BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-02-10 22:34:30
We even ran a poll on the subject about a year ago and it disappointingly had little support... it drifted off the bottom of Polls, but I think it was about 55-60% who *didn't want them and the rest didn't care. :(
I agree... I don't want to see kids (we agree) or guys (we disagree) in my photos, but the Admin doesn't agree. He has said many times that only the 'primary target' (named celeb) counts for Underage. Beyond that, he recently suspended a user for 'false reports' of a bunch of these in another gallery.
Toe (user)2016-02-10 23:33:07
I 2nd both of you.
GEMINISTALLION74 (user)2016-02-10 23:40:43
ToothpickTorture (guild knight)2016-02-10 23:58:18
As long as kid have shoe it's OK for me.
Toe (user)2016-02-11 00:52:06
For me, ONLY if the child can be cropped out without ruining the subject of the photo in my own collection.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-02-11 01:12:22
@Toe- Oh, you mean like THIS???
ToothpickTorture (guild knight)2016-02-11 01:15:36
I only say this because in some instances it can't be helped (children in background,rare finds) and of course no kids in my private stash as well.
Toe (user)2016-02-11 01:29:24
@BIB - Nooooooooooo! I mean, everything. So that if you were browsing my collection and saw the pic, unless you already knew the photo, you would never know that there had been a child in it. They are rare photos, but show up every now and again. Beyond that, I'm against it and voted against uploading them in the last poll.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-02-11 01:36:06
I wonder 1) if it's time for a repeat poll on that topic and
2) if it would even do any good upstairs if we 'won' a decent majority.
@Toe- I just thought it was a hilarious thread, despite the gravity of the subject.
Toe (user)2016-02-11 02:27:27
Doesn't cost anything to try.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2016-02-11 02:31:28