

@54- Funny, I thought I saw you in Fireside Chat yesterday when Eli explained *why* he hasn't restored the pictures... the system is now split between two server types (to speed it up) and he said it's not as easy as one 'push of a button' now as it was a month or two ago. The person(s) who did it *was/were* suspended the very next day... several accounts. Get your facts straight. Here's another one... @Mishu777 isn't on-board with your agenda, having been one of the *few* true 'voices of reason' on Bailey Jay's comment wall.

I don't understand why you bigots and haters of other humans keep trying to push your failed agenda upon an unwilling site owner. And everyone else.

So you are saying that promoting violence against women is GOOD, but guys who want to be women are BAD, is that right? It's fine for a guy to want to *beat* a woman but not *be* one?
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:30:09
Angus....................are you Bruce Jennering?!?!?!?
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:31:49
Mishu777 is absolutely correct in my view. The picture did not transgress the 'rules' here. Funny that a pic that offends religious beliefs gets kebabed but pics that offend Christian beliefs do not.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 22:44:21
@Grik- Nope, not gonna fly. It had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with a prohibition of bondage as AC.
I can think of *dozens* if not *hundreds* of similar pictures that have been removed for that same reason. None of them involved a cross or any other religious imagery, but all involved women being bound by chains, ropes, shackles, straps, manacles, stocks, etc.

What do you mean am I Jennering? No way I'd do all that, but I *will* defend to the death his right to pursue that course. Hell, I'll even set up a gallery when the work's done. And I won't rest until Bailey Jay is restored, if I have to go find and upload new pictures myself from scratch or from Reesie's archive.
Blacklist user
Reply
54  (user)2015-02-02 22:45:22
@BackInBlack60 I don't see what my reply to 777's reply has to do with "*why*" Eli hasn't restored those pictures.

Dictionary definition of bigot: "A person who is obstinately devoted to his or her opinions." Sounds like whoever worded that definition had an agenda of their own. In cases like this "opinion" is fact. That gallery you like and other galleries like it have no place here. I have no problem with those types being what they are, but wanting to push that on normal people is ok how? There was once a discussion about fat and obese ladies running around in bikinis and other revealing clothing and how they were slammed for doing that. It was agreed that if they DRAW ATTENTION TO THEMSELVES (Examples: Ajay Rochester, June Shannon, Kardashian and many others) they're fair game. While Gabourey Sidibe and certain others should be left alone because they're not out there being fools with neon signs over their heads. Same exact thing goes for the men in those galleries you're fighting for. It would be one thing if Bailey Jay was out in public fully dressed and a picture was taken and that's it. It's a whole other for him to spread his legs more than once and have those pictures posted where they don't belong. Make sense?

You wanted the Raquel Welch picture removed on a STRETCH of a technicality! Raquel wasn't being bound, her mouth wasn't taped, and most of all was never a nude "model." Could it have been deemed offensive? Sure. I'm catholic and at first said, Wow! But I didn't go running for a "Report as ____ ____" button because there isn't one for that picture. I think what was going on with priests in the era that picture was taken trumps a HARMLESS picture. If we're going to have pictures removed on now a stretch of a technicality, how about getting pictures removed that don't jive with the rules Eli has posted currently? I found 3 rules that could get a few sick galleries removed.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 23:05:26
@54>"That gallery you like and other galleries like it have no place here." I do *not* like that gallery *at all* but you are patently wrong when you say it and the others 'have no place here.' YES, they DO, because again, they guy who owns the domain name, runs the computer and pays for the bandwidth *says* they do. My *personal* preference is that they not be here, and that I *never* have to look at them, and failing this, that they should be clearly flagged so that everyone knows what they're looking at (them that like it and them that don't). *My* agenda is defending the rules and the site. I personally don't care what they are or what's here. Unlike others, I just skip what I don't like and move on. I realize that the cross was a Roman torture and execution device *way* before it was ever adopted as a religious symbol.

YOU are the one who was banging this drum loudly and several tiems in Fireside Chat yesterday:

"Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy"

So how about walking the talk, turning off the 'hateful' and turning on the 'classy' rather than taking the moral high ground only when it's convenient to your agenda?

Again, FYI... you might be interested to know that I neither reported nor justified that picture (this time around - I did justify the first one that was pulled a while back).

What *was* going on then? John XXIII & Vatican II?
Blacklist user
Reply
keeperoflostsoles  (user)2015-02-02 23:36:04
im not even gonna read this. Too long. You guys are passionate about something though.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 00:27:13
@Keeper - Yep! TL;DR works. I've done it myself on this site! Not to mention being responsible for a lot of 'em!
Blacklist user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-02-03 03:12:50
Fair enough on the "bondage" thing as opposed to it being removed for religious reasons. But I still can't help but think that we're stretching the definition of bondage, if not just a little bit. The intent of the shot clearly wasn't to imply some sort of sexual nature to bondage or torture. It's a promo shoot from some movie she's in about cavemen and dinosaurs and the like. A PG movie mind you. I could understand if she had a ballgag in her mouth and a look of terror on her face, but she doesn't. I can totally respect that the owner doesn't want this to be an "adult site" and doesn't want any actual nudity or otherwise clearly pornographic material. But let's be honest with ourselves here, this isn't a children's site either and there's likely one main reason people come here and look at these pics. The very nature of this site is fetishistic in it's core. I don't see why we should be overly cautious or conservative in our definition of "sexual content". I don't think it's too hard to draw a definitive line between obvious pornography and "what this site is" with just a bit of common sense.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 03:30:09
I'm totally with Mishu777 on this - PC has reared its ugly head here. The Pic was not all about bondage as its premise - but the puritans 'saw' bondage and that was enough. That is total BS
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 04:01:14
@Mishu- Yeah, you're probably partly or largely correct on most of what you just said, and/or I'm sick of arguing about it. The only point I really take exception with is the same one I hear so often, "We're all here for one and the same reason." Oh, hell no, we are *not* but that ground has all been covered on several walls before. Check here:
http://www.wikifeet.com/Diana_Krall#thewall
http://www.wikifeet.com/Letitia_Dean#thewall

It's never a good idea to try to pigeon-hole people and make the assumption they were all cut from the same cloth or fell out of the same mold... it just doesn't work that way.

The movie you speak of is "One Million Years B.C." from 1966.
The picture in question here (#1493147 B&W or #1588491 color) had nothing to do with that or any other movie. It is merely a portrait of her by famous portrait photographer Terry O'Neill, and was taken in 1968, two years after the movie release. However, the outfit may have been inspired by her 1MM Years BC costume.

One more quick point: The definition of 'Adult Content' on *this* site bears absolutely no resemblance to that definition anywhere else in the civilized world. (For that, take a look at discussions on Riley Reid's and Franciely Freduzeski's walls about stuff the Owner *himself* removed that was in *no* way remotely close to 'AC')
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 04:10:46
@Grik- I guess you missed the part way up there in the thread (feets of strength 2015-02-02 04:29:23) that the uploader *himself* reported the picture and requested that we justify his report if we agreed. I didn't 'vote,' but others did and it's gone now. AND I just posted the 'ghost image' numbers for both versions, so don't blame me.
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 04:15:44
Not blaming you at all Angus - actually, the uploader should have had the courage of his convictions and stuck to the pic. I would have defended it to the death! It was a magnificent pic!
Blacklist user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-02-03 05:19:58
In all fairness I did say "there's likely one main reason people come here and look at these pics". I fully understand not literally EVERYONE comes here for the same reason. But I feel pretty safe in saying that like 95+% do. As for the definition of AC on this site, I guess the owner himself is a bit confused if he's going so far to imply that any thumbnail that could possibly even be mistaken as AC despite it most definitely not being AC should be flagged and removed anyway. But what do we do with that definition? Should we follow up on it and report pictures randomly because "If you stand back really far and blur your eyes it kiiiinda looks like her knees could be boobs"? Or should we all try to come together to find a more solid definition? Or is it just the sort of thing where it's up to the owner and it's random and there's nothing you can really do about it?
Blacklist user
Reply
Templar97  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:02:48
Y'all can dispute and argue about prescise definitions, context, and politically correct site management all day (wait... you did!), but I would like to add that I thought the photo was sexy. Eli, because of the constraints/conditions of his sponsors, would not want this kind of content in his galleries. I totally understand and comprehend this, which is why I saved the photograph in my "naughty archive". If you see a suggestive picture that you like but that you *know* will inevitably be removed, just save the picture for your own personal enjoyment. That would cut down on much of this repeated, futile discussion. The site is what it is what is is, and I'm pleased to have the ability to visit this enormous archive at no cost, anytime I want to view my favorite celeb's feet. What a privilege!!
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:51:39
@Mishu>"Or is it just the sort of thing where it's up to the owner and it's random and there's nothing you can really do about it?"

I think you have an accurate assessment of the sitch there, sir.
You have grasped the concept now.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:56:03
What @T97 said - If you like something, download it and save it, because it may be gone tomorrow (and I'll expand that to *even* if you think it's perfectly safe and won't be deleted). That definitely applies to YouTube also, and many other pages and sites on the web. It's truly like 'the Memory Hole' in 1984 where anything can be and is altered or vanished at any time, 'as if it never was.' Unless you're an archivist with a lotta storage space! ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-02-04 03:56:50
So in retrospect what is the sacred meaning of life & what is the role of the messiah as well?

And was http://bit.ly/1zzC1Jw truly AC? ;)
Blacklist user
Reply
Its Still Real 2 Me  (user)2015-03-20 20:03:42
I can't believe I read this entire thread. Really hammers home the ol' saying "Never talk politics or religion with strangers". It's rarely ever a conversation...I mean, a TRUE conversation...it's just two people (in this case, more than two) squawking at each other about their inflexible beliefs. boring and tedious. Espc. on a foot forum.

Anyway...carry on...
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 20:17:05
@Real- Agree on politics or religion, but...
what do you want to talk about... FEET?
Nothing more boring than *talking* about feet!
Blacklist user
Reply
celebs  (user)2015-03-20 20:21:05
Thanks BiB for waking me up, so far i thought this site is all about *TALKING* feet!
Blacklist user
Reply
Its Still Real 2 Me  (user)2015-03-20 21:18:13
@BIB60: haha I guess I'm getting Vietnam flashbacks from all the religion discussions I've observed and taken part in on the interwebs. Especially on Youtube. Those days are behind me, I'm proud to say...
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:36:29
@Se7en- Yep, been thee, done that & got the T-shirt also and glad I'm done!
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-02-02 02:34:29Ickmeister  (user)
Chicago's finest of all-time sex symbol!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
Panasonic8  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-22 10:13:02
sexiest women on earth
Blacklist user
Reply
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-22 10:21:49
Well, definitely in my Top 10 Hall of Famers!!!
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-02-03 00:09:56GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
@SHOEGAZER: ATHEISTS ARE SOME OF GODS FAVORITE PEOPLE NO DOUBT. YOU SEE AN ATHEIST HAS A MADE UP MIND DOES NOT WAFFLE LIKE AN AGNOSTIC. GOD HIMSELF SAID BURN HOT OR COLD MEANING PICK A SIDE .... HE ALSO SAID HE HAD NO PATIENCE FOR THE LUKE WARM AGNOSTIC, HIS WORDS NOT MINE. I SPEW OUT OF MY MOUTH LIKE WARM MILK .... I BELIEVE HE WILL REVEAL HIMSELF TO US ALL BEFORE THE END IS FULLY COME AND THEN YOU'LL BE JUST AS SURE ABOUT HIM AS YOUR NOT NOW. AS FAR AS FORGIVING YOU THAT IS ONLY IN THE TIME OF GRACE AND DISAPPEARS AFTER THE START OF THE TRIBULATION .... IF YOU DENY CHRIST HE WILL DENY YOU ... BE GONE FROM ME FOR I KNEW YOU NOT .....................................................BUT THAT'S JUST MY OPINION ..... AND STILL I LIKE ATHEISTS
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 00:33:34
@Pop- I like agnostics more than atheists. I find them more intellectually honest. Most of the atheists I've engaged (*not* the ones mentioned here!) have been very hostile people with a huge chip on their shoulder and a big axe to grind. They just want to engage you in debate in a futile attempt to prove their position is correct. Nobody wins those!
Blacklist user
Reply
Johnnys  (user)2015-02-03 00:49:03
What are you doing here guys? Stop that, remember this is a feet forum
Blacklist user
Reply
HD1  (user)2015-02-03 00:54:23
I've seen some atheist here, praying with faith towards some random feet.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 00:59:22
@Johnnys- Agree. Just when I thought it had died down, Pop had to throw another gallon of gasoline on the coals. As I said, I could do this for hours, but this ain't the place.
Blacklist user
Reply
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-02-03 01:05:51
JUST BEING A BURR UNDER THE SADDLE GUYS AND GUY-ETTES AND OF COURSE SUBJECT OF THE NIGHT UNDECIDED. REMEMBER I'M A SELF OSTRACIZED PENTECOSTAL WHAT THE HELL ELSE AM I GONNA DO WITH 35 YRS OF BIBLE STUDY
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 01:13:55
@GS74- I got 45 years under my belt, along with a theology degree from a seminary (yes, Greek, Hebrew, Apologetics & Logic, Ancient History... and much, much more!) and psych degree from a Christian university which also included a bunch more 'Theology' modules.
(:^o)

<sigh> How the *hell* did I end up here?
['They' say it never made that 18-inch leap from my head to my heart!]
Blacklist user
Reply
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-02-03 01:14:09
@BNB: DAMN ............................................................................. NOW THAT WAS FUNNY
Blacklist user
Reply
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-02-03 01:16:18
@BNB: I PROMISE BEING BORN AND RAISED IN THE PENTECOSTAL CHURCH IS PROBABLY EQUIVALENT TO SEMINARY JUST ONE MORE THING WE NEED TO DESTROY A BRISKET OVER
Blacklist user
Reply
catsman11  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 01:43:25
BNB60, we used to call people like you the "knife and fork" members of our church.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 01:45:01
@GS74- I've run the gauntlet, from Baptist to Methodist to Charismatic & Pentecostal to Messianic Jewish to various Churches of God, interspersed with stints in New Age (really a blend of Hinduism and Buddhism) and Wicca! What a journey.

BEST thing about church: Fellowship meals!

Briiiiiiisket... Mmmmmmm. ~(_8^(p)`````````
Blacklist user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-02-03 01:46:01
Best thing about church? Not having to go.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 01:49:50
@Catsman- Yes, some are pillars in the church; I'd like to think I was more like a pillar of Spam or meatloaf.

We had a poor family out of the hills with a weird dad, toothless mom, and about 10 badly neglected kids who used to attend *only* on monthly fellowship meal day, and brought nothing for the pot-bless meal, ever. No one begrudged them, figuring that may well be the only decent meal those kids had all damn month. It was sad. Now the kids are in foster care and the dad is in prison for life for abuse and neglect (including sexual abuse of two of the daughters) and the mom is in for 20 for neglect and failure to stop the sexual abuse. Very, very sad.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 01:51:07
@Mr Hate - Yeah, but then you don't get to ogle all those little old ladies with their tan pantyhose and white chunky-heel sandals that you're always raving about!
(:^p)
Blacklist user
Reply
keeperoflostsoles  (user)2015-02-03 02:04:36
Look, you old cats gotta stop. Lol. GO LOOK AT YOUNG FEET!!!! I love you guys, but damn.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 02:12:36
@keeper - That's just a good comedic 'callback' there.
A few times @Hate has accused us of chattering on the walls
"...like a bunch of little old ladies at a church social with their tan pantyhose and white sandals!"
Blacklist user
Reply
keeperoflostsoles  (user)2015-02-03 02:23:19
Lol! Well, I'm not @Hate. I'm Keeper. WAIT..........I HEARD A SQUEEL!!!!!!! I must go.
Blacklist user
Reply
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-02-03 02:37:25
WHAT CAN MESS UP NEXT
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 05:16:23
Oh Christ... (pun intended)

Gemini, you sound a lot like a Jehovah's Witness with that "Tribulation" theory.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 05:38:26
Hey, is there some kind of ban on me or something? Because I can't make any new posts, and all of my old posts are gone from everywhere. Yet I can still reply to posts. WTF is going on?
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:11:46
@SG- I see *all* your posts. But you're not the first one to complain that you can't post. Try rebooting? Only for others, it's the replies, not new posts, which seem to be blocked.

Nah, Pop doesn't sound JW at all... He's just spouting the standard Pre-Trib Rapture doctrine/timing, same as I did for a couple decades before I went and studied all that out and concluded it's just not there at all via sound exegesis, only via eisegesis (approaching the topic with a predetermined paradigm and looking only for that which supports it).
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:29:25
It was like that for me yesterday too. I've rebooted since then and it's still the same. My old "replies" still exist, but every new topic I started is completely gone, and I can't make any new ones.

I grew up as a JW, and they teach the same thing. Basically, they say that everyone's sins will be forgiven up until Armageddon, and then after that will begin a thousand-year period where everyone will be judged on everything they do, and if they pass the test after that period is over, then they will gain everlasting life.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:49:05
@SG- That's weird! All I can suggest is writing Eli at kreshnov@gmail.com and explaining the problem best you can, and yes, you're the only one I know of who's having that exact problem. Were your OP's approved, then vanished, or is it possible they were rejected?

I was trying to recall the JW position on all that and knew there was some odd catch, which I now think is that only 144k will 'fully make it' into Heaven & everyone else spends eternity on earth after the millennium.

Parts of that are fairly standard mainstream Christian doctrine, with the discrepancies involving mostly timing of events (Pre- Mid- or Post-Trib 'rapture' for example) or what exactly happens to whom before, during & after the Millennium. Gee, we could have a big time discussing all this if only it weren't merely a foot f̶e̶t̶i̶s̶h̶ admiration site! LOL. Plus, I burned my politics and religion soap boxes some years ago, and generally just don't discuss any of it for reasons *just like this* - it just goes on and on with no resolution, so what's the point? Why don't we all just wait and see what happens in real time, eh?
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 07:11:41
My OP's aren't showing up at all. I click "submit" and then nothing happens. I refresh the page and there's nothing there. Maybe I will write to Eli. Thanks for his address.

Yeah, I grew up constantly hearing about the "hundred and forty four thousand". There was even an old woman in our congregation who claimed to be one of them, and of course everyone believed her. She died a while ago, so supposedly she's in heaven now and she can see me trashing her on a foot website, lmao!

Yeah, I agree that it's basically pointless to discuss this stuff over and over. We're wasting the time that we have on earth (the time that god gave us, if you believe in him) by debating where it all came from, when really, none of us can know anything until we die, if even then. I do enjoy discussing it with you though. Makes this place even more fun!
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 07:26:38
@SG- AHA! OK. Then you're *not* the only one with the problem. It's not that your posts aren't showing up... it's that the 'submit' button isn't working all the time. Before you refresh, copy your post (into the clipboard with Ctrl-C), then refresh and try again, pasting (Ctrl-V) your comment into a new comment box. Then cross you fingers, blow on the mouse, and hit 'submit' again. As I told others, make sure your browser and Flash plug-in are the current versions. Other than that, write Eli, but feel free to tell him this is happening a *lot* to a lot of people. It happens to me fairly often on A/R of comments, especially if there are more than one on the same wall. Works once or twice, then stops & have to refresh. But it doesn't happen to me on submitting *new* posts, and only happens on replies if the reply contains a picture number and/or a web link. (Workaround is the same - Copy, refresh, paste, submit again - always works 2nd try).
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 07:30:13
Okay, thanks! I'll try that.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 07:33:00
Okay, I just treid that FIVE TIMES in a row and it didn't work. After I press submit, the whole box disappears, and nothing shows up. And if there is something wrong with the submit button, that doesn't explain why all of my old OP's disappeared too. Something is going on here.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 07:42:27
OK, well you got FIVE POSTS showing up on this end. So it's something not diplaying on your device. Yeah, you gonna have to write Eli. He's really busy right now & not doing much e-mail, so your best bet is to put something like "BUG REPORT - HELP PLEASE? - CANNOT VIEW MY NEW COMMENTS" in the subject line.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 07:44:20
@SG- If you *can* see those, I'd retract them, or at least not post anything else that will get rejected... too many rejected comments in a short time might trigger autoban.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 09:05:55
Oh shit! I didn't think anyone could see them! Well, I can't retract them, but I won't do anymore. Thanks again, I'll try Eli again
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 09:11:13
@SG- Well, four of them got deleted pretty quickly, and now I think the fifth one is gone... and you're still here, so it's all good!

I'm curious to know what you find out, because this is one I've never heard of before tonight!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 09:21:22
Thanks! I'm curious to know what I find out too, lol.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-02-02 05:05:07Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Whoa, it's gone...our great conversation is gone. I was just going to ask how does one become an Orange Guilder?
 
Reply
Blacklist user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 05:15:56
@SG- Approve/Reject 50,000 comments. Easy. We all did it inside of a year.
Blacklist user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)2015-02-03 06:12:04
Easy, BiB? Hogwash! I've been a member since '08 and yet somehow I'm STILL not allowed in Guild Chat despite the fact that I have contributed more *original* content than nearly anyone else here. That said, you and I have had the discussion before that there appears to be someone in this group that absolutely (there goes that word again...) despises screen shots and reports every one he comes across as PQ, regardless of whether or not it indeed is.

I approve/reject comments when I have the time. I've been doing so since the idea's inception, yet I am just now cresting 400+. This page made my 410th. Madness, I say!

Just my two cents about the conversation above, in reference to this comment: "God isn't stupid, if he exists. He knows all and understands all. If you think anything other than that, then you're wrong." Coming from someone who says he doesn't believe in God, he presumes much about said being. Assuming such a being exists, and assuming that being knows and understands *ALL*, I think it's safe to say that anyone who presumes to understand such a being's motives and capacity for knowledge is "wrong," most assuredly.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:27:24
@Spanky- It really is easy. If by 'contributions' you mean picture uploads, that has no bearing at all on Guild status; *only* the comment evaluation counts. But it's very, very easy to get into Guild Chat at 500 Guild Exp... it can be done in a weekend most of the time. I just checked, and I've accumulated about 450 in the last 36 hours or so! I was just kidding about the 50k being easy... it wasn't, although everyone who has done it has done it in just 12 months, since the inception of the Guild on (IIRC) 02/09/2014 (or thereabout).

I also agree with your 2¢ on the other topic, although he says he was raised in a very religious environment and spent years reading the Bible. But I agree... it just ain't possible for a finite human mind to fully comprehend the infinite and the eternal... now *there* are some absolutes & superlatives!
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 06:37:11
@Spankynuts>"I've been a member since '08"
Of what? *This* account "Spankynuts" was registered September 2010 (Same as mine! Classmates!) but if my facts are correct, I believe the site didn't even exist yet in '08 (In an article about the site, Eli is quoted as saying "I started working on wikiFeet in August of 2008") and I believe the date of all the original uploads from Eli's personal archive are dated 04/09/2009, so that's probably the actual 'birthdate' of the site (the day it went live with actual photo content).
Blacklist user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)2015-02-03 07:18:31
That was an approximation, BiB. I KNEW it was a long time, and I was thinking it was back when my wife and I first got engaged, but evidently not.
Blacklist user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)2015-02-03 07:23:11
In other words, I wasn't trying to pull the wool over anyone's eyes. I just knew that I'd been on here, commenting, raging against The Foot Critic (with everyone else) way back before the Guild, and before Hannah Montana became Miley Cyrus - and subsequently sexy, and (unfortunately) before there were any real site guidelines, per se'...back when more than half the comments on here were of the most vile, disgusting, and ill-conceived perversions imaginable, hahaha.
Blacklist user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)2015-02-03 07:49:34
Always loved this phrase, taken from the novel, "All Quiet on the Western Front," if I'm not mistaken: "There are no atheists in the trenches." Meaning, when the bombs are exploding all around you and you know your time is nigh, you ARE praying to someone. Whether you believed before or not, you're hoping like hell all the doubts you ever had were misplaced, lol.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 08:33:00
@Spanky- I thought of that one, but it's so hackneyed plus I just figured, "What's the point?"

When I was a young man, my father-in-law used to say that people pretty much are what they are, and rarely ever change very much. Knowing we all have great capacity for change, I thought he was just an old cynical, jaded curmudgeon. Now he's dead, and I've taken on his cynicism about the propensity of people to pretty much just get locked in to how they are and what they believe. So why worry about it?
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-02-02 21:22:16  Iluvfeet  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Timeless beauty and #wetfeet
 
Reply
Blacklist user
Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-03 00:00:59
She would be my all time fave babe. Magnificently sexy. her feet are so horny. Looks like there was a cool breeze blowing when this was taken. She is both #skyfeet + #wetfeet.
Blacklist user
Reply
2015-02-02 04:00:40Grik  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
She's ready............and I'm willing..............and never the twain shall meet!
 
Reply
Blacklist user
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:05:09
Back dat ass up, Raquel!
Blacklist user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:13:15
That is... RFG, WFG and LFG
Ready, Waiting and Looking for Grik
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:20:43
And eventually SFSG: Settle For Shoegazer.
Blacklist user
Reply
toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 04:39:19
Aha, stealin @Griks thunder I see
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 05:05:31
She's so old now she couldn't run away from either of 'em!
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 05:10:23
Is this gallery locked or something? I can't post a new comment.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 06:46:43
Is it possible to ban Lawrence2 from this site? He has been harassing me on here as well as on youtube, going to every video I comment on and saying something perverted. He has crossed a line.
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 06:57:54
The guy in your avatar scares me less than you do.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 07:01:06
@Shoegazer- Short answer: "Probably not." He *has* been banned before, but was recently fully reinstated under his 'legit' username, but was always here under numerous SPAs anyway.

Hopefully, the Guild will reject any harassing or inappropriate comments from either of you (or any of us). Other options:

#1- Meet him in Guild Chat (aka "Thunderdome") and work it out there, which is what the Admin always wishes will happen
#2- Posting a poll to ban a user requires about 75-80% consensus... very tough; only been tried two or three times, and no user has ever been banned this way
#3- Simply use the 'Block User' button, then you won't have to see any of his comments anywhere (except Chat, for now)
#4- Write the Admin and ask for his help ("Talk to @L2") but I can almost guarantee he will refer you back to Option #1 or #2

Or this...
@Larry- Care to come to Chat and talk about this some more? You've only mentioned it once or twice in passing... anything about your issues with @Shoegazer and your reasons for them. Care to elaborate and discuss with him or any of us??? Or care to back it down until he provokes or attacks you directly?
Blacklist user
Reply
Shoegazer  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 07:15:54
Thanks, BIB. I think I will block his ass.
Blacklist user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-02-02 07:19:21
Retracting comments towards you, blocking you as well. peace
Blacklist user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 07:22:02
Good idea @Shoegazer he wants an audience, without you he'll go on pestering others. I find blocking certain individuals increases my enjoyment here a lot.
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 07:25:21
@feets - That's basically what I just said in Chat. As *you* well know from professional experience, it's rarely *all* one person's fault when conflict arises. Sometimes there are just two people who mix like oil 'n' water - just doesn't work.
Blacklist user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 07:33:39
I think the thought that everyone can work it out in Guild chat is fanciful, but mush of our fearless leaders thinking is overly idealistic, a good trait that can be taken too far. I find blocking on social media makes things more enjoyable for everyone even those of us who are bystanders. Conflict is rarely the respectful sharing of ideas people hope it will be, at least not without significant guidance and discipline ( and I get paid for that).
Blacklist user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 08:01:06
@feets - I agree on all points there, especially what I consider to be an extremely naïve and Pollyanna attitude on most issues. I've wondered if it's a factor of age, or just a personality type, and if it would change significantly after a number of... disappointing experiences ("empirical evidence to the contrary" i.e. "Life and people take a series of massive dumps on you...")
Blacklist user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-02 08:07:17
I have to admit to a perverse joy when I see naive newbie therapists, slowly become as jaded as myself. But you learn by being burned by certain experiences, if you continue to stick your hand in the flame after that it becomes a pretty significant character flaw.
Blacklist user
Reply
46 wall posts left