jebb (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-12-14 07:56:10
Last time I checked insteps were still considered part of the foot, some people think certain body parts can be beautiful, that shouldn't be so hard to understand here.
buppa (user)2014-12-14 08:15:25
@Grik I share your sentiment.
Novaro (user)2014-12-14 09:26:11
@grik i thought we were here to admire the feet not pick out their flaws
Grik (user)2014-12-14 09:44:13
Jebb, agree it's down to personal opinion. Novaro, go to June Shannon, Susan Boyle, or Oprah Winfrey walls, and let me know if you admire anything there?!?!
ash31t (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-14 09:49:59
Because we a part of feet in this pictures, event if it is not toes or soles.
You have to think of the preferences of everybody, not only yours.
In this case, we should have two different section with "barefeet" and in "shoes".
Mr anonymous (user)2014-12-17 00:15:58
I love these pictures. I like the arch just as much as toes and these pictures show off the arch very nicely. The arch is a massive part of the foot so they definitely shouldn't be in a different section
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-12-28 18:18:28
You know better than that, yet you do it anyway.
Grik, you sing and dance as well as anyone, but you're totally full of propaganda crap in branding those who don't share your exact taste in feet as "genuine fetishists deviates" while implying that the 'True Believers' (usually the biggest perverts on the site) are 'normal' somehow or even a majority here.
Dr.Bob (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-12-28 18:56:03
Imho the emphasis on this site should be feet, not shoes, not socks, not legs.
The siteowner pays the dues, so its his decision what kind of images can be hosted here and everyone has to accept that.
Flaming does not help anyone, so cool down please.
i'm with Grik on this.
catsman11 (user)2014-12-28 19:20:10
I see nothing wrong with posting a photo like this....we see toe cleavage, arch...it's a keeper.
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 19:28:38
There is just not enough arch showing for my liking.
AverageJoe (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 19:37:20
And allowing fully enclosed shoes like this are the reason some of the damn galleries have liteerally thousands of pictures. I agree with Grik and Hate, enough is enough. We have to draw the line. No need to report it though, as it will just get unreported. The rules here have gone out the damn window. What's next? Socks? Fully enclosed high heeled thigh high boots? WTF?!
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-12-28 19:41:51
The site owner *has* set rules, and they say any picture that shows sole, toe *OR* arch is a valid upload. They have been exactly the same since the site began, and I don't understand why people keep saying anything has changed. All that has changed is false reporting without consequences is gone now.
I'm actually with Mr Hate on this and say it's legal, but juuuuust *barely* so, but my intent wasn't to argue about the picture; rather, to point out Grik's highly-charged language intended to start just such controversy as this.
Whether this borderline pic stays in the gallery, I do not care.
Dr.Bob- I wasn't entirely serious, but only people who know the relationship between Grik and me would know that. He's just trying to wind us up, and we're letting him. It was merely my intent to poke him back, not buy into his 'trolling' (I use the term in a loose sense of 'being deliberately provocative' or by his own admission, "a sh*t-stirrer").
AverageJoe (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 19:59:48
The issue with "false reporting" and the consequences is that we all can't agree on what is good!
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-12-28 20:03:34
Does that ever happen anywhere in the real world?
tweety (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-28 20:07:34
The arch is clearly visible in this pic to report it is false reporting there are many many pics on this site where arch is questionable THIS is NOT one of them IMHO:)
Curves (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-02-16 03:13:23
Try to remember, not every photo has to be chock full of detail. Sometimes just one extra photo showing only a small amount of the foot is needed from just the right angle for one to build a complete mental model of the foot. Also, and I am not speaking for myself in this case, remember that some people actually enjoy a bit of the tease that some occlusion provides. Even if you find it distracting, it may help them gain a better understanding of that celebrity's feet.
You will not find one who values arch more than I do, so I feel that I have standing to weigh in on this. I would defend a pic like this, even if only a small amount of arch was peeking up; yet here we have a photo that goes all the way back to where the curve of the heel is beginning. This is a keeper, any day of the week.
nonema (user)2015-02-16 04:03:47
"All uploaded pictures must show toes, soles or arches. If they don't, please report them as "No feet". Shoes and socks aren't really what wikiFeet is about."
Ergo - is that picture has any of the above - toes, soles, arches?