Now, can someone explain to poor, simple-minded moi, how any advertiser can look at this pic and determine there are no PS's on show?!?! Ergo, why does this pic subsist, but other pics featuring great looking ladies (who happen to be PS's) get kebabed?!?!I know any site featuring foot fetishism as it's base mantra is not meant to be rational, but I ask a legitimate Q here (gamoto!!!)
Levendi (user)2014-11-26 01:59:43
FD my friend, the look on her face says it all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2014-11-19 18:02:16Cybereyes (user)
Perfect example of a beautiful woman with disgusting feet. I've noticed some pics look worse than others. I think they just keep getting worse as she ages. She must sleep in heels. The new sin city was a perfect example. Her feet from the bottom as she sat in the tub looked like my grandmothers feet.
2014-11-06 02:49:13T10 (user) - rated (nice feet)
She's so cute from her head to her yummy toes!! Love the natural unpainted look..
2014-11-05 23:57:41Jarvis Cocker, Jr. (user) - rated (ok feet)
At last, I have the ineffable "honour" to report a Grik upload as duplicate as well. Bye bye, trollhead.
@xisterm- Either is against site rules, and someone has already reported it as Adult Content.
From Site Guidelines:
☻ wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. ===>Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked.
@Tarantino- You know better than that! But I really want to see the movie now.
Simply click on any photo on the site, then paste those numbers into the URL in place of the picture number (no need to change celeb name in URL; it's irrelevant), or simply paste them in place of the X's here:
♪♫ You swear you've heard it before As it slowly rambles on No need in bringing 'em back 'Cause they're never really gone ♪♫ ~"Old Fashioned Love Song" by Three Dog Night, 1975