Welcome to wikiFeet.
Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
ToothpickTorture - 6493
(0.35% reported)
Visualizer - 2431
(1.03% reported)
a2it - 2345
(0.17% reported)
toejam1 - 1741
(0.80% reported)
Kawen Mr Jeyt - 1710
(0.35% reported)
disclaimer
privacy statement


Loading...

Hillary Rodham Clinton

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 7.5 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (410 total votes)
80
beautiful
63
nice
78
ok
50
bad
139
ugly

Rating:
 (ok feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨

more info22 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Hillary Rodham Clinton's feet, also liked:
Kylie Minogue
Rose Byrne
Melania Trump
Sophie Turner
Lari Venâncio
Got anymore Hillary Rodham Clinton Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the guild more info

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
Love Her Feet
Member since 02/2014
2016-11-18 07:50:47
I'd give her a foot massage. She at least deserves that much.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Elway
Member since 02/2014
K
2016-11-18 08:15:35
Yes after her humiliating defeat she deserves at least that.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-10-11 04:32:42
Allow me to rephrase the question. Did everyone enjoy the 2nd debate?
Grik
Member since 05/2012
E
2016-10-11 04:53:52
May I insert some non-USA input?

What Trump and Clinton have convinced me is that NEITHER of them is fit to serve as President of the USA.

They have done total ratchet jobs on each other

If I was a voter, I would go to the polling booth and stand there undecided

Luckily over there voting is not compulsory

I predict Trump will be assassinated if elected, and there will be tens of millions of suspects

And if Hillary gets elected, Bill will pull the strings

320,000,000 people to choose from and it gets down to Nutjob#1 & Nutjob#2

Only in America!

Gamoto!

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-11 06:51:05
Why would Bill pull the strings? It was Hillary really pulling all the strings when Bill had the job.
Spankynuts
Member since 09/2010
E
2016-10-11 09:02:10
Not sure if I agree with @BiB's assertion. Still, if she's half the president he was (no, I don't care how many interns he gave extra credit to), we're looking forward to a prosperous next four years. Hey, I don't like her personally, either, but if she keeps even a fourth of the promises she's made, we're in for a far smoother ride than we ever had with Dubya. And don't get me started on that insecure, narcissistic, egomaniacal man-baby, Donald J. Trump. Jesus Christ on a stick that man is the trashiest, most foolish, most infantile 70-year-old I have ever witnessed. He's so stupid, he makes Dubya look like Stephen Hawking by comparison. Damn...I DID say don't get me started on him....
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-10-12 00:24:11
Thank you, Spankynuts for your comments, I share your dismay. Too bad Hillary is a flawed candidate herself, it's making this whole thing much closer than it should be.

It's worth noting what Grik says. The opinion people in other countries have about America is not being helped by this fiasco of a campaign. Although, to be honest, there are many Americans (Trumpists? Libertarians?) that could care less about the USA's standing in the world.
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
alien feet
Member since 09/2015
D
2016-10-12 00:43:19
In the history of the U.S. Presidency most all were extremely flawed worse then Hillary including Kennedy Reagan Lbj Nixon etc.
A war broke out when Lincoln was elected.It was said that Ford was the only President that never commited adultery.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-12 00:59:36
@Spanky: 1) I guess you forgot Hillary's many "co-Presidency" and "Two for the price of one" speeches back in the day (which IMO disqualifies her from running at all under Amendment XXII (U.S. Constitution), and
2) Despite all your many assertions that your years among the media elite leftists didn't "coulour our world," the above rant seems to prove otherwise.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-12 01:32:06
>"It was said that Ford was the only President that never commited adultery." Jimmy Carter only lusted after them in his heart (but by 'Jesus Rules,' I guess that counts!)
Spankynuts
Member since 09/2010
E
2016-10-12 10:05:06
@BiB - Did I say that? My "years among the media elite didn't colour" my world? Not saying I didn't say that, but please cite your source. Also, I take zero responsibility for any rant I might have made while inebriated. As to Hillary's presidency - which she seems to be on the very cusp of winning - I cannot say with any degree of certainty what that will be like. I know that the U.S. was prosperous, powerful and fat during (Bill) Clinton's reign, and my greatest concern was how I was going to pay off my student loans. Thanks to Dubya and his warmongering - and the infernal USA PATRIOT Act (it's an acronym, btw) - The Fed decided it would by up my student loans and therefore screw me out of any hope for a tax return. Icing on the cake, the $40K+ degree I earned will catch me maybe $20K a year if I'm lucky. I shit you not.

Lastly, the above is *not* a rant. If you want to see some rants, check out my blog: www.mindrender.blogspot.com There you will find rants until your heart's content. And if your above post is anything to go by, you'll find much with which you disagree. Which makes it fun, of course. Drop a comment - feel free. Would love to hear from you outside of WF (and use "WF" somewhere in your post so I know it's you, haha). I'd be glad to discuss it all with you more in-depth. God knows I'm capable....ugh. Nothing I'm proud of, believe me.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-14 06:55:37
I'll just rebut by saying that THE most prosperous period in US History since the post-WW2 fifties was the filthy rich 80s with two terms of Ronnie Reagan. Any fool could simply fall down and land in a pile of cash in the 80s.
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-10-14 09:20:37
The 80s sure look like they were a fun time. Movies like Back to the Future and Ghostbusters, hair metal... I'd love to have a time machine.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-10-14 19:03:50
Oh, @BinB, you Ronnie lovin' son of a gun. Taxes went up (when he promised they wouldn't), and his spending spree on the military created a significant deficit that wasn't eliminated until B. Clinton came around after Bush Sr. Please provide some evidence that the Reagan years were profitable for the rest of us, not just you.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-19 23:51:14
Wow, all these inaccurate assumptions! You cannot pigeon-hole me from a soundbite, if you ever can at all.

I don't love him or any of them. Didn't even like him as an actor (same thing as politician), but he was amusing. However I had plenty of money & no debt, and that was true of most everyone I knew then... and no, I wasn't a 'wealthy white guy' like Ronnie or Bush or Trump or Clinton (either one of 'em! LOL). It surely beat 22% inflation/interest rates under lust-in-his-heart Jimmy Carter.

By 'deficit eliminated' I assume you mean bookkeeping tricks to make it appear the annual GFY budget was 'eliminated' by piling it onto the national debt (well, yes, and cutting a lot of Ronnie's defense budget because the Evil Empire was allegedly 'disbanded,' but that's a whole other topic) which is now doubling like every decade (not gonna look up charts & stats) no matter who is in charge of it.

I've been all over the map from one extreme to the other and everywhere in between politically, but now since I took the Red Pill and can see The Matrix, I simply refuse to play a rigged game & haven't voted since about the mid-90s. So, as Carlin said, "Don't blame me! I didn't vote these idiots in, YOU did!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

I used to be apathetic, but now I just don't care and I'm... how did you put it? "....Libertarian? that could care less about the USA's standing in the world."

Although you mean *couldn't* care less, in fact I do care about the USA's "standing" in the world (squatting? lying down? or "Help, I've fallen & I can't get up!") I'm just too cynical & fatalistic to dare to dream "Yes We Can!" or even at this point that we're "Stronger Together" or can "Make America Great Again," and that we haven't long ago passed "The Point of Know Return." Like every other civilization in history, we've had a rise, plateau, and an inevitable Decline and Fall. We are Rome (under Caligula? Nero? Domitian?) and our fate will be no different from theirs.

Maybe "I'm Just Wild About Harry!" or "I Still Like Ike!" (:^p)

Suggested watching:
"Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media" (1992)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHa6NflkW3Y
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-10-21 07:22:56
oookay.
furious
Member since 09/2012
E
2016-10-21 08:03:44
Got bored after the second post. Just vote for Alfred E Newman.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
Smoothsole
Member since 11/2013
2016-10-21 11:30:15
I thought there might be a thread like this here! A lot of people seem to be despairing about the quality of candidates this time around (more so than usual).This campaign seems to have turned into "Who is the most rapey...Trump or Bill?"

They're actually the perfect candidates, if you think about it. Regardless of who gets in, it's the same people behind the scenes advising them. The same bankers and fat cats shaping economic policy. The same warmongers and geopolitical strategists setting foreign policy etc etc. There's more than enough dirt on the pair of them for them to be quickly forced into line and do as they're told. The system works!!.....And good luck with changing that! I think Hillary will look almost human when she smiles and Trump will have a good hair day before that ever happens!! HaHa : )

It's not like we fare any better here in Britain : ( We've had two Prime Minister's (Gordon Brown and Theresa May) in the last decade who nobody even voted for! We also had Tony Bliar...nuff said, and David Camoron and he shagged a dead pig! : / Squeeeee, indeed ...but I digress....

@Grik- How many times has the Australian government changed in the last few years because of scandal/ineptitude?!? ; p

Agree with Angus about giving Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent", "How the World Works" and "Because we say so" a watch/read, regardless of where you sit on the Political spectrum (if you sit at all) John Pilger is another author worth checking out. I've read several of his and "Freedom Next Time" and "Hidden Agendas" are extremely well written, thought provoking reads.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-21 14:33:49
>"Regardless of who gets in, it's the same people behind the scenes advising them."
Thanks, Smoothie!
That, in one succinct sentence, is exactly the point I was trying to make!
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-21 14:34:51
@furious>"Just vote for Alfred E Newman."

What, me worry???
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-12 16:54:33
@below the ankle> "Please provide some evidence that the Reagan years were profitable for the rest of us, not just you."

Well, here's a quotation from an ultra-liberal Democratic friend of mine, a former Black Panther and current supporter of Obama and both Clintons:

"I began to feel a new sense of confidence and vigor and thought, "maybe this will work out of my benefit?" We all know how Republicans look out for their business owners and I am about to start two more to go with the one I already operate. Maybe the 80's are coming again?!?!? (Remember all that money we had? You could work a minimum wage job and still live like the big dogs back then)."

I don't know how old you are, BTA, but both this guy and I, from very different backgrounds, were young working men in our mid-20s then, really just getting started in business and career. We lived it, and we both remember having a ton of money and no worries. I was in finance and real estate at the time... banking/stock & bond trading for a job, and real estate investing/sales on my own. Life was good for a kid in his 20s; I bought my first house at 21 and had a nice new Honda Prelude (and a hot young wife).

But then, recreational drugs were also plentiful and cheap, so maybe our memories of that era were clouded! (:^p)
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-11-13 16:22:47
My snarky, yet pithy replies keep disappearing when I hit "submit". Hmmmm..... well, the person I was responding to probably saw them. But just in case......Forbes Magazine writer Craig Silver has an appropriate article from about 5 years ago. "Mourning in America". Worth a read.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Elway
Member since 02/2014
K
2016-11-13 16:32:48
@bta, thanks for the suggestion. It is a good article.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/craigsilver/2011/06/30/many-recall-life-under-ronald-reagan-as-mourning-in-america/#3cb5d3c558c2
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-13 16:47:55
@bta- Thanks. I'm always open-minded-- some say so much that my brain falls out! Sorry if I missed your replies (feel free to PM me). Lotta complaints about a couple threads on this page including this one. "They want it deleted."

I read the article. All I know was I was an average young guy with little education who did really well at the time. Maybe that had more to do with the local economy (even now, Texas doesn't know there has been a recession).

What I see in that article is some true stuff that was continued ever since by Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama. Maybe they're all as crooked as Dick Nixon.
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
BitchySexy
Member since 12/2014
2016-07-05 05:40:51
I worship and adore Goddess Hillary Rodham Clinton, Madam President and Most Powerful Woman On Earth
User rated ★(ugly feet)
reesie87
Member since 10/2010
K
2016-07-05 05:48:46
OMG!!!!! I just threw up a little in my mouth
toekisser
Member since 09/2012
E
2016-07-05 05:53:00
@bs--I sure hope you're kidding
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-07-05 06:27:32
Gag me with spoon.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kranz
Member since 05/2013
K
2016-07-05 07:33:39
With all due respect..... there are plenty of people I hate that I wouldn't mind shagging. (:^D)
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-07-05 07:43:05
Even Bill doesn't like it.
joker777
Member since 01/2016
E
2016-07-05 10:37:40
I bow, trump gave her an easy peesy win.
joker777
Member since 01/2016
E
2016-07-26 03:24:57
Can I delete my easy peesy comment!?
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kranz
Member since 05/2013
K
2016-07-26 03:39:52
No, @Joker, you may not. You're given strict orders to score an eighter of dank nugs. Then, you must drink an eight pack of Budweiser. Only then will you be forgiven for being an admirer of the most bottom part of the female anatomy.
joker777
Member since 01/2016
E
2016-07-26 03:42:02
I'll drink 2 that! (:^P)
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kranz
Member since 05/2013
K
2016-07-26 04:28:51
You better! (:^D)
Overlord
Member since 08/2016
2016-11-11 11:46:55
Joker, just thought I'd say you're WRONG.
Matthew McConaughey
Member since 06/2016
E
2016-11-09 10:24:22
U LOSE
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-11-09 10:31:03
#LockHerUp
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 14:06:11
#HillaryForPrison
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kane McAdam
Member since 11/2014
D
2016-11-09 14:09:51
you guys do know how the justice system works, don't you?
courts are judges decide if someone guilty or not, not the president.
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-11-09 14:18:32
The Obama Administration ordered the FBI to stop the Clinton investigation. Corrupt.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 14:28:14
@Kane McAdam>"you guys do know how the justice system works, don't you?"

Yes, yes I do... but apparently you don't. Actually juries of 'peers' (other citizens) decide guilt or innocence, unless a jury trial is waved by the accused, or at Supreme Court level, in which cases the matter is decided solely by judges. (Side note: Jurors are under *no* obligation to 'follow the law' or the 'instructions to the jury' and can, for moral or other reasons, decide a matter in any way they choose; they are totally soverign in that case. Look up "jury nullification")

However, the President can "decide innocence" by granting a pardon, and it won't surprise me if Lame Duck Obama does just that with Hillary and her corrupt crew. Go look at the hundred or so pardons her husband handed out just before he left office. It also worked out nicely for Nixon to resign and then his successor, Ford, to pardon him. As Idiot said... "Corrupt."
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-11-09 14:33:27
I read that Virginia governor McAuliffe gave voting rights to 60,000 convicted felons shortly before the election. Not enough to sway the election on their own, but still pretty stupid. I'm a Bob McDonnell guy.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kane McAdam
Member since 11/2014
D
2016-11-09 14:36:03
I don't know about the States but in Canada you have the OPTION of Jury trail if you're accused with a crime punishable by 5 years of imprisonment or more; you can't have a Jury trail if it's less than 5 years.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 15:36:38
@Kane- Varies by state here. Some states it's similar to yours, in some states it's any crime. For example, it's possible to get out of a traffic ticket in some states (like Oklahoma) by demanding a jury trial; which gets put off forever, etc. and with a little luck, ticketing officer doesn't show up that day... case dismissed.
DantéInExile
Member since 10/2014
E
2016-11-09 16:20:28
Is this WikiFeet or WikiPolitics? @BIB, you are an Admin. You should know better than to carry on this kind of silliness in here. We have Reddit, Disqus, Twitter and any number of other places. And for the record, what you don't know about the states? Did you really claim ignorance on being an American while suggesting a political opponent should be locked up? That's kind of 3rd World buddy. Since you don't know your own country, let me enlighten you. The US Constitution ('member that?) guarantees all accused, the right to a trial by jury at their request. It's right up there in the beginning.

Now please delete this and clean all the rest of this crap up. You got your little star to do a job. #sad
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 16:35:46
Yow, sorry. Let me amend that hashtag:
#HillaryForInvestigation
#HillaryForIndictmentByGrandJury
#HillaryForChargesOfCrimes
#HillaryOnTrial

Better? Done toldja... she and Bill been rotten to the core for decades, and have managed to evade justice... so far. But sure, I'll go with "Innocent until proven guilty." Just think it's high time someone start doing some proving and meting out some consequences.

I'm just a moderator. That in no way encroaches on my right to have, and to express, an opinion. And, the Moderators have already determined they will not serve as censors here just because of something they don't agree with and happen to have a 'reject' button... same as the Guild rules state:

o You must not reject a comment just because you don't agree with it. People are allowed to voice their opinions as long as they are respectful.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 16:44:04
Amendment VI
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

"The right to trial by jury in a criminal case resides in both Article III, Section 2 of the federal Constitution (“The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury”) and the Sixth Amendment. But the right isn’t as broad as those texts might suggest, meaning that many defendants have to settle for judge trials, where the court decides whether the defendant is guilty."

The 'rub' is that some states don't consider traffic tickets and misdemeanors as 'Crimes' and the Supreme Court (SCOTUS... the Judiciary Branch... remember them?) has upheld that repeatedly:

"According to the Supreme Court, the jury-trial right applies only when “serious” offenses are at hand—petty offenses don’t invoke it. For purposes of this right, a serious offense is one that carries a potential sentence of more than six months’ imprisonment. (Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).) If the penalty is six months or less, the crime is serious only if the sum of its penalties are weighty enough. The Supreme Court decided in one case that up to six months’ incarceration or five years’ probation, plus a $5,000 maximum fine weren’t enough to make a certain kind of DUI a serious offense. (U.S. v. Nachtigal, 507 U.S. 1 (1993).) Likewise, in another case, it decided that a first-time DUI was merely a petty offense where:

o the maximum imprisonment was six months
o there was an alternative penalty of 48 hours’ community service while wearing DUI-offender identification
o there was a maximum fine of $1,000
o defendants had to undergo alcohol-abuse education, and
defendants automatically lost their licenses for 90 days.
(Blanton v. City of N. Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989).)"
User rated ★(ugly feet)
tbager
Member since 10/2010
D
2016-11-09 16:59:13
Orange is the new black.
Smoothsole
Member since 11/2013
2016-11-09 17:19:28
I've got to admit that I find it amusing that the left wing establishment are crying about the result like all that's good in the world has been lost and she offered a chance for something better. She's a hideous human being and represents all that's wrong with the political establishment but, Trump is not the answer. Feeding peoples fears, anger and hatred with more fear, anger and hatred is toxic and nothing good will come from it. I'm not sure if I hope the next 4 years will teach people that or not : /
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kane McAdam
Member since 11/2014
D
2016-11-09 17:30:52
@BiB really! a Jury trail for a Traffic ticket, you have enough money to cover that but not for free health care!
@Danté I'm from Québec, Dude!, I haven't studied American law.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 18:12:22
>"Now please delete this and clean all the rest of this crap up."

I've had a public and private request to delete this entire thread, and asked if I've lost my mind. Thoughts on that? (The first part, I mean; second part is a foregone conclusion...)

Do you consider any or all of it: "Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit" or "not classy?"
Or even so far off-topic it doesn't belong here, as suggested?
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 18:15:10
Side note: "What @Smoothie said." All of it.
davetrimble
Member since 02/2012
E
2016-11-09 19:33:10
I find this to be extremely sexually explicit
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
alien feet
Member since 09/2015
D
2016-11-09 19:52:41
Almost hideous as child rapist.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 20:08:13
Gee, guys, thanks a lot for your... "thoughtful" opinions. I'm serious...
Is there a good reason to delete this thread? I don't want to be a "censor," nor even accused of such, just because somebody said something unpopular.
Is it 'hateful,' 'unclassy' or wildly off-topic enough to remove?
Some people actually post ratings here based in part on their perception of a woman's character (including one who asked me to delete this post), as pointed out in this article:

http://www.vice.com/en_us/read/hillary-clinton-wikifeet-foot-fetish-virgil-texas
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
alien feet
Member since 09/2015
D
2016-11-09 20:11:12
@BiB It is indeed hateful.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-11-09 21:20:13
@BIB It won't bother me a bit if you decide to delete my comment,I don't consider wanting someone to be held accountable for their crimes "hateful" at all.
pidgeon66
Member since 05/2013
E
2016-11-09 22:27:12
Don't mind me. Just posting vindictive comments against a political candidate who lost to a reality TV star on her celebrity foot fetish gallery page. 2016
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
alien feet
Member since 09/2015
D
2016-11-09 22:45:44
We all lost
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-10 01:34:16
@P66>"a political candidate who lost to a reality TV star"

Do people not know who and what Donald Trump was decades before he said, "You're FIRED!" on TV??? Do they not know he owned half of New York City and other real estate holdings including a luxury casino/hotel? That's about like referring to Hillary Clinton as a "wife of former Arkansas governor and mother of one child." While true, she's come a long way, baby!

As I told someone in PM when they asked me what I thought of the election:

The media portrayal of Donald Trump as a 'Reality TV Star' is a little disingenuous. He's a very intelligent and shrewd real estate investor/mogul who oversees an empire of profitable business ventures. His 'reality show' was merely an outgrowth of what he already had been for decades, not the other way around (like Paris Hilton, Kardashians, and so many others who are merely famous for being famous). He's a lot of things... arrogant, pompous, but certainly not a dummy, and part of what just put him in office is the fact that Americans are sick to death of the 'insiders' supposedly on the right and left, but really all controlled by the same forces and people, all sold out to the system. Trump has absolutely no political background, but solid skills with running a large business and dealing with people, yet is an 'outsider' and 'maverick' who (we hope) is wealthy enough in his own right that he hopefully won't be able to be 'bought' by special interests.

It actually angered me that they were calling Trump a 'reality TV star' and saying nothing like this had ever happened before. REALLY? HELLO? Ronald Reagan's only claim to fame was as an actor, then President of Screen Actors Guild, then Governor of California, then President of the US. Schwarzenegger, same deal... bodybuilder turned movie star, turned 'Governator' of 'Collie-FOR-nee-uh' and might be President now if he were natural born US Citizen (or claimed to be born in Hawaii). AT LEAST Trump has been highly successful running a large business enterprise and has the sense to surround himself with people who have expertise in areas where he doesn't.

In any case, the next four years will be an interesting ride (as if the last 20-30 years here haven't been!)
pidgeon66
Member since 05/2013
E
2016-11-10 08:15:55
You really think anyone would have paid attention to him if he wasn't a TV celebrity? This is the state of things. People haven't learned how to deal with the new celebrity and social media yet (hopefully eventually they will, or 2024's going to look like idiocracy). That's really all I wanted to say on the subject, but if you're going to call that disingenuous:

Praising his business background, if anything, is FAR more disingenuous. The guy inherited the business and millions of dollars from his father...then fell into 6 bankruptcies and multiple failed businesses anyway. And that's even DESPITE him cheating the tax system to save billions, DESPITE him hiring illegals for cheap, DESPITE him refusing to pay people who worked for him under contract, DESPITE him buying Chinese steel, DESPITE the welfare-for-the-wealthy our government operates upon, DESPITE him and his business practices being a major contributor 2008 recession and flight of jobs from our shores (no, no, it's obamacare! it's muslims! it's illegals!). But hey, sometimes people have to put all their faith into someone who they need to save them.

Hopefully the last I'll write about this on Hillary's wikifeet gallery.
pidgeon66
Member since 05/2013
E
2016-11-10 08:29:41
Heck, if we all got as many free passes as Trump, politicians, and the rest of the 1%, I'm sure we'd all be doing way better. But I don't see that changing in 4 or 8 years, especially under someone who only made it where he is now by exploiting those free passes.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-10 12:34:17
@P66- Yeah, I didn't get into all that, but you are largely correct. I said somewhere (on this page) "That's not to say Trump doesn't have a closet full of skeletons also..."

So, you just jerked him out of the closet! ;)

I've also wondered if he has any chance at all of a second term, but then, I was certain Nixon, Bush Sr., Clinton, Shrub (Bush Jr.), and Obama didn't either, and look what happened. (Well, we didn't have Dick Nixon to kick around very long in his second term, but that's his own fault!)

I also agree whole-heartedly with your last statement:
"But hey, sometimes people have to put all their faith into someone who they need to save them."
At this point in time, I think it's foolhardy to put our faith in any single human bean to 'save us.' America maybe past the point of no return now. M.A.G.A.? Doubt it.

Say... Do you know where I can obtain one of those "One-percenter Free Passes?" ;)
User rated ★(ugly feet)
Ranma
Member since 06/2016
2016-11-10 20:31:29
BIB said « the Moderators have already determined they will not serve as censors here just because of something they don't agree with »

Oh really ??
The reality seems to be different though.
There's censorship on this site, especially when people post comment about how upset they felt as they stumbled upon transgender individuals galleries on Wikifeet...

However, political debates seem to be allowed on a celebrity feet oriented website.
That makes a whole lotta sense...
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-10 20:41:45
@Ranma- That was the doing of the GUILD, not the Moderators. The Moderators weren't even here until a week or two ago. If any 'censorship' was or is done, it's because the Guild rejected a comment. Maybe since you are not a Guild member, you don't understand the distinction between the two.

The Guild is made up of many members (you are free to join and participate), and as of February 2014, they review pending comments only visible to Guild members and 'vote' on them (Accept/Reject) before they are posted publicly for the world to see.

This member self-moderation was the only type we had until a few days ago. Only the Owner/Admin himself could remove approved comments, ban users, etc. Now we have three others who can do that, but those three have decided not to overrule the Guild's decision about comments except in the most extreme cases (very rare) when something 'horrible' (gross, sexually explicit, etc.) was approved that shouldn't have been.

Feel free to hit the "Guild" button, upper left of page, and join. You can participate as much or as little as you like, and quit or rejoin at any time.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-10 22:12:57
@Ranma>"There's censorship on this site, especially when people post comment about how upset they felt as they stumbled upon transgender individuals galleries on Wikifeet..."

I'm not even aware of that, unless it was "Hate Speech" against them or other users. Many people here aren't happy about the 100 Transgender galleries, but LOTS of guys have made all manner of snarky and even nasty comments about them which are routinely approved... go look at the comments on Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner's wall! Further, in many of those galleries I've posted a list of them so people can avoid them if they want.

Most of all though... the Owner of this site says they're welcome here and he refuses to 'flag' or identify them in any way as TG galleries... so what are we to do? All we can do is give you this list...

https://www.reddit.com/r/WIkifeetChat/comments/4fe19l/2_the_transexual_mf_galleries_at_wikifeet_list/
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-11-09 10:22:18
#DefeatedFeet
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-11-08 23:48:12
Looks like you can never underestimate the intelligence of American voters. Bubba showed up.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-09 00:29:11
Who is Bubba? That was many people's nickname for her husband when he was in office.
GrassHopperWrestlng
Member since 02/2012
E
2016-11-08 20:54:26
Vice wrote an entire article about Hillary Clinton's WikiFeet comments, haha!

http://www.vice.com/en_us/read/hillary-clinton-wikifeet-foot-fetish-virgil-texas
Radosław35
Member since 04/2016
E
2016-11-08 21:10:49
I think I let it go with the policy. Let's wait until tomorrow, your choice.
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
abercrombieandfeet
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-10-28 18:24:53

The FBI have reopened the case after new emails found ...... God those feets will look great in prison shower slides!
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-10-28 18:25:49
Here's hoping she loses the election.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-11-07 09:18:26
Check yourself, the FBI has reopened nothing. Sure to piss off the Trumpies, but c'mon, if the only way Donald can win is because Hillary is so awful, that says absolutely nothing about his own abilities to govern a country.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-07 11:16:26
Yep, just announced this morning... she threatened or bribed someone into dropping the whole affair. Say what you will, she comes to the election with tons and long tons and metric tons of baggage full of dirty laundry going back to the Dixie Mafia years in Arkansas. I could fill this page with it, starting with Whitewater and Mena or before and going forward until this week. And I personally "knew people who knew stuff" and were eyewitnesses in Arkansas.

That's not to say Trump doesn't have a closet full of skeletons himself though!
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-11-07 11:24:30
I'm not voting Trump to spite Clinton. No, I'm voting Trump because I love Donald Trump. Also because Obamacare needs to be repealed ASAP, and only a Republican president can do that.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-07 11:32:48
Actually Hillary & Bill have come out very strongly against Obamacare and want it to fail, but it's with a hidden agenda of wanting to replace it with a massive single-payor government controlled healthcare behemoth that controls everything in the industry... the one she tried to push through when she and Bill were 'co-President.'

"If at first you don't succeed..."
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-11-07 11:37:44
She's good buddies with Obama. I don't see her trying to repeal it even if she did manage to win the election.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-11-07 11:40:50
One of her hacked e-mails said she wanted it to fail. She may not 'repeal' it unless it's to scrap it and start over, or she may just get it 'amended' to her true agenda.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-10-21 07:31:27
A photo from the days before Bill corrupted her. Or was it the other way around?
Should I even bother asking how everyone enjoyed the 3rd debate? Donald held it together a bit longer this time, but 90 minutes is asking a bit much of his attention span.
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
Lucic17xReborn
Member since 09/2016
R
2016-10-19 18:23:59
I disagree with 99% of what she says and she's a devil of a human being however, for a 68 year old woman her feet look better than average. From the small sample size we have of course. Bit harsh the rating in my opinion.
aldorann
Member since 02/2015
E
2016-10-19 20:03:21
I agree, but I can't bring myself to give her a good rating in any aspect of life.
SlimJim
Member since 10/2011
D
2016-10-19 19:55:07
See you next Tuesday.
sirbravosierra
Member since 11/2015
E
2016-09-27 10:40:31
So what did ya'll think of the debate? Trump in the lead according to the polls
User rated ★(ugly feet)
catsman11
Member since 05/2011
D
2016-09-27 10:53:22
I'm not a huge Trump fan, but I'd vote for any wet noodle before allowing this
pathological liar anywhere near the White House again.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-09-29 03:56:45
Hillary obfuscates, diminishes and evades the truth. But no one, NO ONE, outright lies like the Trumpmeister. He subscribes to the theory that if you repeat a lie over and over and over.....and over, that it assumes a veneer of truth. The truly sad part is that people buy into his schtick.
moebius
Member since 02/2014
D
2016-09-29 04:32:29
Trump: "I don't repeat myself! I don't repeat myself!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2amEsayvKU
User rated ★(ugly feet)
GEMINISTALLION74
Member since 03/2013
D
2016-09-29 04:47:42
HILLARY CAN'T TELL THE TRUTH: SHE HAS LIED SO LONG' TO SO MANY, ABOUT SO MUCH, SHE TRULY DOESN'T KNOW WHEN SHE'S CONTRADICTING HERSELF. BEGINNING WITH THE ORIGIN OF HER NAME AND EVERYTHING FORWARD.
ON TOP OF THAT SHE HERSELF SAYS SHE'S MOST QUALIFIED BECAUSE SHE'S BEEN IN WASHINGTON FOR OVER 35 YEARS IF THAT'S TRUE THEN FOLKS I THINK WE FOUND PATIENT ZERO.

ON THE OTHER HAND LIKE HIM OR NOT TRUMP HAS NEVER HELD ANY OFFICE AND I FOR ONE AM READY FOR A CHANGE. A NON INSIDER. OWES NOBODY NUTTIN

TO MY WIKI FAMILY PLEASE VOTE: IT IS TO IMPORTANT NOT TO. BLOOD HAS BEEN SPILLED FOR THIS RIGHT THEY SAY IT'S FREE BUT IN FACT THIS RIGHT COST'S US PLENTY. IT'S NOT FREE IT HAS SIMPLY BEEN PAID FOR BY FOLKS THAT CARE ABOUT OUR COUNTRY AND WATCH OVER YOU DAILY.

IF YOUR TRULY ON THE FENCE AND DON'T WANT TO GIVE EITHER YOUR SUPPORT THEN I ASK YOU TO PLEASE VOTE FOR SOMEONE THAT IS WORTH YOUR CONCERN. MY YOUNGEST. HE IS SERVING NOW AS WE ALL DO IN WHAT EVER WAY WE CAN, AND A VOTE FOR TRUMP IS A VOTE FOR OUR SERVICEMEN. OR TELL ME HOW TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION.

DADDY IS IT TRUE EVEN THOUGH I CANT GET SUPPLIES TO TRAIN PROPERLY. MY PRESIDENT JUST RELEASED 50 BILLION DOLLARS TO MY ENEMIES?
YES SON HE DID.
DADDY WHY WOULD HE DO THAT?
CHILD OF MINE I DO NOT KNOW............ TELL ME HILLARY WHY!!!!
aldorann
Member since 02/2015
E
2016-09-29 07:05:48
I'm with you Gemini. I wish there was another viable candidate besides Trump, but I cannot even entertain the notion of voting for Killary.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-09-29 19:54:43
If you vote for Trump, be careful what you ask for. He's motivated by people paying attention to him and making money. There is no evidence that he has anyone's best interests in mind except his own. "a vote for Trump is a vote for our servicemen [and women too]" I respectfully disagree. Please remember what he said to the vet who gave him his Purple Star: "Always wanted one of those, didn't think it would be this easy!" How ignorant is that? Yeah, he's got your son's back, GEMINI. Without any political experience, all we have are the words that tumble out of his mouth.
Spankynuts
Member since 09/2010
E
2016-10-12 10:16:19
I'm with most people when I say, neither of them are ideal, neither are very trustworthy, and both of them have special (i.e., corporate) interest groups in mind when they make their decisions. So that leaves me, as someone who trusts corporate leadership even less than I trust government leadership, with the decision of who has corporate - i.e., 100% profit-oriented - interests in mind when making decisions that will affect the U.S. And I think that answer is plain, voiced by his own rhetoric. He is blatant and unapologetic about cutting taxes on the wealthy - down to 15% - whereas Clinton has said she will raise taxes on the top 1%.

Now let's look at that. Because 99.99% of right wing pundits and politicians will tell you that, "Hey, if you raise their taxes, what's to keep them from sending all their jobs overseas?" That, my friends, is a VERY simple question. If they send their jobs overseas, the U.S. can place a trade embargo on *any* company which threatens to do just that. What that means for them is that they have lost the U.S. consumer, who is indisputably the largest and wealthiest consumer in the world. We buy up more foreign goods in a day than most countries do in a year. There are few, if any, corporations in the world who would be where they are today without the American consumer. So, you move all your jobs overseas, we ban you from trading in the U.S. Simple as that. So enough with that tired, old - they'll send our jobs overseas - argument, please?
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-12 16:56:27
@bta>"Hillary obfuscates, diminishes and evades the truth."

You left out that she is full of duplicity, mendacity, misrepresentation & prevarication, and that she fibs, fabricates, deceives, invents, fictionalizes, falsifies, exaggerates, perjures, invents, tells half-truths, tall tales and whoppers.

I remember they said of her husband, "If Bill ever told the truth, he'd have to tell a lie to cover it up."
GrassHopperWrestlng
Member since 02/2012
E
2016-10-12 19:19:59
None of this has to do with her feet though, which is what the comment field is actually supposed to be about. Just saying.
BooBoo
Member since 02/2011
R
2016-10-12 20:53:09
Breaking News: "Let's see some comments from Hillary's WikiFeet page about the debate..." :-)
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-14 06:47:17
@GrassHopper- We've been through all this before. If you carefully read above, it says NOTHING about feet. It merely says, "The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics."

Hillary's amoral or immoral disposition is asymmetrical, and both her overall looks and politics are not aesthetically pleasing.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
T10
Member since 12/2013
E
2016-08-31 03:32:30
God help us if she wins with these ugly feet..!! Trump 2016..!!!
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
alien feet
Member since 09/2015
D
2016-08-31 03:42:27
They will be the Presidential feet.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Kranz
Member since 05/2013
K
2016-08-31 04:20:22
This illuminati meat puppet is only a mere symptom of the troubles that lie ahead. For example, Cern (666) is trying very hard to open a portal to hell. I wish this was a bad joke, but unfortunately it's true. Don't take my word for it. Do your own research.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
tbager
Member since 10/2010
D
2016-10-12 21:15:41
Will be viewed in prison only.
idiot756
Member since 05/2010
D
2016-10-12 21:20:20
Hillary will not be President.
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
TheGoodFootCritic
Member since 06/2010
2016-10-13 15:26:29
This is a website for foot aesthetics not politics, but I have to say this - @idiot756 there is no realistic way to spin the electoral college where trump comes out on top. Hillary will get her 270 votes and then some. Every poll from the past three weeks confirms this.
kipbone
Member since 08/2011
E
2016-10-12 10:53:01
Does anyone remember -foot critic-? This spankynuts character starting to remind me of him, the way he or she carry's on.
kipbone
Member since 08/2011
E
2016-10-12 00:33:58
Shouldn't we be commenting on things about ladies feet and not real world problems.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-10-12 01:00:52
No. Look up: "The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics."

Looks like perfectly intellectual discussions to me... over symmetry, and other things. Even aesthetics.
Spankynuts
Member since 09/2010
E
2016-10-12 10:17:52
^^^^hahaha, love ya, Black.
Grik
Member since 05/2012
E
2016-09-27 13:22:56
America has 320,000,000 people to pick from and you end up having to choose between these 2 lamebrains. God HELP America!!
User rated ★(ugly feet)
tbager
Member since 10/2010
D
2016-09-27 14:47:11
She lost last night,and definitely loses here,pppeeewwww!
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-09-29 03:44:21
Hey, #tbager: she lost? Check yourself dude. And stop choking. As for #Grik: I hear you man. A choice between lame and lamer. With her we get the same old cronyism, shady, secretive dealings we've had since when. With him we get to watch a man line his pockets with the advantage that presidency will afford his business interests (i.e. Russia and South Korea). Maybe I can move to Oz. Hey Grik, what are the immigration laws like in Australia?
aldorann
Member since 02/2015
E
2016-09-29 07:03:54
Well she didn't win. I called it a draw. And based on expectations if you HAD to cleare a winner or loser a slight edge goes to Trump. IMO
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
Reported: No Feet Showing
2016-07-29 23:32:22
"What me lie?"
User rated ★(ugly feet)
GEMINISTALLION74
Member since 03/2013
D
2016-07-29 23:56:43
WARNING TO THE WORLD NO ONE IN HER OWN PARTY - COUNTRY - GENDER HEAVEN OR HELL TRUSTS HER YOU SHOULD'NT EITHER
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-07-30 00:28:53
REAL TALK
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-07-30 00:34:35
WAKE UP SHILLS AND SHEEP! OPEN YOUR EYES!!
User rated ★(ugly feet)
Mr Hate
Member since 05/2010
A
2016-07-30 00:37:09
I agree GS74. Say goodbye to the 2nd Amendment.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
GEMINISTALLION74
Member since 03/2013
D
2016-07-30 00:45:35
WAS PRETTY SURE THAT TRUMP WOULD WIN IN A LANDSLIDE: AMAZING HOW ALL THESE STATES ARE SUDDENLY DOING AWAY WITH VOTER ID AT THE POLLS AND SAME DAY REGISTRATION IS BEING OKAYED ( ILLEAGAL ALIENS OR UNDOCUMENTED DEMOCRATIC VOTERS YOU DECIDE )
SlimJim
Member since 10/2011
D
2016-07-30 00:56:13
I can't recommend the writing of Scott Adams enough. So much so that I won't even suggest you google his blog. Well worth the read:

http://blog.dilbert.com
User rated ★(ugly feet)
GEMINISTALLION74
Member since 03/2013
D
2016-07-30 01:05:38
@SJ: AM FAMILIAR
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-07-30 14:49:27
Wow, lots of white man fear/insecurity in this thread. Emotions that Donald exploits beautifully, but to no constructive end. Hillary is a seriously flawed candidate, but Donald makes her look like freakin' Mary Poppins.

The reason a few states have had their restrictive voting laws struck down is because....wait for it.... they're unconstitutional. Simple as that. And anyone who thinks that responsible gun control (i.e. preventing people on watch lists or whom the fbi has investigated own guns) is equal to repealing the second amendment is just drinking the NRA kool-aid. People have been saying Obama will take our guns since he was elected....yeah right, just not the way it works in the good 'ol USA.
aldorann
Member since 02/2015
E
2016-08-03 13:56:42
It's too bad that she's on record saying that the Heller decision is wrong and that she wants to repeal the second amendment. Since she will need to appoint justices to the Supreme Court, her ability to get rid of the second amendment is a more real threat than ever. And if you have to present an ID to do EVERYTHING else in this country requiring that voters present one seems like a no brainer.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-08-04 15:11:12
Looking back, the Heller decision seems rather quaint. Who today would question the constitutionality of self defense in the home? It was a 5-4 decision, hardly without controversy. I'm sorry, but when did Hillary call for a repeal of the 2nd amendment? I must have missed that. Big difference between opposing Heller and repealing an amendment in my mind.
All states have a method for identifying voters at the poll. The laws being struck down are the ones restricting the types of acceptable identification that may be used. Even a simple signature works to prevent the kind of fraud that these restrictive laws purport to address: voting more than once. Everyone eligible to vote can sign some form of thier name, but not all eligible voters have the form of ID now required in some states. Voter ID laws are designed to do one thing: supress the total number of votes cast.
aldorann
Member since 02/2015
E
2016-08-04 20:50:07
She's been careful to not come right out and say that she wants to abolish 2A, but one of her surrogates was caught on tape saying thus. But she is in favor of such onerous restrictions, even more stringent than what was put in place by Gov. Moonbeam in California that it will effectively eliminate the right to bear arms without benefit of a constitutional amendment, until such time as she can stack the court with like minded minions.
Toesandsoles
Member since 11/2015
2016-08-24 17:35:53
I'd rather be paranoid and in fear than watch America and American lives sell out to the world's opinion.
Radaghast
Member since 02/2013
E
2016-08-24 19:26:22
You'd rather be paranoid and in fear? Good grief. I'm glad I don't live in the USA.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-08-25 14:53:44
I hear you @Radaghast. It's frustrating to live here sometimes, there's more of that attitude here than you know and it's pretty embarrassing, frankly. Xenophobia, paranoia and fear are the order of the day. Trump is fanning the flames, it's the only way he can drum up support (well, that and Hillary's own flaws). White males in this country feel under attack, when what's really happening is their insecure about eventually being outnumbered. Now you know how Native Americans felt when the colonists started arriving.
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
TheFeetReview
Member since 12/2015
E
2016-03-23 19:41:53
Great to see that the next President of the United States has such wonderful feet! I would bow to her and kiss them!

9/10
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-03-23 19:45:15
[Note to self: Renew passport ASAP, before January 2017]
Toesandsoles
Member since 11/2015
2016-08-24 17:37:10
Nope. Arm yourself. It's time to #TakeAmericaBackAgain.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
female sole lover 6
Member since 05/2016
R
2016-05-14 00:29:31
i can´t believe this is real lol
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2016-05-14 01:34:24
America's exact sentiment when she take oval office.
GEMINISTALLION74
Member since 03/2013
D
2016-05-14 02:01:38
NOT SURE HOW SHE PLANS ON RUNNING THE COUNTRY FROM PRISON
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Elway
Member since 02/2014
K
2016-05-14 02:13:50
A lot of Hillary haters on this site. I guess I'm the exception, I admire her and think she'd be a good President.
joker777
Member since 01/2016
E
2016-05-14 02:27:19
Withya @Elway.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-08-02 18:23:04
There can be little to no doubt that she would be a better president than Chump. Unfortunately, that's not saying much. Hillary has serious issues, but she's not a congenital liar (no laughing, Beavis), nor does she have a thin skin, and a hair-trigger temper. My gut feeling is that Donald will self sabotage his campaign to avoid having to actually govern. He simply doesn't have the knowledge or attention span to be an effective leader, and deep down he knows it.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
Elway
Member since 02/2014
K
2016-08-02 19:27:33
@below the ankle, self-sabotage his own campaign? That's an interesting and insightful comment.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-08-03 02:52:09
Let's see if he tries to wiggle out of having to debate three times. In a group debate he could insult his way through it. But in a one-on-one debate with Hillary.......much bigger risk of being exposed as ignorant of the issues.
SlimJim
Member since 10/2011
D
2016-08-03 02:58:13
I would love to see him decimate her in any number of debates.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-08-03 14:52:40
Lots of men (and women too, I suppose) would love to see Donald evicerate Hillary. And he will no doubt try, assuming he even does debate. But his problem is he has even more baggage than she does! And her baggage is largely a result of service to our country, while his baggage is about his service to himself. If he has to actually answer questions instead of being able to defect them, he'll be in for a long night. Effin' draft dodger.
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
below the ankle
Member since 10/2014
2016-08-03 14:59:49
Make that "deflect", not "defect". He'll deflect the questions before defecting from the debate.
Elway
Member since 02/2014
K
2015-05-28 19:37:55
This is a nice and dare I say sexy picture of the next President of the United States.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
footsiefoot reborn
Member since 03/2015
K
2015-05-28 19:39:44
Piease please no say that please!
User rated ★(ugly feet)
ToothpickTorture
Member since 11/2013
K
2015-05-28 19:43:00
Hillary guilty of criminal neglect of both feet and Benghazi.
User rated ★(ugly feet)
footsiefoot reborn
Member since 03/2015
K
2015-05-28 19:45:06
Grounds for future impeachment if elected.
GEMINISTALLION74
Member since 03/2013
D
2015-08-28 13:04:38
I WOULD SAY THAT THERE'S NO WAY AN ATHEISTIC, SOCIALIST, ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL, PRO TOTALITARIAN DEVOTEE OF SAUL ALINSKI COULD GET TO THIS NATIONS TOP SEAT BUT OBAMA HAS ALREADY PROVED ME WRONG. I'LL JUST SAY THAT BACK WHEN SHE USED TO BE FEMALE SHE PROBABLY LOOKED OK. I'M NOT IN A HURRY TO SEE HER DORIAN GREY PIC RIGHT NOW. HEY HILLARY BENGHAZI-BENGHAZI-BENGHAZI. YOU MURDERUSS COW
chokeonfeet
Member since 12/2014
2015-09-18 23:03:08
socialist, anti-constitutional, and totalitarian are all bad things, but what's wrong with an atheist in office? An atheist might be more likely to let you lick her feet than a christian. Then again, maybe not. I don't know if there is a link between cheating and religion (or lack of). People of all persuasions seem to do it.
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
starbuckwylde
Member since 12/2010
2016-04-15 04:28:12
Is this a political blog now? Does her mishandling of Benghazi or her political affiliation somehow affect the appearance of her feet? I thought this site was overhauled to minimize this type of irrelevant nonsense. I'm baffled as to how the mods spent so much time and effort in overhauling the comment section and then essentially allowed it to go back to the way it was.
BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
K
2016-04-15 05:45:04
@SBW- Yes. Yes it does. One of the prophets of the owner/admin of this very site said,
"How beautiful upon the mountains
Are the feet of him who brings good news,
Who proclaims peace,
Who brings glad tidings of good things..."

That would *not* be her, therefore, her feet are *not* beautiful.
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
starbuckwylde
Member since 12/2010
2016-07-19 04:34:33
So do you check the political views and background of everyone you rate? You rated Cristina Scabbia's feet "beautiful" but how do you know that unless she disclosed to you her political affiliation? What if she's a Hillary supporter? Or if she isn't a Hillary supporter, will Cristina Scabbia's feet just automatically become ugly if she has a change of political opinion and DOES become a Hillary supporter? What if she already has and you weren't aware? What then say you of Cristina Scabbia's feet? Your foot rating system is as paradoxical as Schrödinger's hypothetical cat in a box.
Montresor
Member since 03/2014
D
2016-07-19 04:40:40
these feets makes me the happy and the sads

):( <--Schrödinger's emoticon
tjacks
Member since 04/2013
K
2016-07-19 04:42:05
@Montressor, that emoticon is sad no matter which way you view it.

(:(
Tff2184
Member since 11/2015
2016-08-03 01:24:41
Literally the only one on here that even resembles human female feet. Sadly, this was probably at least 1980 or earlier....Goodbye America. Even the first female president will have the feet of an oxen (sob).
DantéInExile
Member since 10/2014
E
2016-08-03 02:48:24
At least she won't build a wall so you can't get out. Something people forget about walls. Good for trapping people in too!

Her feet are well travelled indeed. She's still a GMILF to me and I would love the chance to reverse the aging process. And then go to work with Sarah Palin's feet. #independentfeet

And yes @starbuckwylde, if you are a liberal, you will have to tolerate a lot of political blogs around here. Highly privileged conservatives are very vocal about liberal feet. But dare not post on Palin's page about her children's book. (Autobiography/coloring book). And see if this even gets approved. But you see that all of the negative posts have already been approved. Very toxic here. I just stick around to throw acid. LOL!