No doubts about it, Hate. What I said refers to "redundant" pics, which includes the red carpet ones. As a matter of fact, I like red carpet pics simply because they are the best in quality and give outstanding closeups. In agreement, Dude!
I was on the fence between "nice" and "beautiful" for me, but something just stuns me about those feet despite a few flaws. She reminds me of being a lad about 19-20 when there was this bird in my university days (among a few) who drove me mad. She was a dead ringer for Blunt but with a fatter ass (better IMO) and had beautiful feet she wore in wedges and flops during the summer. I was involved with this redheaded stunner at the time and I remember once the bird who resembled Blunt told me if I broke it off she'd shag me. She was sober. It was maybe ten minutes past noon. Why in the holyiest of holy f*cks I didn't jump at that still pains me today. Advice to you younger lads about 18-22; don't put your eggs in just a few baskets. Imagine letting the equivalent of this stunning beauty slip through your fingers.
Very good statement indeed. Thanks for being honest with the community. This E. Blunt is precisely the case. No one can measure a full woman by her feet alone, even here at WikiFeet. Furthermore, everytime a pair of feet is deemed "Lousy" what is to be corrected? The feet or the subjective pattern? Addicted feet fetishists will answer: The feet! Since I am not a feet fetishist but a female feet lover (if they arouse me), I would say: Not that fast! Let's see pros and cons! Nice day, man!
Cthulhu (user)2012-11-28 01:22:20
Any guy that can romance at least one beautiful woman should consider himself damn lucky, most are not so fortunate.