BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-23 23:02:14
Has anyone ever told you you're an idiot?
54 (user)2014-10-23 23:04:30
You're not referring to the Louboutins...
Which closed-toe shoes, idiot? Surely
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-23 23:17:32
@54- Yeah, so I get here to A/R that comment, and *again* half the gallery is reported as 'NFS' despite them *all* being legal under site guidelines. Some of these photos have been uploaded and removed three or four times now. #1490710 was originally uploaded by @Hawk, removed, re-uploaded by me twice, removed twice, and now uploaded by @Remo1. #1481601 by @Hate was also originally uploaded by @Hawk and removed. I've e-mailed the Admin with all the info on each session of false reporting. Hope you'll be in next Fireside chat, and hope you voted on the Guild Poll on this topic.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 01:33:32
I can't wait for these bad reporters to be banned for doing it.
TheRealLoverBoy1 (user)2014-10-24 03:55:47
Sorry idiot but your own personal preferences do not count, so her arch pics are legit capish.
ptbc (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-24 04:05:41
I'm not a fan of just arch shots myself, or just peep toes or just heel pops, so I know where you're coming from. But we don't make the rules on this site. The owner says they're acceptable foot content for the site, so they're allowed to stay here.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 04:17:21
And, I just UNreported them AGAIN. With the time @tweety did it, I think that's the fourth time just today. Eli has to start warning, then banning the reporters, or better, just *remove* the ability to report anonymously. There is no way to hold someone accountable if they are anonymous. Foolish.
feets of strength (user)2014-10-24 04:25:16
If they report against the site guidelines, ban them, if they want to return they have to promise to not report arch pics as no feet, early on when I uploaded material that was deemed inapropriate I was suspended, when I was granted a return, I knew the guidelines of the site very well. I don't understand the double standard about reporters and uploaders.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 04:33:36
@feets- Again, hope you'll come express that to the man himself around the first of next month. It's going to be an interesting meeting, although we lost two of our more vocal and confrontational advocates, @Toe and @Ramboner. They got so disgusted with the state of things they couldn't even wait ten more days.
feets of strength (user)2014-10-24 04:42:28
I'm going to stick it out to the fireside chat, and I will make time to participate. What time will he be available?
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 04:52:58
He often shows up as early as 0600 or 0700 EDT US, stays a few hours, then comes and goes the rest of the day and night until he goes to bed or feels we've covered everyone's concerns. Easier to catch him early in the day, like before Noon Eastern Time (US).
feets of strength (user)2014-10-24 04:53:54
I'll be there.
idiot756 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-24 05:00:51
I didn't report the pics. They're just annoying when they're all that gets posted. The overreaction to what I said is unwarranted. One or two of them once in a while is decent, but you know, I come to this site to see feet. Just giving my opinion--Who would imagine?
feets of strength (user)2014-10-24 05:09:12
@idiot756 It's like complaining about pics of toes or soles, feet by the guidelines of the site show one or more of the three. Maybe you didn't report the pics, but the fact is the site is be vandalized by people who do. You have every right to your opinion but don't be so squemish by the negative opinions it elicits.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 05:17:04
I come to this site for pics JUST LIKE the ones being deleted again, and again, and again. What boggles my mind is why people can't just skip the f*** over what they don't like, same as I do. I have to weed through dozens and dozens and dozens of pictures of blue jeans and flip flops, fugly-ass shoes like Birkenstocks, pictures with kids and dudes, and pictures of ONE toe peeping out from under a floor-length gown. Do I report them and have them removed because I don't *like* them? NO. I skip over them and look for what I *do* like, leaving those for the *other* users who are here to view that content. Because it's supposed to be a 'collaborative wiki site,' not a 'destroy anything I don't like' site.
tweety (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-24 05:21:00
@BiB60 I Toe tally agree why can't people just skip the shots they don't like boggles my mind too:)
feets of strength (user)2014-10-24 05:23:59
What is this "amazing technology" of which you speak @BiB60 that lets you skip over the pics you don't enjoy. Is this that human inteligence thing I've been hearing so much about. Amazing.
joker999 (trusted uploader) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-24 05:30:56
Jesus I hope he gets the message.
tweety (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-24 05:30:57
@fos I think I seen something about this on the History Channel LOL :)
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 05:41:28
Why, it'd be these, Feets o'Strength:
1) Eyeball movement: Left, Right, Up, Down
2) Peripheral Vision
3) Reticular Activating System (RAS)
4) Mouse movement, Left, Right, Up, Down
5) Good sense & common courtesy to other users
AYE, there's the rub! I think #5 is our problem.
@feets of strength>"What is this "amazing technology" of which you speak @BiB60 that lets you skip over the pics you don't enjoy?"
54 (user)2014-10-24 05:44:26
While you're here, are you at liberty to say if that start up company ever got off the ground? Google I think it was. lol
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-24 06:02:06
Why yes, @54, that little upstart has sprouted wings and I just suggested to @Toesman55 over on Jordana Brewster that he learn how to use it because we're all sick of being his research librarian.