TheRealLoverBoy1 (guild knight)2015-03-13 20:48:30
Confirmed #1629105-9211 as pq.
ptbc (user)2015-03-13 21:23:09
Thank you. Way to many PQ uploads in this section lately.
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 17:13:34
Apparently the "judges" of this website approve swearing in comments but uploading a medium quality picture is illigal ?! Give me a break ! These are the ONLY pics that EXIST! Take'em or leave this section empty and hollow for ever !!!
DVDExpert (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 19:20:25
Its true. So stop reporting pictures, which you think are "poor quality".... its better then leave the gallery empty forever!
You guys are always talking about the site guidelines, right? Then what about this: "When deciding whether or not to report a picture as "Poor Quality", keep in mind that sometimes a poor quality picture is better than no picture at all."
feets of strength (user)2015-03-20 19:38:15
Long a frustration to me and many other uploaders on the site and the fact is most of the people who report don't read or care about the actual guidelines. I've stated before,if you think a pic is poor quality, go out and find one of better quality, problem solved, it's too easy to report and remove photos and it discourages those who try to contribute to the site.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-20 19:57:38
We've been after the Admin for months to do something about this very issue.
It really discourages me from wanting to upload, especially into rare galleries.
What @DVDExpert said. And what @Feets of Strength said. Every word.
celebs (user)2015-03-20 20:03:45
My dear GGF, with your hard work this gallery is no longer a rare gallery, thus so many positional dups must be deleted to bring this gallery into rare category and that will give u chance to upload some other captures as well
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 20:12:38
The positional dupes are mind numbing here even if this is a start up gallery.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-20 20:23:07
I also agree with @Mr Hate, w/r/t *this* gallery and the Kohler screen-caps.
Iluvfeet (guild knight)
- rated (nice feet)2015-03-20 20:32:42
Whatever happened to common sense and discretion?
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-20 20:36:33
Never seen such a thing on this site!
Huh? What's that?
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 20:54:32
Could you clarify sir , what do you mean pos dupes are mind numbing ? I assure you there aint a single dup pic ! Check Lindsey's head. Its moving
feets of strength (user)2015-03-20 20:57:58
The belief is if the feet are in the same position on the same shoot. it is a duplicate, is it anal and obsessive compulsive, yes, but that is the interpretation.
feets of strength (user)2015-03-20 21:00:57
May I say that I can never have enough photos of a celebrity I enjoy, but if I ran this site much would be different, clearly I don't. BTW thank you for contributing no-one says that enough on here.
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 21:06:00
Site guideline states: When considering a large amount of pictures from the same event (Red Carpet, Movie stills, etc.,) the feet of the celebrity should be positioned differently in each picture, other wise they will be deemed duplicate and should be reported as such.
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:06:03
With all due respect Ser Guild Knight , celebrity feet websites aren't about discretion but popularity. And Lindsey's feet deserve to become as popular as Selena's or Emma's . But only if you bann the joker who like ruining our hard work. I'm not saying you shouldn't remove a no feet pic , but don't remove half a wave of 50 pictures without pity . Don't be such quality-junkies guys. After all this isn't the billionare Emma Watson. The girl's a youtuber trying to make a living by playing online and around the world. She cant really afford a high quality supercamera and thus i can't bring you better pics than these!
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 21:08:15
@GGF....rules are rules. I follow them too.
feets of strength (user)2015-03-20 21:08:58
I can think of other sites that the contributers post with the caveat "some pics MQ", "sorry if there are any dupes", and they are excellent, this site needs a strong dose of Anafranil or Luvox for OCD.
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:10:28
Plus quantity ( not quality ) is the deciding factor of a galleries succes!
feets of strength (user)2015-03-20 21:11:47
The funny thing is there are people on here who post the same boring red carpet shot thousands of times and no-one says a word
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 21:16:34
That's odd @feetsofstrg....I read that complaint everyday.
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:28:00
Rules don't change the fact that these are the only pics of Lindseys feet out there and the highest quality directly from her cameraman Mason!
TheRealLoverBoy1 (guild knight)2015-03-20 21:33:42
Consider "gff" for example, if someone creates a new gallery with pure pitch black pics then they should be reported as "pq" ---> many of these uploads are nearly as "pq" imo however others may differ and thereby *un*report them <--- that's way the votes work.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-20 21:33:51
Also, while you may be a huge Lindsey Sterling fanboy who just can't get enough, the *average* user here is first of all presumably here to mostly focus on feet, so 50 pictures with the feet in *exactly* the same position is perceived as a 'duplicate,' even if her hand moves from her waist to her hip, or she has a Mona Lisa smile in one and is grinning like the Cheshire Cat in the next. Secondly, despite that, again to *most* of us, about half a dozen or a dozen *very similar* pictures of anyone, anywhere is *plenty!* You might care; most users won't, and only see a full page of clutter, of essentially the same thing, and that they may not even like, and have to go through most of a page to see any other different picture.
Hope that explains *why* the rule exists. Careful uploaders like @Mr Hate will go through that 50, pick out maybe six or eight of the *very best* of them (focusing on feet in various positions as the priority), and then let the rest go by. Then some idiot who cares *only* about boosting the quantity of the pictures he uploads, without regard for quality, will upload the other 42 just to 'pad' his stats
Looks, guys, especially @GreekGirlFeet... First of all, as Mr Hate says, they aren't *our* rules, they're the ones the Site Admin/Owner set up, and it is his money & time that allows us all to enjoy the site. Just like real-world laws, we either agree with them or try to get them changed through proper channels, but until that happens, we are all subject to them.
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 22:37:21
Idiot equals GreekGirlFeet ? And i don't care about my stats ! I serve the Stirlingites! And i will see this section THRIVE !
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 22:39:08
I didn't ask why the rules exist ! I just stated that rules are irrelevant when the truth is that the only better pictures of Lindsey are the ones already uploaded years ago !
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-20 22:51:48
@GreekGirlFeet- To be clear, if I understand your last two posts, are you saying that regardless of these warnings and explanation of the rules and the rationale behind the uploading and reporting rules, you refuse to comply and will upload whatever you like?
Grik (user)2015-03-20 23:23:05
GGF, Malaka, she isn't even Greek! As for being a "Stirlingist" whatever that is, all yours. As for her feet, I remain clueless as to their quality, and there is barely enough evidence here of their existence.
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 00:53:16
Ellinaras eimai kai Stirlingite tha pei fan tis Lindsei Stirling . No BlackInBlack60 completely incorrect i said there are no better pics out there. Why don't you guys contact her or her camera man and complain directly? Send her an email saying" Hey Lindse you should focus the camera on your sexy feet" or something.
Grik (user)2015-03-21 01:01:45
Levendi, until that happens, no excuse for you uploading crap here. Katalavenis?!
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-21 01:23:10
@GFF- I don't dispute that 'there are no better photos out there.' They look fine *to me* but quality is a matter of opinion, and there are people here who think that anything less than a 2000x3000 HQ is "Poor Quality." The issue here is uploading pictures that violate the Site Guidelines for uploading. I wonder if you read those? Half a dozen or even ten of each set would be perfectly fine... 40-50 is *not* cool, like that street scene. Her feet are *not* in fifty different positions, and like it or not, that is the rule. You can also express you dissatisfaction about that via the 'Contact Us' button.
feets of strength (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 02:16:14
Some of these are quite good, I don't think they are crap, and you can't get better quality than that of the original photograph, the folks who judge quality by counting the number of pixels are simple-minded and wrong. BiB60 makes many good points however, and picking the best shots from each photoshoot,will give you a greater chance of getting them past the reporting goons. My suggestion is join the guild and meet the requirements to participate in guild chat in time for the next fireside chat with the site creator on April 1st. There are a lot of frustrated uploaders here, who would like to hear your input.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-21 02:22:07
Correct. Again, already covered by the Site Guidelines:
►When reporting a duplicate picture, make sure you report the lesser quality one and not the better copy. -->>Please don't rely on resolution alone and check the actual pictures.<<--
@Feets>"...the folks who judge quality by counting the number of pixels are simple-minded and wrong."
feets of strength (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 02:34:55
BiB60 it's not just wrong it's lazy, there are people who report by resolution without ever viewing the picture in any form other than thumbnail, this is especially true with reporting duplicates, the best copy isn't necessarily the one with the higher resolution, but most people simply follow the numbers. It's great to have site guidelines but if most people don't follow them and there is no reinforcement or responsiveness from the top, what use are they. Given that state of chaos I'll side with the folks who upload everything but the kitchen sink over the anal retentive, obsessive compulsive reporters who would limit content to the extreme.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-21 02:51:12
But maybe that's being an "anal retentive, obsessive-compulsive reporter!"
@Feets- I've had pictures reported (and some removed) for things like 'No Feet Showing' when there was an entire *bare* foot in view, but in the toenail pic, kind of blended in with the couch pattern. Reporting pics off the toenails is a crime, indeed. When I'm comparing duplicates, I open both to full resolution and flip back and forth between tabs many times.
tweety (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 03:06:36
@BiB60 you know me and computers very little knowledge of but when comparing dups that is how I do it also sometimes people "blow-up" pics and it takes away clarity while the OP pic while smaller is better resolution that is when the "new" one while bigger gets my vote as a duplicate:)
feets of strength (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 03:12:58
@BiB60 Aside from underage reporting (for obvious reasons) I subscribe to the belief "that he who reports least, reports best." I think there are people who report with a pathological zest here, no I don't include you, but I find this kind of thing drives me from the site more and more and leads me to upload less and less. This guys overdone enthusiasm for uploading pics of Ms. Stirling bugs me far less than the zeal to wipe it away.
54 (user)2015-03-21 03:20:55
@feets of strength - Well written! Agree.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-21 03:25:42
My #1 complaint is allowing any user, at any time, for any or no reason, to damage content here. That simply *should* not be allowed to happen, ever.
I wrote an honest appraisal of the advantages & disadvantages of this site in answer to criticisms about us (some legitimate) on another foot site here:
tweety (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 03:29:45
Also should have added if the two pics are too close to call for my eyes I just leave it alone for the rest of the guild to decide:)
TheRealLoverBoy1 (guild knight)2015-03-21 03:37:12
Good debates re. this issue.. & I recommend bringing this very thread str8 to the admin's view next fireside day.
feets of strength (user)2015-03-21 03:47:42
@tweety To your point. Twice in the last 2 days I uploaded duplicate shots because I could not determine which were better, apparently no-one else could either since neither duo was reported (unless no-one was paying attention Kathy Smith Tanya Roberts).I often post and let others decide if it is worth staying put. I'm trying to let the reporting bug me less but, as must be evident here, with only minimal success.
@BiB60, A very insightful critique of wikifeet your main frustration is also mine and the lack of concern from above makes me believe the status quo will remain.
celebs (user)2015-03-21 03:56:21
Its a good tactics to alternate two different images to escape getting caught for dups, i like it, however dups remains dups
GreekGirlFeet (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 13:14:29
BlackInBlack60 yes its a matter of opinion and taste which means that while a guy may like spread toes another may like an arch or a sole shot or feet in a slightly different position. Therefore 50 pictures of the same filmset are ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!