Welcome to wikiFeet.

Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2628
(0.76% reported)
toelover143 - 2301
(0.30% reported)
Elwood99 - 1976
(0.30% reported)
Shanghai Red - 1666
(2.28% reported)
ToothpickTorture - 1527
(3.41% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Lindsey Stirling

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 6 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (397 total votes)
251
beautiful
73
nice
49
ok
14
bad
10
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info203 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Lindsey Stirling's feet, also liked:
Jennifer Aniston
Keri Russell
Emma Watson (II)
Tori Black
Little Caprice
Got anymore Lindsey Stirling Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2015-04-26 00:05:31feetslover  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
ho Lindsey, thank you for this beautiful view, you know how to make us happy
 
Reply
Block user
2015-04-15 07:48:25Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
Been a huge fan of her music since the very first time I heard "Crystallize." And although she is quite good at ballet, as well as music, she looks goofy as hell prancing around with that violin. It also affects her playing live. I can hear numerous mistakes in her live performances, and I am fairly certain it's from all the movement...duh. I've been a guitarist for almost 30 years and I STILL play better sitting still, in a chair, than I do standing and moving around. As Laura Ingraham says (and I'm not a fan of hers, necessarily), "Shut up and sing." Or in this case, Sit Down and Play.
 
Reply
Block user
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-15 08:01:39
@Spanky when it comes to guitar playing you really need to talk to @BiB60 or @ILF they really know their guitars and playing of them both pretty talented musicians on guitars:)
Block user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-04-15 08:43:11
Oh yeah, BiB and I have talked shop quite a few times :)
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-04-15 21:41:32
Oh, Spanky...


...my sweet Summer Child...
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-04-15 22:03:04
I frequently also yell, "Shut up and DRIVE!" to people on cell phones. Every musician knows although you can play AND sing (piano, guitar, drums, bass, whatever) you can do either one BETTER if you only do that. And I don't dance with my 'cello.
Block user
Reply
Kranz  (user)2015-04-15 22:07:02
@BIB- You don't dance with your cello, but you DO wear leather tights and football helmet while playing, don't cha?
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-04-16 03:55:38
Hold up.

I can sing and play guitar/bass/drums/piano with equal levels of aptitude. They taught us syncopation at Berklee & NECOM.


And Melora Creager can sing...and play the cello...and work a petalboard...at the same time. So...to say "every musician" is a bit of a stretch, hon. We're like fingerprints: we're all unique. :)
Block user
Reply
DVDExpert  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-19 04:20:59
She looks good doing both things and its her thing to do both things.... so why should she stop doing it? She is winning awards left and right.... so to be honest, I don't care about a few mistakes, as long as she looks hot doing them.
Block user
Reply
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-04-19 04:24:29
@MZ PIXXX I CAN PLAY ALL THOSE THINGS EQUALLY WELL TOO..... NEVER HAD A LESSON.....IT ALL SOUNDS BAD.....REAL BAD
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-04-19 04:34:10
@DP- OK, *most* musicians. I've performed singing and playing, but would have to *honestly* say one or the other or both suffer *at least a little* (usually the vocal part). I also text and drive all the time, and have never had any problems, so maybe it's not 'distractive driving' to *everyone* but there is a reason they passed a law about it for the 'average' driver.

I've heard many musicians mention that it's *harder* to do both at the same time, and in fact all my college music instructors taught this as a 'given.'

@GS74- Pop, I only know two songs...
One is awfully simple, and
The other is simply awful!
Block user
Reply
2015-02-08 14:54:58GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
You people should first LEARN what Dublication means and THEN report a picture as dublicate ! Dublication means an EXACT copy of the same frame ! Lindsey slowly raises her foot here ! There is no dublication in the next or the previous picture you can clearly notice that the foot is more and more raising and changing shape with each frame so please you noobs out there ( not everyone ) think ! THEN act! Thanks
 
Reply
Block user
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-02-08 21:29:08
And right to add.. only the area *where her feet are* counts while the rest of the picture is neutral per site duplicate guideline.
Block user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-04-15 10:07:20
Hate to be the one to call you out like this, because I DO appreciate many of your uploads, but I'm pretty sure no one at all knows what "dublication" means. Of course, I know you mean "duplication," but before you start lambasting others for not knowing the definitions of words, it might be wise to learn the spelling of that word. I am guessing English is not your first language, and so I am being as nice as possible.
Block user
Reply
Levendi  (user)2015-04-15 21:50:01
Dublication is what Dixxxxie does to you in Dublin
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-04-16 03:57:50
@Levendi - The only thing I do in Dublin is absolutely nothing because I avoid Northern Ireland like the plague.

#SouthernIrishAndProud
Block user
Reply
2015-04-14 19:10:45danelectro  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
With awesome shots of sock removal! And great views of her and a friend's feet!
 
Reply
Block user
Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-04-15 07:51:41
Her friend has some pretty dogs too.
Block user
Reply
Hodor  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-15 21:03:42
That video is basically all we could ever ask for. She did huge service to her foot fans, lol.
Block user
Reply
2015-04-15 20:06:03Ickmeister  (user)
Hey, beautiful!
 
Reply
Block user
2015-04-15 06:57:59Spankynuts  (user)
What the....
 
Reply
Block user
2015-04-02 02:51:19feetslover  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
she seems so sweet to wake
 
Reply
Block user
2015-04-01 22:16:07vontedrago  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Removed: Poor Quality
Hmm...can't say about this photo
 
Reply
Block user
feetslover  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-04-02 02:47:00
I added this photo
Block user
Reply
2015-04-01 22:10:50DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Nice Jimmy Choos, Lindsey.

And congrats on getting the one pair that didn't fall apart after three steps.

Also...those are some cute toes. ^_^
 
Reply
Block user
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-04-01 22:24:29
Hey DP is that Lisbeth Salander aka Noomie Repace in your avatar?
Block user
Reply
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-04-01 22:26:39
Yessir, it is. The TRUE Lisbeth Salander...
Block user
Reply
2015-04-01 22:07:48GCFP  (user)  -  rated (ugly feet)
Such a nice and lovely girl - why does she have such ugly shaped toenails ?
 
Reply
Block user
DeadlyPixxxie  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-04-01 22:09:49
She's a dancer, so her feet are naturally going to be a bit jacked...but for a dancer, they're DAMN NICE....just like her.
Block user
Reply
2015-03-28 22:36:35GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
I can't believe she won 2 echo's in a row and appeared twice in official German TV! How can you not love such a girl/woman. She is the George Lucas of music industry!
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-27 03:14:53GrassHopperWrestlng  (user)
Well, if you're offering, then sure!
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-27 01:50:14footsiefoot reborn  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
She is smart, fun, talented and beautiful she is awsome.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-27 01:23:01korvfisk  (user)
Lol, i uploaded the same 2 pictures 1 minute after :D
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-23 18:55:45vontedrago  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
love your cd cover.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-23 18:06:49GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Dang it ! Was just about to upload these myself ! Anyway nice job whoever outdid me this time props man....or girl. Awesome music video and nice shots. You're quick ....or have a super duper internet and pc ...or both ..whatever keep it up !
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-13 20:35:36ptbc  (user)
Great, 500 more pics of blurry goodness. This section's quickly turning to shit.
 
Reply
Block user
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-13 20:48:30
Confirmed #1629105-9211 as pq.
Block user
Reply
ptbc  (user)2015-03-13 21:23:09
Thank you. Way to many PQ uploads in this section lately.
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 17:13:34
Apparently the "judges" of this website approve swearing in comments but uploading a medium quality picture is illigal ?! Give me a break ! These are the ONLY pics that EXIST! Take'em or leave this section empty and hollow for ever !!!
Block user
Reply
DVDExpert  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 19:20:25
You guys are always talking about the site guidelines, right? Then what about this: "When deciding whether or not to report a picture as "Poor Quality", keep in mind that sometimes a poor quality picture is better than no picture at all."

Its true. So stop reporting pictures, which you think are "poor quality".... its better then leave the gallery empty forever!
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)2015-03-20 19:38:15
Long a frustration to me and many other uploaders on the site and the fact is most of the people who report don't read or care about the actual guidelines. I've stated before,if you think a pic is poor quality, go out and find one of better quality, problem solved, it's too easy to report and remove photos and it discourages those who try to contribute to the site.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-20 19:57:38
What @DVDExpert said. And what @Feets of Strength said. Every word.
We've been after the Admin for months to do something about this very issue.
It really discourages me from wanting to upload, especially into rare galleries.
Block user
Reply
celebs  (user)2015-03-20 20:03:45
My dear GGF, with your hard work this gallery is no longer a rare gallery, thus so many positional dups must be deleted to bring this gallery into rare category and that will give u chance to upload some other captures as well
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 20:12:38
The positional dupes are mind numbing here even if this is a start up gallery.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-20 20:23:07
I also agree with @Mr Hate, w/r/t *this* gallery and the Kohler screen-caps.
Block user
Reply
  Iluvfeet  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-03-20 20:32:42
Whatever happened to common sense and discretion?
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-20 20:36:33
Huh? What's that?
Never seen such a thing on this site!
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 20:54:32
Could you clarify sir , what do you mean pos dupes are mind numbing ? I assure you there aint a single dup pic ! Check Lindsey's head. Its moving
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)2015-03-20 20:57:58
The belief is if the feet are in the same position on the same shoot. it is a duplicate, is it anal and obsessive compulsive, yes, but that is the interpretation.
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)2015-03-20 21:00:57
May I say that I can never have enough photos of a celebrity I enjoy, but if I ran this site much would be different, clearly I don't. BTW thank you for contributing no-one says that enough on here.
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 21:06:00
Site guideline states: When considering a large amount of pictures from the same event (Red Carpet, Movie stills, etc.,) the feet of the celebrity should be positioned differently in each picture, other wise they will be deemed duplicate and should be reported as such.
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:06:03
With all due respect Ser Guild Knight , celebrity feet websites aren't about discretion but popularity. And Lindsey's feet deserve to become as popular as Selena's or Emma's . But only if you bann the joker who like ruining our hard work. I'm not saying you shouldn't remove a no feet pic , but don't remove half a wave of 50 pictures without pity . Don't be such quality-junkies guys. After all this isn't the billionare Emma Watson. The girl's a youtuber trying to make a living by playing online and around the world. She cant really afford a high quality supercamera and thus i can't bring you better pics than these!
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 21:08:15
@GGF....rules are rules. I follow them too.
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)2015-03-20 21:08:58
I can think of other sites that the contributers post with the caveat "some pics MQ", "sorry if there are any dupes", and they are excellent, this site needs a strong dose of Anafranil or Luvox for OCD.
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:10:28
Plus quantity ( not quality ) is the deciding factor of a galleries succes!
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)2015-03-20 21:11:47
The funny thing is there are people on here who post the same boring red carpet shot thousands of times and no-one says a word
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-03-20 21:16:34
That's odd @feetsofstrg....I read that complaint everyday.
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 21:28:00
Rules don't change the fact that these are the only pics of Lindseys feet out there and the highest quality directly from her cameraman Mason!
Block user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-20 21:33:42
Consider "gff" for example, if someone creates a new gallery with pure pitch black pics then they should be reported as "pq" ---> many of these uploads are nearly as "pq" imo however others may differ and thereby *un*report them <--- that's way the votes work.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-20 21:33:51
Looks, guys, especially @GreekGirlFeet... First of all, as Mr Hate says, they aren't *our* rules, they're the ones the Site Admin/Owner set up, and it is his money & time that allows us all to enjoy the site. Just like real-world laws, we either agree with them or try to get them changed through proper channels, but until that happens, we are all subject to them.

Also, while you may be a huge Lindsey Sterling fanboy who just can't get enough, the *average* user here is first of all presumably here to mostly focus on feet, so 50 pictures with the feet in *exactly* the same position is perceived as a 'duplicate,' even if her hand moves from her waist to her hip, or she has a Mona Lisa smile in one and is grinning like the Cheshire Cat in the next. Secondly, despite that, again to *most* of us, about half a dozen or a dozen *very similar* pictures of anyone, anywhere is *plenty!* You might care; most users won't, and only see a full page of clutter, of essentially the same thing, and that they may not even like, and have to go through most of a page to see any other different picture.

Hope that explains *why* the rule exists. Careful uploaders like @Mr Hate will go through that 50, pick out maybe six or eight of the *very best* of them (focusing on feet in various positions as the priority), and then let the rest go by. Then some idiot who cares *only* about boosting the quantity of the pictures he uploads, without regard for quality, will upload the other 42 just to 'pad' his stats
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 22:37:21
Idiot equals GreekGirlFeet ? And i don't care about my stats ! I serve the Stirlingites! And i will see this section THRIVE !
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-20 22:39:08
I didn't ask why the rules exist ! I just stated that rules are irrelevant when the truth is that the only better pictures of Lindsey are the ones already uploaded years ago !
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-20 22:51:48
@GreekGirlFeet- To be clear, if I understand your last two posts, are you saying that regardless of these warnings and explanation of the rules and the rationale behind the uploading and reporting rules, you refuse to comply and will upload whatever you like?

Is that correct?
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-03-20 23:23:05
GGF, Malaka, she isn't even Greek! As for being a "Stirlingist" whatever that is, all yours. As for her feet, I remain clueless as to their quality, and there is barely enough evidence here of their existence.
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 00:53:16
Ellinaras eimai kai Stirlingite tha pei fan tis Lindsei Stirling . No BlackInBlack60 completely incorrect i said there are no better pics out there. Why don't you guys contact her or her camera man and complain directly? Send her an email saying" Hey Lindse you should focus the camera on your sexy feet" or something.
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2015-03-21 01:01:45
Levendi, until that happens, no excuse for you uploading crap here. Katalavenis?!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-21 01:23:10
@GFF- I don't dispute that 'there are no better photos out there.' They look fine *to me* but quality is a matter of opinion, and there are people here who think that anything less than a 2000x3000 HQ is "Poor Quality." The issue here is uploading pictures that violate the Site Guidelines for uploading. I wonder if you read those? Half a dozen or even ten of each set would be perfectly fine... 40-50 is *not* cool, like that street scene. Her feet are *not* in fifty different positions, and like it or not, that is the rule. You can also express you dissatisfaction about that via the 'Contact Us' button.
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 02:16:14
Some of these are quite good, I don't think they are crap, and you can't get better quality than that of the original photograph, the folks who judge quality by counting the number of pixels are simple-minded and wrong. BiB60 makes many good points however, and picking the best shots from each photoshoot,will give you a greater chance of getting them past the reporting goons. My suggestion is join the guild and meet the requirements to participate in guild chat in time for the next fireside chat with the site creator on April 1st. There are a lot of frustrated uploaders here, who would like to hear your input.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-21 02:22:07
@Feets>"...the folks who judge quality by counting the number of pixels are simple-minded and wrong."
Correct. Again, already covered by the Site Guidelines:

â–ºWhen reporting a duplicate picture, make sure you report the lesser quality one and not the better copy. -->>Please don't rely on resolution alone and check the actual pictures.<<--
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 02:34:55
BiB60 it's not just wrong it's lazy, there are people who report by resolution without ever viewing the picture in any form other than thumbnail, this is especially true with reporting duplicates, the best copy isn't necessarily the one with the higher resolution, but most people simply follow the numbers. It's great to have site guidelines but if most people don't follow them and there is no reinforcement or responsiveness from the top, what use are they. Given that state of chaos I'll side with the folks who upload everything but the kitchen sink over the anal retentive, obsessive compulsive reporters who would limit content to the extreme.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-21 02:51:12
@Feets- I've had pictures reported (and some removed) for things like 'No Feet Showing' when there was an entire *bare* foot in view, but in the toenail pic, kind of blended in with the couch pattern. Reporting pics off the toenails is a crime, indeed. When I'm comparing duplicates, I open both to full resolution and flip back and forth between tabs many times.

But maybe that's being an "anal retentive, obsessive-compulsive reporter!"
(:^p)
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 03:06:36
@BiB60 you know me and computers very little knowledge of but when comparing dups that is how I do it also sometimes people "blow-up" pics and it takes away clarity while the OP pic while smaller is better resolution that is when the "new" one while bigger gets my vote as a duplicate:)
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 03:12:58
@BiB60 Aside from underage reporting (for obvious reasons) I subscribe to the belief "that he who reports least, reports best." I think there are people who report with a pathological zest here, no I don't include you, but I find this kind of thing drives me from the site more and more and leads me to upload less and less. This guys overdone enthusiasm for uploading pics of Ms. Stirling bugs me far less than the zeal to wipe it away.
Block user
Reply
54  (user)2015-03-21 03:20:55
@feets of strength - Well written! Agree.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-21 03:25:42
I wrote an honest appraisal of the advantages & disadvantages of this site in answer to criticisms about us (some legitimate) on another foot site here:

themousepad.yuku.com/topic/140338

My #1 complaint is allowing any user, at any time, for any or no reason, to damage content here. That simply *should* not be allowed to happen, ever.
Block user
Reply
  tweety  (guild knight)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 03:29:45
Also should have added if the two pics are too close to call for my eyes I just leave it alone for the rest of the guild to decide:)
Block user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-21 03:37:12
Good debates re. this issue.. & I recommend bringing this very thread str8 to the admin's view next fireside day.
Block user
Reply
feets of strength  (user)2015-03-21 03:47:42
@BiB60, A very insightful critique of wikifeet your main frustration is also mine and the lack of concern from above makes me believe the status quo will remain.
@tweety To your point. Twice in the last 2 days I uploaded duplicate shots because I could not determine which were better, apparently no-one else could either since neither duo was reported (unless no-one was paying attention Kathy Smith Tanya Roberts).I often post and let others decide if it is worth staying put. I'm trying to let the reporting bug me less but, as must be evident here, with only minimal success.
Block user
Reply
celebs  (user)2015-03-21 03:56:21
Its a good tactics to alternate two different images to escape getting caught for dups, i like it, however dups remains dups
Block user
Reply
GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-21 13:14:29
BlackInBlack60 yes its a matter of opinion and taste which means that while a guy may like spread toes another may like an arch or a sole shot or feet in a slightly different position. Therefore 50 pictures of the same filmset are ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!
Block user
Reply
2015-03-21 08:32:41Hodor  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Man, we really need some HQ pics of her feet, why is she hiding them from us? Maybe insecurity, which is unjustified imho, she should show her feet every day.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-03-20 17:21:25GreekGirlFeet  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Stirlingites deserve better than having more than half of every new wave of pics deleted every single time just becuase some joker or several jokers like to play "create bot accounts and spam report" !
 
Reply
Block user
ptbc  (user)2015-03-21 04:19:54
Nobody's creating bot accounts, you just upload crap pictures more than half the time so they get removed. I don't know why it's so hard for you to understand that many people don't want the section cluttered up with pictures of feet which are such piss poor quality that you would barely be able to identify them as feet if they weren't positioned at the bottom of her legs.

Seriously, quick count here, does anybody (besides GreekGirlFeet) really enjoy looking at pics like #1637205? Anyone?
Block user
Reply
Mishu777  (user)2015-03-21 05:01:26
I must admit that I could do without the whole thing where people upload a frame by frame of low quality pics. But that's no disrespect to Greek, I don't like it when anyone does it. Hell, even if they're perfectly good quality, I never liked seeing like 500 ever so slightly different shots of a celeb in open-toed shoes from the same movie premiere. I'm all for more content, but I just think we need a fine balance. I'd love to see a restriction put on uploads like this. Maybe like around 3-5ish at a time of shots like this.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-21 05:09:28
@ptbc- NO. At full resolution, I can't see a damn thing there but curtains and a door. PQ? More like 'No Feet (or any other body parts) Showing.'

When I've written the Admin complaining about the removal of a picture for NFS or PQ, and he has investigated, he has replied that it takes *several* (cannot publish how many) confirmations from unique users to have a picture removed, and that we're being 'paranoid' for thinking someone is deliberately out to get us. In one case on an NFS report (of a legitimate arch picture), I was told something like 26 people had agreed with the report, and despite it falling within the Guidelines, he refused to restore the picture (SO, I re-uploaded it myself... several times). In another case, I'd just posted an admittedly MQ pic (from social media site) in a brand new gallery I'd opened of an obscure actress. Despite maybe a dozen hard-to-find pics in the total gallery, it was immediately reported 'PQ' by someone, and the Admin said that it was. I pointed him to his *own* rule someone quoted below:

o When deciding whether or not to report a picture as "Poor Quality", keep in mind that sometimes a poor quality picture is better than no picture at all. That goes especially for galleries with very few pictures, or rare finds.

He restored *that* one.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-21 05:12:53
@Mishu-- Good point! Even in my *very favorite galleries* I don't want to see more than a dozen shots from any event, period. Others have suggest some number as low as *six* per event (to allow for different foot views). The Admin more or less agreed with that as being a reasonable number (6-10 tops), and is *considering* ways that might be enforced, even perhaps limiting the number of uploads into one gallery by one user in the same day.
Block user
Reply
2015-03-20 23:17:32Grik  (user)
Removed: Poor Quality
I give up........what am I meant to be looking at?!?!?!?
 
Reply
Block user
  Shanghai Red  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-03-20 23:21:17
EXACTLY!!!!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2015-03-20 23:25:00
I *think* it's the sleeping berth of a train???
Or maybe some kinds sauna?
Block user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-03-20 23:59:31
Or from the #darksideofthemoon :/
Block user
Reply
34 wall posts left