@Grik, Agreed! Its always about the feet ! And im enjoying these big lovlies!
2014-06-01 13:24:48Grik (user)
@Spankynuts, hi. Agreed but if the comment isn't about feet then it shouldn't be on the wall. Noted it doesn't transgress the rules as quoted by you but it is a site about FEET, and unless the comment has some connection with feet, it should be kebabed.
2014-06-01 13:05:17Spankynuts (user)
@Grik - "The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics." It doesn't get really specific, so even though it isn't about feet, and though it may not be an intellectual comment, per se', I would not reject it, even so. It isn't "Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit," so it should stay, even if you disagree. Just my opinion.
2014-06-01 08:57:24Grik (user)
@darkartsDA, with respect to you, your comments are well-intentioned but wrong. IF pics featured on this site show feet only, then, yes, we would be judging the feet only. But the pics show the whole person plus feet, so, people being human, judge the total package. And, people being judgemental, some of us colour the standard of the feet by the standard of what is attached to them, and/or whether we particularly like the person or not. Now, in saying the above, the lamebrain below who makes the comment "great actress, but not sexy" typically doesn't comment on feet, and his comment should have been rejected.
I see people are still basing their ratings and personal opinions on the general physical appearances (race/weight/skin tone/facial beauty) rather than the feet.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but last I checked, this was a site dedicated to feet & not the overall body.
Sure, she's a little on the heavy side, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with the appearance of her feet or how the legs lead up to the feet. Great colour choices for the nails, great texture, and great shape.