Forgot to add... really sweet high arches too, especially for smaller feet. Not much I can find wrong with this photo----> I prefer the nails shorter (on feet, longer on hands) but these aren't long enough to be gross. Just don't let @Digby see them or he'll call 'em claws! Hey, I'd *love* to have these claws digging into me while... [drifts off into dreamy fantasy]
@BinB..point taken. Oftentimes I let sarcasm get the best of my better instincts...in the spirit of civility I will in the future endeavor to be a kinder, gentler member.
2014-03-14 19:32:33BackInBlack60 (user)
@warp - I dunno, man... they look pretty small by comparing to adjacent objects in many photos here. If that's standard 2x6 decking, they're downright tiny! I'll buy a 5 if she says so.
2014-03-14 18:33:07BackInBlack60 (user)
@warp - I get it, because as a former shoe salesmen, we salesmen sort of prided ourselves on being able to guess. You better believe the women themselves often err a half size on the short side...at least!
Really, I'm 'on your team' on wanting accurate sizes, but know that there are very few of us for whom this is important, other than in a vague, "too small, too large, just right" way (Three Bears as someone else said this morning re @Digby). My only point of contention with you at all is making that the 'sole' :) subject of your post without further comment and often in an insulting way that some consider 'disrespectful' re the new Eli rules. Also, have seen many, many, many private complaints about it among those working so hard to approve/reject comments, and some are as sick of the size posts as they are of 'Ready for Grik' and other too-oft repeated posts.
Re 'guessing' - when the size 'feeture' was new, I was careful to not ever guess (well POST my guess) if there was no credible documentation of it online anywhere. After a time, and especially after you came on board, I started doing some guessing on those where it was apparent no proof was available and more importantly on those where there had been obvious...'mischief' (VANDALISM) to the size field. If that's your thing, rock on, bro, except *please* in addition to posting a *nice* disagreement about the size, please also 'fix' it in the size (and some cases nationality) field as you find errors. Peace, bro. Do your thang.
@BackinBlack69; I'll take your lighthearted sarcasm as a backhanded complement. What can I say? Part of my fetish with women's feet has always been guessing shoe size and since joining the site recently, seeing so many size guesses not even close, I felt compelled to don the robes of shoe size judge. It's a thankless job, but as I see size as an important variable for feet, I felt compelled to refute the inaccuracies. (By the way, it's also been my experience with many of the sites listed that the size given is often wrong, and with women they usually err on the short side) As for Janet Mason (smiling) being somewhat familiar with her MILF porn status, while I can't see her as a 4 1/2-5, neither is she an 8 but a solid 7 as listed above. Until next time....au revoir.
2014-03-02 17:48:47BackInBlack60 (user)
@jerker69 - Ummm, cute size? She is listed several places as 4½-5 US. It shows "5" already at the top of this page, but I'm sure despite all this @warpedmind will be here in a minute to proclaim she's an 8, at least.