BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-09 05:03:05
Never really found any, but some might say there are toes.
So did I, looking for soles, toes or arches.
Curves (user)2015-03-09 05:40:20
Yeah, there is a portion of toes, but there is outside arch anyway, so just personally, I would consider it a useful enough photo.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-09 05:44:17
@Curves- There is no such thing as 'outside arch' - that's called the 'blade' of the foot & doesn't count. But those toes can, if people want them too. To me, it's almost 'NFS.'
Curves (user) - rated (ok feet)2015-03-09 05:59:44
Well sorry if I'm using my own made up terms, and I understand that it doesn't count. All I was saying is that it's useful to me. Heel is also very important to me, and there's a good bit of that here. I wonder why it would ever be determined that heel or "blade" shouldn't count in the first place.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-03-09 06:35:40
Well, short answer, because that's the rule the site owner set up when he created the site. But... I've wondered that myself, because @Toe was a big 'blade' fan (which he *also* called 'outside arch'), and many have said they are heel (of the foot) fans also. Some like insteps too. But seems like *most* here want to see totally bare feet with toes or soles in full view. You're probably seen the grief suffered by the arch fans, and those pictures are *allowed* but much-hated by many users.