BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-10-01 02:50:38
Don't count on seeing them here, and if anyone posts them, they'll be reported & removed within minutes. Because of course we know 'feet' means only 'bare toes.' [smh]
Toelvr (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-23 14:08:22
Why would they be removed? And i agree bare feet ate best...
Grik (user)2014-12-23 14:33:16
The Perez Hilton brigade would transform WikiFEET into WikiSHOES in no time! They go into translucent orgasmic raptures if they see 0.00004 mm of arch showing. it's like the art "connoisseurs" you see staring at a pic in the art gallery which is 30 feet by 20 feet, light blue the top end and red the bottom end - that's it, and they stand there for hours discussing total mindless nonsense (a bit like 54 talking to himself).
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-12-23 14:43:27
^ ^ ^ Dem's mah peeps.
Toelvr (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-03-18 04:27:00
they were open toe shoes. Completely bare is a treat but limited at best.
Cryptic (user)2015-06-20 04:14:32
Even though the comment was made a while ago it's very true. How many pics are here that were flagged as "no feet showing" when all you can't see are the toes? Begs the question (for those people) women have 10 feet??
ArchLover2013 (user)2015-06-20 06:31:36
When I was younger, I only liked women's arches. As I have grown older, I appreciate all parts of a female including toes, arches (still my fav), soles (love those wrinkles), out step, tops..etc etc