Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
sterne - 3324
(1.96% reported)
celebs - 2386
(0.42% reported)
Shanghai Red - 1743
(2.18% reported)
Grik - 1652
(8.78% reported)
toelover143 - 1352
(1.48% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Natalie Dormer

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 7.5 US edit
Nationality: United Kingdom edit
Rating stats (1018 total votes)
710
beautiful
208
nice
74
ok
17
bad
9
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info67 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Natalie Dormer's feet, also liked:
Alison Brie
Rita Ora
Odette Annable
Rooney Mara
Mary Elizabeth Winstead
Got anymore Natalie Dormer Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2015-02-24 19:46:33DouglasSaltire  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Sweet baby Jesus and the orphans...this is just stunning, even if you don't have a foot fetish, this pic will give you one. Madly beautiful girl with feet to die for. Amazing!
 
Reply
Block user
Worship  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-02 01:01:53
Amen, brother. She'll always be my #1
Block user
Reply
2015-02-16 05:44:41thereem25  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
OH MY HOLY HELL!!! Excuse me while I wipe the drool off my laptop!!!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-13 22:34:16Grik  (user)
The issue I have with pics like this here in WikiFeet is that pics like this should be in a separate section here called "WikiShoes. We have a glimpse of toe cleavage, and a barely visible arch. More importantly, flaws in the feet are not detectable.

This is not a pic the true believers enjoy; rather it is a pic the genuine fetishists deviates salivate over.

Now, in case you are wondering what I mean by "true believers" a good definition is this: "TRUE BELIEVER. 1 : a person who professes absolute belief in something. 2 : a zealous supporter of a particular cause." In other words, feet in all their pristine glory. Note emphasis on the word "feet"! It is borderline Fanaticism, which is a belief or behaviour involving uncritical zeal or with an obsessive enthusiasm for a pastime or hobby. Philosopher George Santayana defines fanaticism as "redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim";[1] according to Winston Churchill, "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject". By either description the fanatic displays very strict standards and little tolerance for contrary ideas or opinions.

Hence why I find pics like this to the right objectionable here. The object of the desire is the footwear; not the foot.
 
Reply
Block user
jebb  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-12-14 07:56:10
Last time I checked insteps were still considered part of the foot, some people think certain body parts can be beautiful, that shouldn't be so hard to understand here.
Block user
Reply
buppa  (user)2014-12-14 08:15:25
@Grik I share your sentiment.
Block user
Reply
Novaro  (user)2014-12-14 09:26:11
@grik i thought we were here to admire the feet not pick out their flaws
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2014-12-14 09:44:13
Jebb, agree it's down to personal opinion. Novaro, go to June Shannon, Susan Boyle, or Oprah Winfrey walls, and let me know if you admire anything there?!?!
Block user
Reply
ash31t  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-14 09:49:59
In this case, we should have two different section with "barefeet" and in "shoes".
Because we a part of feet in this pictures, event if it is not toes or soles.
You have to think of the preferences of everybody, not only yours.
Block user
Reply
Mr anonymous  (user)2014-12-17 00:15:58
I love these pictures. I like the arch just as much as toes and these pictures show off the arch very nicely. The arch is a massive part of the foot so they definitely shouldn't be in a different section
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2014-12-28 18:18:28
Grik, you sing and dance as well as anyone, but you're totally full of propaganda crap in branding those who don't share your exact taste in feet as "genuine fetishists deviates" while implying that the 'True Believers' (usually the biggest perverts on the site) are 'normal' somehow or even a majority here.

You know better than that, yet you do it anyway.
Block user
Reply
Dr.Bob  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-12-28 18:56:03
i'm with Grik on this.
Imho the emphasis on this site should be feet, not shoes, not socks, not legs.
The siteowner pays the dues, so its his decision what kind of images can be hosted here and everyone has to accept that.
Flaming does not help anyone, so cool down please.
Block user
Reply
catsman11  (user)2014-12-28 19:20:10
I see nothing wrong with posting a photo like this....we see toe cleavage, arch...it's a keeper.
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 19:28:38
There is just not enough arch showing for my liking.
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 19:37:20
And allowing fully enclosed shoes like this are the reason some of the damn galleries have liteerally thousands of pictures. I agree with Grik and Hate, enough is enough. We have to draw the line. No need to report it though, as it will just get unreported. The rules here have gone out the damn window. What's next? Socks? Fully enclosed high heeled thigh high boots? WTF?!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2014-12-28 19:41:51
Dr.Bob- I wasn't entirely serious, but only people who know the relationship between Grik and me would know that. He's just trying to wind us up, and we're letting him. It was merely my intent to poke him back, not buy into his 'trolling' (I use the term in a loose sense of 'being deliberately provocative' or by his own admission, "a sh*t-stirrer").

The site owner *has* set rules, and they say any picture that shows sole, toe *OR* arch is a valid upload. They have been exactly the same since the site began, and I don't understand why people keep saying anything has changed. All that has changed is false reporting without consequences is gone now.

I'm actually with Mr Hate on this and say it's legal, but juuuuust *barely* so, but my intent wasn't to argue about the picture; rather, to point out Grik's highly-charged language intended to start just such controversy as this.

Whether this borderline pic stays in the gallery, I do not care.
Block user
Reply
AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 19:59:48
The issue with "false reporting" and the consequences is that we all can't agree on what is good!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2014-12-28 20:03:34
Does that ever happen anywhere in the real world?
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 20:07:34
The arch is clearly visible in this pic to report it is false reporting there are many many pics on this site where arch is questionable THIS is NOT one of them IMHO:)
Block user
Reply
Curves  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-16 03:13:23
You will not find one who values arch more than I do, so I feel that I have standing to weigh in on this. I would defend a pic like this, even if only a small amount of arch was peeking up; yet here we have a photo that goes all the way back to where the curve of the heel is beginning. This is a keeper, any day of the week.

Try to remember, not every photo has to be chock full of detail. Sometimes just one extra photo showing only a small amount of the foot is needed from just the right angle for one to build a complete mental model of the foot. Also, and I am not speaking for myself in this case, remember that some people actually enjoy a bit of the tease that some occlusion provides. Even if you find it distracting, it may help them gain a better understanding of that celebrity's feet.
Block user
Reply
nonema  (user)2015-02-16 04:03:47
Guideline states:
"All uploaded pictures must show toes, soles or arches. If they don't, please report them as "No feet". Shoes and socks aren't really what wikiFeet is about."
Ergo - is that picture has any of the above - toes, soles, arches?
Block user
Reply
2015-02-16 02:45:56inToeNeatoe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Wow. Piks of her toes get better and better. May need to move her up to my top 5.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-02-11 18:55:26Revenger  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
33 kisses to Natalie's feet and toes. Valar Morghulis
 
Reply
Block user
2015-02-11 15:49:42T1  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
If perfection could have another name...its gonna be a long time for me to get over this.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-02-06 12:33:22Silver89  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
omg this woman...
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-29 16:40:27ChronoWarrior  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I know why she seems so happy...
King Joffrey is dead...
Anyway, nice feet...
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-29 15:16:10Boba Foot  (user)
Lola Bunny come to life.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-08 23:49:34Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@BiB- Do you believe in Reincarnation? Who'd have thought that in a past life you were a gluttonous, debauched tyrant?!? ; ) #chaiselongue
 
Reply
Block user
REVAN™  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-12-13 00:35:32
In other words, he was Jabba the Hutt. ;)
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2014-12-29 19:49:31
@Smoothie- If that were me, I'd be on my knees on the floor, not up there pawing at her like a cad. But as far as reincarnation, @ILF and I have determined from our observations here that we are both coming back as the dogs of hot celebrity ladies.

@REVAN- Exactly! That was me...
"A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away."
Block user
Reply
2014-12-28 20:16:16AverageJoe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: No Feet Showing
To add to GRIK's comment below, this one is even harder to define to me. I still say this IS NOT WikiSHOES.
 
Reply
Block user
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2014-12-28 20:26:40
OK, so report #1516909. It's very, very borderline and I would support its removal. You can *barely* see an arch... or much of anything else below the ankle really.
Block user
Reply
Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-29 16:01:00
Yeah thats a shoe pic. I've confirmed the report
Block user
Reply
2014-12-28 18:05:30sethym  (user)
Anybody know where this is from? She appears to have full-fashioned stockings on, and I'd love to see more of that.
 
Reply
Block user
sethym  (user)2014-12-28 19:02:09
Update: Found it. It's from a 2012 London stage production of a play called After Miss Julie. There's a few more pics available through Google/Images of her sitting on that table in, yes, fully-fashioned stockings. Alas, most of the photos are quite tiny and get pretty pixelated upon enlargement attempts.
Block user
Reply
2014-12-16 21:03:46Smoothsole  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Wow! I've always been a fan of Natalie but I don't think that her feet have ever looked better than they do in this pic. STUNNING! Great upload @MrHate, Love you xx ; )
 
Reply
Block user
REVAN™  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-12-16 21:28:54
No "Wink Wink"??? ;)
Block user
Reply
2014-12-14 06:26:16jebb  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
She's stunning.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-13 22:23:08inToeNeatoe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Wow, gorgeous in every way. Awesome toes, killer arches.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-13 00:32:08Tarantino23  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Thank you for the better quality Mr Hate.
I can't resist this woman!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-12 17:45:34Duant  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
man, what a goddess......
 
Reply
Block user
toeloverforever  (user)2014-12-12 18:02:08
with sexy feet
Block user
Reply
2014-12-11 15:15:25  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Pictures 1539303 & 1539296 are upgrades over pics 1534676 & 1534677. Slightly smaller but overall better quality.
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-07 04:20:41legend00115  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Wow!!!! I want one like these....
 
Reply
Block user
2014-12-07 03:23:23  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)
Nice Arch!
Nice upload from our new champion uploader!




Joubert: [handing Turner back the .45 he'd taken from him earlier] For that day.
#1532451-52
and
@Silver89's #1516908-09
 
Reply
Block user
26 wall posts left