SweetFeetFan (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-11 20:27:30
I wish the trust guild would block any comments like this. I don't see what her being gay has to do with anything.
ringoquads (user) - rated (ok feet)2014-11-11 20:41:14
@SweetFeetFan, it's just a simple observation. no big deal really. imho.
BackInBlack60 (guild knight)2014-11-11 20:55:31
The OP is obviously aptly named.
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-11 21:41:30
I believe OP was referencing an earlier comment I made, which was a reply to a comment @Hate made. Look below at 10-05-14. In *that* context, I can see how it got approved.
idiot756 (user)2014-11-12 06:40:08
Well now I'm confused. Why wouldn't my comment be approved? I did nothing wrong or mean. I agree with ringoquads. As for what BIB said there, that's an unwarranted personal attack, but I would prefer to just drop it at that.
KayleeAngelia (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-12-25 02:32:29
And yet for people like me and her...? Siiiigh...dreamy cute little feet...
asianlover85 (user) - rated (bad feet)2015-02-20 13:52:17
Wow... Talk about freedom of speech. Are you knights all the same? Cause I just started noting a pattern whenever you rate higher a girl someone else complains about.
"OP is obviously aptly named."
REVAN™ (user) - rated (nice feet)2015-02-20 13:59:10
"...so I wasn't sad when she came out" was the part @BIB was referring to with his statement I'm sure.