Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
sterne - 2843
(1.09% reported)
celebs - 2039
(0.49% reported)
toelover143 - 1945
(0.93% reported)
Shanghai Red - 1582
(0.57% reported)
Uncle Creepy - 1383
(0.07% reported)
privacy statement

Kelly Reilly (I)

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 8 US edit
Nationality: United Kingdom edit
Rating stats (378 total votes)

 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
∨ Skip down to wall ∨

People who liked Kelly Reilly's feet, also liked:
Kylie Minogue
Jodie Foster
Nicole Kidman
Jennifer Lopez (I)
Isla Fisher
Got anymore Kelly Reilly Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-05-07 21:49:45kyzerjuno  (user)
In the movie "Heaven is for real" They showed her soles! Their hot! :D
Block user
nopolishplease  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-20 20:54:44
..so then the REAL question is finding out WHERE in the movie that is... because there isn't a chance in HELL (or heaven, or imaginationland, or middle earth, or ______ fill in any make believe place in the blank lol) I'm going to be watching "Heaven is for real"... not even for her absolutely perfect feet
Block user
BackInBlack60  (user)2014-09-20 21:31:35
I have the movie but haven't watched it yet. Now I know what to watch *for!* @NPP- My dad died and was revived; he had an interesting account of things! He didn't want to come back here either.
Block user
2014-09-14 14:48:55bigpapi  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Block user
2014-07-20 16:58:17Pefr1989  (user)
From Calvary.
Block user
2014-05-23 14:04:27Toe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
@LG - I'll take care of those naturals. They look fine to me.
Block user
2014-05-23 13:10:05LG  (user)
Another girl who doesn't believe her feet count. Please, Kelly, let a good, pro pedicurist groom your toenails! Especially for awards ceremonies. Her feet look pretty good, but one can't tell. I'll withhold my rating until she starts getting some care for them.
Block user
2014-04-04 14:41:10toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
love this 1
Block user
2014-04-04 08:00:0754  (user)
BackInBlack60 Wrote: "Just look at Kelly! She's been patiently waiting while we tried to hash out all this nonsense!" You know who really suffered in all this? The one in the "purple" people have asked about (I like her too :) btw). Yes, Ms. Bella Heathcote. Picture #870249 at her gallery - Her expression says it all.
Block user
2014-04-04 06:07:23BackInBlack60  (user)
@Grik> End of issue as far as I am concerned.
Back to beautiful Feet!!!!!!!!

There ya go, my friend. :)
Block user
2014-04-04 05:51:41Grik  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
@Angus, as you can imagine, I am a little peed off, and certain things were said that were an unfair and uncalled for generalisation, which I retract, and apologise for any offence taken.

End of issue as far as I am concerned. If I get kebabed I get kebabed. I've just had my last rant, I'm kissing and making up with all bar the Nein person and the Pixilated one.

Back to beautiful Feet!!!!!!!!

Block user
2014-04-04 04:57:34BackInBlack60  (user)
@Grik- Your calling Guild Chat (elsewhere) a 'Star Chamber' implies a secret and anonymous component. Nothing is further from the truth. Any site member can join the Guild, and any Guild Member can read Guild Chat posts, which clearly carry the username just as on the walls. Only difference is one has to evaluate a measly 500 comments to *post* in Guild Chat, and that's just to keep n00bs & sockpuppets from doing stupid stuff. But basically anyone can read anything written there until it drifts off the bottom of the page. If you'd taken my earlier suggestion and gotten busy evaluating comments rather than ranting on walls, you could be ranting in Guild Chat by now. Don't know why you keep using the wall as a bully pulpit to rail at 'bully girl' when she can't see it anyway and has stated 'there's nothing to debate,' and as you see, I've agreed with *that* point. Let it go, brah. Enjoy the feet.
Block user
2014-04-04 04:15:44Grik  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Pixxie, talk the talk big time but cant walk the walk. For so long as I'm not in Guild Chat, you can keep being tough guy. I'm sorry to get everyone else involved, but I cannot sit back and cop this nonsense. I apologise to others for clogging up Kelly Reilly site with this pap, but I have no other avenue to defend myself because I dont have access to Guild Chat. If I had access, there would be one less tough guy there, not one more. See, for all of you who are not on Guild Chat, the esteemed members 'chat' about things that normally would not be on the walls. Grik has been talked about a lot latelym, as I have just discovered, and a lot of it is unfortunate. It's not what's been said that is the issue - it's not being able to defend myself, have a reasoned discussion, explain a few things etc, that is the issue.

Seems a certain member has a huge problem with me, and she is influencing others to be anti-Grik, under cover of the Guild Chat, and I am not privy to it. That is why I invited debate openly, but she is gutless! And I'm not allowed on Guild Chat to do this privately, and becasue I am doing this here, I am accused of ranting and raving. Give me a break. The rest of you toeing her line (no pun intended at you @Toe, and you are not one of them) are almost lemming-like in your following the Pixxie Piper line of attack.

Fine, I'm a big boy, but one bully girl is actually causing more commotion than one cheeky Grik.
Block user
2014-04-04 03:04:38BackInBlack60  (user)
@Pixxxie - Understand the 'nothing to debate.'

@Toe - Toe-tally agree on let's get busy on some feet! Yay. Just look at Kelly! She's been patiently waiting while we tried to hash out all this nonsense!--->
Block user
2014-04-04 02:55:43Toe  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
This is my last chime. I, like BIB60 am out, mainly because I think that the bigger part of the problem is all the onlookers. Perhaps if it were just left to you and her, it could be resolved. I would encourage others to try the same. Let's get back to the business of doing business. Giving the business to these gorgeous feet here. They'll work it out on their own.

If I don't delete this in a couple of hours, deny it please. Thanks @Grik. I gotta get to work.
Block user
2014-04-04 02:52:13DeadlyPixxxie  (user)
@BiB60 - There's nothing to debate, hence why I'm not unblocking him. The end. I've got nothing to say to him.

Now TRLB1, he's getting unblocked post-haste. :)

Block user
2014-04-04 02:45:34BackInBlack60  (user)
@54 @Pixxie - I don't have any special 'in' with Eli; maybe you're thinking of @Mr>Hate? And you both have a "Contact Us" button, top left side of this screen. Y'all write him if it's bothering you that much.

@Pixxxie- Until (if) he ever gets banned, @Grik is a Guild member and as soon as he evaluates a couple dozen more comments, has just as much right to speak his mind in Guild Chat as any of the rest of us, and perhaps it would then serve its intended purpose... to keep OT 'discussions' off the walls. Again, I'm not pushing anything one way or another, was just responding to @Grik's post about why he at this time can only *read* Guild chat but not *respond* there quite yet. The only problem is, he claims his only real dispute out of all the members here is with one particular member who has blocked him and refuses to debate. And I'm certain both of you are master debaters and/or cunning linguists. And I'm tired of playing "the telephone game" with y'all.
Block user
2014-04-04 02:24:46DeadlyPixxxie  (user)
@BiB60 - Nope. Just don't care to see it. However, I vote against the guild chat idea...because...for the thousandth time (and I don't think you're listening, which is making me sad), this is a one...sided...issue.

Block user
2014-04-04 02:18:5754  (user)
What's Grik doing now, blowing smoke yet again? "Sorry" AGAIN? I believe Shanghai Red and Professor Chaos (and his 18 other accounts) are his only two fans. @BackInBlack60 Whatever email Deadly Pixxxie wanted you to send about Grik, at least keep it in a draft folder. You may have to send it after his latest "sorry" fades away.
Block user
2014-04-04 02:08:28Shanghai Red  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Your fine Comrade(Grik)......more members here love and adore what you bring to this site than most could imagine. Your posts being approved on a daily basis says it all for me.....you've done nothing wrong at all, just people here thinking they've been given some "power" now think they are "powerful".....so lame.
Block user
2014-04-04 02:06:53BackInBlack60  (user)
@Grik- What post of mine was rejected? I think I see them all on this wall? Don't really care, just curious. Suggest if you are up to 465 on Guild Experience that you go and get busy - you can get the other 35 you need in about 20 minutes, then you can Guild Chat your heart out, although the person to whom you refer won't see your posts there either, if I'm not mistaken (not sure about that). I'd strongly suggested that person ask to have you unblocked, because at this point all they can see is snippets of yours that others quote, but perhaps that's what the user hoped for and intended. Just sayin' - go evaluate some comments (69 available system-wide right now, minus your own) and then come debate your little heart out in Guild chat, where these discussions really belong.
Block user
2014-04-04 01:47:32Grik  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Seeing as I am not part of Guild Chat, this is the only forum I have to respond to the Coward's Castle.

I am not part of it, because (despite what some think) "You need to reach a guild exp. of 500 to participate in the chat.
(Review comments to gain exp)". I am only up to 465. I was not banned as some think.

@Toe and @ Angus and indeed the rest of you with one notable exception, you are all my friends as far as I am concerned. @ILuvfeet I forgive you.

The problem is one certain individual, who, despite admitting she has not read, or doesn't read my posts, ASSUMES they are temper tantrums, break the rules, up to old tricks, rude, never learns. etc etc

JO had the guts to back me. All the others seem afraid. Actually, the fact I wasn't part of the Guild Chat is the reason I vent feelings here. And, even that is held against me. (@Angus, as I'm typing this, I just noticed your post has been kebabed). By whom, I wonder? Someone with an agenda, I submit!

For the record, my issue is with one person, who I would love to debate, but she hides behind the Guild Chat throwing rockets in my direction.

Block user
50 wall posts left