Welcome to wikiFeet.

Top uploaders
Last 30 days
All time
celebs - 2092
(0.57% reported)
DPes - 2075
(25.35% reported)
Kawen Mr Jeyt - 1748
(0.34% reported)
Grik - 1646
(4.98% reported)
toelover143 - 1527
(0.20% reported)
disclamer
privacy statement

Gretchen Carlson

  (Go to IMDb page)
Shoe Size: 7.5 US edit
Nationality: United States edit
Rating stats (294 total votes)
160
beautiful
60
nice
37
ok
18
bad
19
ugly

Rating:
 (beautiful feet)
You Rated:  
 (click to rate)
Email me on new:   Pictures   Wall Posts  
+options
∨ Skip down to wall ∨
more info13 pictures were removed from this gallery.

People who liked Gretchen Carlson's feet, also liked:
Jennifer Aniston
Sandra Bullock
Olivia Munn
Roselyn Sanchez
Caterina Balivo
Got anymore Gretchen Carlson Feet Pictures? Upload Here
∧ Jump back to top ∧
Celebrity wall
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the trust guild more info

2014-11-07 05:07:50Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
Feet very average, glad to say...since she is hands down the most useless news anchor in the business. She is woefully stupid, her comments are asinine, and as someone who actually WORKS in broadcast news, I can say with a certain degree of clarity that she is one of the most disingenuous, ill-informed, poorly groomed anchors I have ever had the displeasure of watching. And please trust me when I say it isn't my dislike of Fox News that brings that out in me. I dislike CNN with equal fervor, for much the same, dishonest reasons. She and her ilk have ruined the news media for real journalists like myself. No one trusts us anymore. And because of people like her, O'Reilly, Hannity, Cooper, Olbermann and the rest, "reliable" journalism now lies in the hands of the public, whose handling of the news - let's be honest - is prejudicial at best. Shame on her, shame on Fox, shame on CNN and all the rest of the so-called journalists and news anchors who whored themselves out for a dollar and dishonored the once noble profession of journalism.

Admins, please don't censor me. This needs to be known. It needs to be known that the news we deliver to you - from local to national - is *deliberately* and blatantly censored. We deliberately edit comments so they fit "our" agenda. Literally *everything* you see and hear on ANY news network has been carefully edited to fit a political agenda. They have it down to a science, and that is exactly how they control you. I am reminded of one of the very first things I learned in Mass Communications: "The media may not control how you think, but they *do* control what you think *about*." And if you think they don't, my my my....you are in for a big surprise.
 
Reply
Block user
REVAN™  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-07 20:10:25
Now that's the spirit!
Block user
Reply
Family Destroyer  (user)2014-11-07 20:15:10
Oh great...this again...
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-07 20:15:21
@trs10- I gather from his post he *has* a job.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-08 15:59:23
@Spanky>"...she is hands down the most useless news anchor in the business." <--Obviously hasn't ever watched Nancy Grace. Unless she's not subsumed under the term 'new anchor.'
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2014-11-08 16:15:27
What are you saying, a news anchor who can jump rope, do push-ups, catch a ball, shake hands with a dog (extra credit for that one), has no value in the news industry? Well that's just news to me!
Block user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2015-01-08 22:29:24
Hahaha @iluvfeet - I concede your point. I was on a pissed off rampage when I wrote that post (obviously), but I'll not apologize for it. Every word of it is true. Yes, Family Destroyer (what kind of handle is that, anyway?), "this again." It's not politically biased. There is no conservative or liberal bent to it. In fact, the reality is far worse than you can comprehend. There are no political parties anymore. The large majority of politicians, both local and national, could not be classified as truly republican or democrat.

Point in case, Ronnie Musgrove - former governor of MS - ran for re-election on a pro-life, pro-gun platform...on the Democratic ticket. By definition he is the furthest thing from a Democrat, which just goes to show that they don't give two shits for which party they belong to, only whatever is available. The point is not to make the world a better place, but to gain power. And few non-political entities ever get closer to seeing all of this up close than a reporter.

And for the record, news anchors are more accurately portrayed in the movie, "Anchorman," than you might have guessed, haha. They read the news. That's about it. They may write a little, but the vast majority of what they write is just a minor variation of what the producers and reporters who actually go out and get and interpret that information have already written. I have good friends who are anchors, and if they get to know you, they'd tell you the same thing.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-08 22:35:06
@Spanky- I usually just refer the clueless who are doped up on The Blue Pill to "Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media" (1992) wherein he lays it all out (for nearly three hours) and crams the Red Pill down your throat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQhEBCWMe44
Block user
Reply
Kranz  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2015-01-08 22:38:40
@Spanky- This is my first time reading your original post and after finishing the thread I can tell you I feel like I've just gotten a hard smack from the truth bat. (:^D) @BIB- I was going to say the same thing.
Block user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2015-01-08 22:58:36
@ BiB - Chomsky is a little radical for my tastes, although his points are generally salient and his logic is always (almost!) sound for the most part. Supporting the conservative stance that college professors (all of them, apparently) are shoving their politics down their students throats, my own Advertising instructor made us watch Noam Chomsky videos fairly often which had little - if anything - to do with advertising, haha.

Thank you, Kranz. I try remain in the center politically - that way I can sling mud at ALL of them! And I also find it is the safest and sanest place to be. I can also stand on my own platform, which is the All Politicians are Lying, Degenerate Fools and Criminals Party, or APLDFCP for short. It's simple: any lawmaking entity which regularly votes itself raises for doing a job which is widely considered to be inadequate at best, downright treasonous at worst, is corrupt. Any governmental body that is not subject to the will of the people, and which defies the original purpose of its inception - that being the idea that politics is a temporary public service, and very decidedly *not* a career - and will not impose limits upon itself, and can no longer be trusted to do that which is best for its citizens, and is geared more toward increasing its own power than solving any issues - is obviously a government we should keep right on supporting, don't you think? Those guys are awesome, yeah?
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-08 23:16:28
At least it was my Mass Comm/Broadcasting (and Creative Expression) professor who put me onto him! That's a bit more germane.

I didn't say I buy into his politics, but I find his analysis of the Media conspiring with the Politicos (of whatever stripe is currently in power) to propagate "Necessary Illusions" to control the masses to be *spot-on.* You glean Truth where you find it, irrespective of the source.
Block user
Reply
Spankynuts  (user)  -  rated (bad feet)2015-01-08 23:49:54
Well said, BiB
Block user
Reply
2015-01-08 22:49:11  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)
Her feet and also taste in footwear are quite nice, but her legs ain't too great, and she has quasi-cankles.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-08 21:09:31Dangler  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
found one more on her facebook. it's 960x768. anything bigger is blown up by dantheman.
 
Reply
Block user
dantheman  (user)2015-01-08 22:03:53
Instagram-640x640
Facebook-960x768
Twitter-1024x779 or more.........do the math!
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-08 22:06:54
OK! 409,600
737,280
797,696

Did I pass?
Block user
Reply
dantheman  (user)2015-01-08 22:28:32
Hahaha .......A+!
Block user
Reply
2015-01-08 21:03:30Dangler  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)
Removed: Duplicate
from her ig. it's bigger than the one on twitter but im sure a larger version will show up
 
Reply
Block user
dantheman  (user)2015-01-08 21:37:57
Did you at least try to get it from Twitter 😒
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-08 21:45:54
I'm *not* a social media guy, but on some of them (I think maybe on both Failbook & Tweeter), I've noticed pics are all 'sized' to a uniform something like approx. 600x600 or whatever, but if you keep messing around and fight your way through to the *source* photo, it's often larger, sometimes much larger.
Block user
Reply
dantheman  (user)2015-01-08 22:12:01
Exactly! 👍
Block user
Reply
2015-01-08 21:38:40Mr. Me  (user)
The flip flops. We get to see the whole thing.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-08 21:04:46dantheman  (user)
Hey dangler I got this from Twitter ...hope you don't get mad about this
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-03 19:00:20Dangler  (user)
Removed: Duplicate
just as i thought dantheman is blowing pics up and reuploaded them.
 
Reply
Block user
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-01-03 19:07:42
And you're seconded, I've unreported yours & reported *theirs* as duplicate.
Block user
Reply
dantheman  (user)2015-01-03 20:51:51
Bro just get them from Twitter .....
Block user
Reply
dantheman  (user)2015-01-03 21:14:09
Ig makes pictures smaller (640x640) -___-....
Block user
Reply
2015-01-03 17:37:50Dangler  (user)
this is only on her ig page. i suspect someone likes to blow pictures up and reupload them.
 
Reply
Block user
HaMMerToE  (user)  -  rated (ok feet)2015-01-03 17:51:47
It on her twitter also
Block user
Reply
dantheman  (user)2015-01-03 18:38:18
The bigger the better 👍
Block user
Reply
dantheman  (user)2015-01-03 20:55:50
Check her Twitter ......Twitter is better than her ig page...
Block user
Reply
  TheRealLoverBoy1  (guild knight)2015-01-03 21:09:06
And I see, Twitter is good as well.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-03 17:38:34Dangler  (user)
from her Facebook page. Bigger than 1554451 that was posted on twitter.
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-02 19:02:51Toelvr  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)
Removed: Duplicate
lucky fish
 
Reply
Block user
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-02 19:14:33
There is a user whom I refuse to name that will surely reincarnate as a dead-skin eating fish.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-02 19:50:19
Yep. I know that guy.
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-02 23:41:59
Am I right?
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-02 23:51:57
@ILF- I'm sure, but we might as well ask him since he's onboard.
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-03 01:53:45
This is all I want in life honestly. I would die happy right now if I could come back as one of these fish. However my concern is that the natural flavor and scent may be tarnished by the water. Food for thought!
Block user
Reply
Iluvfeet  (user)2015-01-03 02:00:02
Think of it as salt and pepper on a juicy steak, makes it even better!
Block user
Reply
Lawrence2  (user)2015-01-03 02:30:23
Sounds delightful! I have also considered coming back as a yoga mat.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2015-01-03 02:35:10
^ ^ ^ Never thought of that, but it's a great idea! You'd be 'in like Flynn' with Kaley Cuoco and a *bunch* of others here.
Block user
Reply
2015-01-02 23:48:16GEMINISTALLION74  (user)
FLUFF YOUR PILLOW MA'AM....
 
Reply
Block user
2015-01-02 23:27:19dantheman  (user)
Here's the video
 
Reply
Block user
GEMINISTALLION74  (user)2015-01-02 23:29:24
ALWAYS LIKED THIS ONE:
Block user
Reply
2015-01-02 23:17:57dantheman  (user)
Here's a better picture!
You're welcome guys! 😄
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-12 21:11:00feetlover00  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
Flip flops, because she has great feet.
 
Reply
Block user
toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-05 23:55:46
my vote was for the pretty blue toes
Block user
Reply
Toetapper  (user)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-12-29 21:07:02
I have to go flip-flops, too. The more of her feet that are visible, the better.
Block user
Reply
2014-05-08 23:33:41Grik  (user)
Thet look a little busted and mutated here
 
Reply
Block user
LevelOne  (user)2014-12-10 21:24:17
LOL. Geez they look manish in this photo. Her veins are so big they look like ropes.
Block user
Reply
Toetapper  (user)2014-12-29 05:45:38
I like her as a commentator but never thought about her feet (that's odd for me). When I saw this photo, I knew that there might be a bunch that would be put off by her vascularity. I, however, am astonished. Her feet are lovely! Love the shape of her toes, too.

Can't go "Beautiful" until I get a good view of her arches & soles...but I'm ready to pull the trigger.
Block user
Reply
2014-12-05 23:50:59Mach9  (user)
Classic moment...if only ALL Fox News babes would follow her example!
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-08 12:07:04  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)
Show me a arch here please. Toe cleavage does not count.
 
Reply
Block user
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)2014-11-08 16:15:57
Well I'll bite my tongue on this one. I guess toe cleavage is legit now. Yea!!!!! About time.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-08 16:40:18
I have a tendency to interpret all rules contextually and as a 'body of work' rather than just a series of yes/no questions in black & white. In other words, I think on my feet in real time.

In this case, technically, this is "NFS" *but* hell, *half* her toes are showing almost to the nails (far more than 'cleavage'), AND combining the 'spirit' of the PQ in obscure galleries rule, there are so few pics in this gallery, WTF is the harm of leaving them *until* the gallery fills with barefoot shots of her? "Some picture is better than NO picture," as Eli's guideline goes. Plus they're cool shoes! ;) Did confirm a report here the other day of some fugly, way-closed pumps with almost nothing at all showing (even toe cleavage), no arch at all, etc.
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-08 16:56:04
I was gonna go all political rant and say, "If the SCOTUS can rule that murdering babies 'emanates from the penumbra' of the U.S. Constitution, then I can find an excuse for this picture to stay in this gallery for a while." But I won't do that. I will say:

If you and I and others *want* 'toe cleavage' to be legal, we can post a poll for it and *maybe* Eli will allow it, but it's gonna piss off a bunch of the old barefoot boys here even more than arches. For now, just go here (a *very* well designed and laid out site, btw):

http://toecleavage2.blogspot.com/
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)2014-11-08 17:17:47
@Angus, you have to understand that I follow the site guidelines to the "T". No toes, soles, arch, No Feet period. Obscure gallery or not. You get lenient here, other uploaders will see this and upload these pics elsewhere. Why would the uploaders who bypass the rules give a damn. If this pic had a arch showing and was blurry and grainy, or lets just say shitty in quality I would let it slide due to the small number of pics here. As for shoes my good friend, unlike you here, I don't care about no stinking shoes. lol!! I like shoes also but they do not factor into my decisions.
Block user
Reply
  Mr Hate  (guild knight)  -  rated (ugly feet)2014-11-08 17:22:02
When I said toe cleavage is legit now, i was referring to the rule Eli set forth when reporting a picture NFS. "You are about to report this picture as No Feet Showing. Pics showing any part of a toe/sole/arch ARE allowed and should not be reported. Reporting falsely may lead to your reporting privileges being revoked. Do you wish to continue? {YES} {NO}
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)2014-11-08 17:33:59
@Hate- Point taken on the 'slippery slope' on rules for uploads. That would definitely happen ("But I saw one *just like that* over in Jane Q. Doe's gallery!")

Speaking of 'slippery slopes'--
I just credited you for inspiring the new poll I just posted w/r/t "Toe Cleavage." Go vote! ;)
Block user
Reply
Grik  (user)2014-11-09 10:08:18
What, is a "shoe" ????
Block user
Reply
2014-11-08 10:06:34Remini Lover  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
This is good enough... Love every inch of her... 💋
 
Reply
Block user
2014-11-07 05:31:12  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)  -  rated (nice feet)
@Spanky- Now tell us how you *really* feel about her!
(:^p)

That's why many of us enlightened ones here get our news from BBC, Russia Today (RT), and other alternative news sources. Your Blue Pill news doesn't fool some of us! We're *smart* foot freaks!

@Kranz and I know that what you're saying there, our buddy Noam Chomsky already said here back in 1992:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO51ahW9JlE

Oh, and did I mention Gretchen has pretty decent feets? ;)
 
Reply
Block user
2014-08-12 16:49:47toeloverforever  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)
nice look, always love peeking at toes
 
Reply
Block user
Toe  (user)2014-09-16 06:02:00
This will do it for me! In love. (∿°○°)∿ ︵ ǝʌol
Block user
Reply
  BackInBlack60  (guild knight)2014-09-16 14:53:20
Works for me as well! Very nice.
Block user
Reply
pervertedpig  (user)  -  rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-09 22:53:36
@BIBs and Toe, but can she hold her own to the likes of Dana Perino and Megyn Kelly? God! Gretchen is sexy man!
Block user
Reply
mh18  (user)2014-11-07 04:30:28
Gotta throw Mika Brezinki in there
Block user
Reply
8 wall posts left