Well, I don't know about you man, but I desagree with you. I think adult content would be someone showing off her intimate. I mean breasts, ass, but something that you can really see. There was just some erotic pictures, and I think who visit this website likes erotic pictures involving feet.
There is NO ADULT CONTENT in any of these pics!!! It would be the same exact view if she was wearing a thong!!! Wake up you puritanical dumbass!!!
souf (user)2010-10-06 21:02:40
the last 10 pics r not from ellen roche, is from a brazilian woman called tathy rio
tj (user)2011-03-12 22:18:10
@admirer1..douchebag....what part of NO NUDITY CROPPED BLOCKED OUT OR OTHERWISE DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?? you are an idiot if there is PART of a bare breast showing THAT is adult content...Now If you ACTUALLY have been with a girl who was naked(I know It's men for you) you would understand that. so F*ckoff and go to gay porn sites..pole smoker
footmanshoo (user)2011-03-13 01:54:07
@tj so basically every pic on this site with a girl in a bikini should be reported as adult content. I see. You're the idiot closest homo you claimed that admirer1 was if you're so uptight about how much a girl can show without actually being nude. The pictures weren't manipulated or cropped by the uploaders. They were like that from the start. I did us all (except for you, obviously) a favor and unreported the pictures. Don't do it again or I'll report you to the webmaster (which is easy to do by the way, and he actively responds to emails) for intentionally reporting pictures that aren't adult content. Piss off.
Creator (admin)2011-03-13 11:00:35
I happen to agree with tj on this one. some of these pics were a bit on the adult side. there's nothing wrong with a thong picture, but there is if the celeb is pulling it off while there's a close up on her ass.. in any case, there's no need for foul language here guys. you can make your point without insulting each other ;)