@Vivi- Thanks. Was answered already 2014-10-10 00:11:00 by Pinchy69 but in separate comment down there that 'drifted away.' We were ignoring this user because he's a big troll and had just flamed several users here (comments got rejected & are gone now).
2014-10-07 15:35:57BackInBlack60 (user)
Removed: Adult Content
@absent- #1481065 is Adult Content even though the nips have been pixellated. From site rules: o wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked.
Mr Hate (guild knight) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-10 00:22:26
You get a life @brwnEYE....Don't spout off at other members just because they are explaining the site guidelines. You know you might not care now but holy crap are you going to care soon enough. Keep it up!! You'll be doing all sorts of caring.
Hmmm... It's almost as if we were talking to NO ONE. I don't see a thing, do you guys? ;) Ironic that post was actually done as a *service* if he had the brains to figure out how/why! ;) ;)
I probably really should think of getting a life. I had once, once upon a time. This is pretty much it now.
Toe (user)2014-10-10 01:11:10
@BIB - What is life? Who decides what it is? I certainly don't think that anyone who says that to people they are mad at could in any way be uniquely qualified to tell anyone to get one. It's more, a show of their insecurity and ignorance than anything. So don't give it a second thought. We were talking on no one. Exactly.
BackInBlack60 (user)2014-10-10 19:09:34
@Hate>"You know you might not care now but holy crap are you going to care soon enough. Keep it up!! You'll be doing all sorts of caring."
@Hate- Why, I think he cares NOW! Hey, @brEYEn - Whaddya think? What? Can't respond? What's wrong, dude?
some are too over eager to critique as duplicate and poor quality
BackInBlack60 (user)2014-09-21 15:21:47
@FBiFC- There is a new rule in the site guidelines (see small link on Home Page) that states any picture at the same event/setting in which the *feet position* is the same may be considered a duplicate. It's intended to keep from cluttering the gallery with very *similar* pics, as some uploaders trying to pad their stats will load 50 or more pics that are nearly the same. In this case, as @Toelvr said, perhaps a little overzealous.
o When considering a large amount of pictures from the same event (Red Carpet, Movie stills, etc..) the feet of the celebrity should be positioned differently in each picture, otherwise they will be deemed duplicate and should be reported as such.
Well, there is intent and there is enforcement. And honestly, it is not a duplicate. People should actually pay attention to the ENTIRE photo, not just the feet...which I know sounds weird based on the subject matter of the site, but the pictures ARE different, as her body is in a slightly different position as well. Although considering how often Candice and other models show their feet, I can kinda see why people want to cut down or at least curtail feet pictures for them. Still, seems like the rules need a little fine-tuning concerning enforcement.