Kranz (user)2015-10-11 16:21:52
Have you ever seen man nipples at the beach? Or at the YMCA swimming pool? Or perhaps jogging?
Men's nipples are allowed everywhere. They don't sexually stimulate anybody I know of outside of @Grik.
Man nipples, yes. YES, YES!!! OH, DEAR GOD, YES!!!!
Iluvfeet (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2015-10-11 16:25:45
Site Guidelines, "Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked."
marlowesque (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-10-11 17:36:54
That's all well and good but NONE of the pictures, which have all now been removed, were of an 'adult' nature. This was merely someone lounging on a beach, NOT someone in a sexually compromising position. Furthermore, there are literally 1000's of pictures here on wikifeet where a man's nipples can be seen, why is this allowed if a woman's nipples are not? Pictures of Kate's COVERED nipples NOT allowed but, Jamie's nipples, on page two, totally acceptable? What maddening duplicitous hypocrisy of the first order!
Iluvfeet (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2015-10-11 17:55:29
That's a societal or political agenda. On WF, the admin., site owner, sets the law. If you disagree, there's always the ^^^^ "Contact us" ^^^^ up top.
Kranz (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2015-10-11 18:31:27
@marlo- I hear ya, sir. However, @ILF is right. Admin makes these rules.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2015-10-24 04:10:11
"Sometimes pictures give the impression of adult content, even though they aren't. When a picture is cropped to show nothing but skin and give the impression that the girl is naked, or if there's a close-up on feet that give away a weird/porn-like pose, I tend to remove it. I try to look at galleries from the advertisers' point of view (as I depend on them to keep the site going, and they have zero tolerance for edgy content). If I enter a gallery and get the feeling I've entered an adult site, I start removing pictures until it looks SFW.
So I'm sorry, but I stand behind my decision to remove those pics. Also, please try to see things my way and avoid from uploading such pics in the future."
@marlowesque- Not *our* rules and admittedly 1950's standards. @Creator says it's driven by the picky advertisers who have no sense of humour and no tolerance for 'edgy' pics. Be advised that HERE, even sideboob or underboob = Adult Content (even if your four-year-old can see it on a magazine cover of any supermarket checkout in the world). I had a pic removed from Riley Reid's gallery because when receiving a poolside pedicure from a female friend, the friend's "thumb looks like a small penis." In fact, let me QUOTE the man from @Franciely's gallery: