40oz Bottle (user)2014-10-04 05:15:18
I dont see why. Are you sure its not just the shoes and maybe you wanting to try them on?
Templar97 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-04 05:17:56
... ????? (:^o)
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-06 04:11:45
@40??? WTF, man? Were you DRUNK when you posted that? That's not cool, man. Not sure how that got approved. You owe @Tweety an apology, dude. That was a really douchy thing to say.
Toe (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-10-06 04:51:27
...the f*ck did he just say?
Iluvfeet (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-06 04:53:49
Further prove that many people here have their head up their a$$.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-06 04:56:16
@TRLB- That's what's so douchy about it... @Tweety is *far* too nice a person to retaliate and stoop to @40's subhuman level.
Iluvfeet (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-10-06 04:59:04
@40 - If you were joking you forgot the ":)" otherwise WTF, that's @Tweety you're talking to.
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-11 21:56:33
So @40...did you ever apologize to @tweety? You know, like a man? Or did you run away like a coward? Your recent (hopefully, prolonged) absence from this site pretty much tells the story, doesn't it? Good riddance.
tweety (guild knight)
- rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-11 22:17:43
I have never responded to this thread because it seemed to me @40 was just trying to flame me.I don't come here to play that type of game just not me or my personality.Instead I do take a "high road" unless called out on more important issues that call my character into question then I respond and take it to GC I will however say I APPRECIATE all who truly know me for their support THANK-YOU ALL:):):)
mike7878 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-11 22:21:36
Good to know there are still really thin skinned people out there who get offended by innocuous comments made by strangers on the interweb. I thought they'd all vanished along with the Commodore 64 and Space Invaders.
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-11 22:28:09
See...I come from the oldschool mindset where if you got into a fistfight with somebody you didn't particularly care for, you still shook hands when the dust settled. And maybe even shared a case of beer and laughed about it afterwards and gained a new friend. @40 dodged all that. He sniped @tweety and ran away like a coward. Hasn't been seen since. He's so cowardly that he even ran away from *behind a computer monitor* LOL
@mike7878: it has nothing to do with being thinskinned. I'm one of the *least* thin-skinned people you'll ever meet.
mike7878 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-12 07:45:05
Exactly. He 'sniped.' A stranger sniped on the interweb. You have far too much times on your hands.
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-12 16:53:26
It took all of thirty seconds of my life to type my reply and hit Submit. This one took about seven.
"You have far too much times on your hands"
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-12 17:08:43
Everyone on the Internet may indeed be 'strange' but not all should be considered 'strangers.' Two of my *best* friends in the world I met on websites. Though I've never met either one face-to-face, one I speak to on the phone for an hour every Sunday and he has been a life-saver to me and helped me many times, and the other, an Iraq war vet with PTSD, well I'm fostering his black lab dog for him until he can get out of treatment and get his head on straight.
@mike7878- Not exactly a 'stranger.' Some, like a random commenter on a Yahoo news story, are 'strangers.' Even though you've been around a long time and we've seen you, being *rarely* seen here in wall posts, you are pretty much a 'stranger' to most of us. People like 40oz. we see *often* and knew him under another username before that. Tweety we 'see' here and 'talk' to *every* day; we 'know' him fairly well.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-12 17:10:17
Oh, and BTW... @40, you still owe @Tweety an apology for that shitty comment. If you were *joking* you should have used an emoticon to indicate that, like ;) or <bg> but you didn't.
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-12 17:26:34
I find it interesting that Mike7878 has been a member since Jan 2011 (Quite a long timeSPAn) yet I've *never* seen him post *anything* on WF until last night. He certainly hasn't posted anything since the New Walls were constructed. #justanobservation
TheRealLoverBoy1 (user)2014-11-12 17:36:25
It is more #foodforthought ;)
And I'll 2nd everyone, @40 is still trying to remove said shoe from his forehead (courtesy of the guild) ... & @m78 bro if you do not care/"too cool" for this then why are you here?
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-12 17:48:48
@FD- You are correct about M7878- I thought I'd seen his name around on occasion, and he *has* uploaded, but this is his first and only comment on the new walls.
TommyTheTickler (user)2014-11-12 20:01:11
Iluvfeet (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-12 20:15:31
Let's go easy on @M7878, it's possible he's never had a friend stick up for him, or no friends that are worth defending! All this may be a new experience for him.
mike7878 (user)2014-11-12 23:34:20
Sharp tongues are no indication of a keen mind. It's sometimes hard to get the big picture when you deal with people that have such a small screen, so I'll bow out at this point and let you guys dry your tears together in private while you discuss lifes important issues.
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-13 00:01:23
Awesome. The smartest decision you've made all day. Maybe all month.
"I'll bow out at this point"
seedman (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-13 00:06:34
Have to agree with M78. I assumed the purpose of the guild was to root out the ridiculous attention seeking threads from the people with an IQ of ze.ro. Seems like the guild is not so awesome right now
Mr Hate (guild knight)
- rated (ok feet)2014-11-13 00:17:54
The mistake your making @seman is you trying to figure it out. Buzz off.
54 (user)2014-11-13 00:31:26
@Iluvfeet Actually, if I'm not mistaken, 7878 did have a user here at wikiFeet "Back him up" (I believe he may have also stood up for him as well :^o). The name was "tonysoprano" AKA tony'smanho. What you're right about is that one wasn't worth defending. So did 40oz. ever apologize to tweety?
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-13 01:05:28
Will the real 40oz Bottle please stand up?
@seedman: Oh look! *YET* another out-of-the-blue account---with ZERO wall comments up until this point---defending 40oz. The *only* comments in M7878 and seedman's *entire WF posting history* just happen to be in this thread. LOL
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-13 01:12:10
Hey, well *props* for them planning ahead with a 2011 & 2013 SPA. Also, this-->"It's sometimes hard to get the big picture when you deal with people that have such a small screen" is a keeper. You glean truth where you find it. Even a blind hog roots up an ear of corn every now and then. And God used a jackass to speak to Balaam. You get the idea. 40-oz. aka TickleMe still owes Tweety an apology for the douchy comment.
seedman (user)2014-11-13 02:33:21
At least we now know the guild idea is incapable of monitoring the children in this playpen.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-13 02:56:28
@seedy- Not entirely true. Most inappropriate comments are now seen only by dozens of users, not thousands. Only approved comments 'go public,' while the rest are *only* seen by logged-in Guild members, and it only takes a handful of them to approve or reject any comment.
seedman (user)2014-11-13 21:45:08
Black: I take your point but am not entirely sure what you mean. As an example, this juvenile thread can be seen by anyone and I thought the purpose of the guild was to root out and get rid of the idiot attention seekers who add nothing.
54 (user)2014-11-13 21:48:37
With a name like "seedman," what kind of something could be added?
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-11-13 22:01:41
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site.
And, the instructions on the Guild comment page say:
Guild members, here's a few things you need to know:
Before approving a comment, you must make sure it doesn't contain any sexual refs, hateful, racist or derogatory expressions.
You must not reject a comment just because you don't agree with it. People are allowed to voice their opinions as long as they are respectful.
That is *all* the Guild is tasked with censoring--- gross explicit sexual comments, 'hate-speech' (bigotry/racism), and 'derogatory expressions,' whatever that subsumes.
If there was *any* failing of the Guild in this thread, it was perhaps in approving 40-oz. original douchy comment, which most likely was made while he was drunk, and for reasons known only to him (maybe, if he even recalls posting it... he sometimes has seen subsequent posts made while drunk and wondered when he ever said such a thing). I'll add that, as Tweety said, *he* was not trying to be an 'attention-seeker' at all, in fact took a *long* time to even respond to the thread, and that being to thank *others* for their defense of him. It is starting to appear, however, that *you* are trying to be an 'attention-seeker' by continuing this thread with comments like those above.
AND... 40-oz. still has not apologized to Tweety, and several of us will not tolerate his presence again here until he does.
"And that's all I got to say 'bout THAT."
@Seedy- Nope, nothing at all about 'attention-seekers.' You'll notice at the top of this page, it says:
Family Destroyer (user)2014-11-13 22:06:59
@manseed: why are you now posting Wall comments for the first time? I'm curious. The New Walls have been up since Feb 2014 and the *only* time you speak is to defend 40oz. Same thing with M7878. No comments for months and months THEN bam! he gets chatty.
seedman (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-13 23:42:56
The fact You obsess about who why and when anonymous strangers made forum posts says more about your life than it does mine, so I will leave you to it. Carry on.
seedman (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-11-13 23:47:48
Black: I don't doubt the validity of what you say, I would simply ask how you think this moronic thread has improved the site, and if it hasn't improved the site why is it even still here, that's the only point I was trying to make, I was just trying to be constructive and don't actually care either way.