Welcome to wikiFeet.
Click here to login
Last 30 days
ToothpickTorture - 8134 (0.14% reported) sterne - 4145 (0.82% reported) celebs - 2430 (0.49% reported) Grik - 1797 (10.63% reported) Feet1961 - 1710 (24.68% reported)
7.5 US edit
Rating stats (132 total votes)
∨ Skip down to wall ∨ more info2 pictures were removed from this gallery.
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
Add a comment
BackInBlack60 (guild knight) 2015-01-07 20:49:39
Based on... what? I'd believe a 7 maybe based on what I see, but as I've told @warpedmind, it's just damn near impossible to just eyeball it off of pictures. In person, yes, but pics are very tough. They look wide, like even if she's a 6 or 6½, she may have to buy 7 or 7½ to accommodate the width. But the real question is... whoever put in 7½ to begin with, where'd *they* get that?
derek62676 (user) 2015-01-17 06:49:49
i agree with u
ringoquads (user) - rated (bad feet) 2015-01-05 21:44:00
@meatclever, I would love to use your name to take a piece of bacon off this woman's back.
ringoquads (user) - rated (bad feet) 2015-01-05 21:52:12
folks, I understand my comment will not be approved by the first guild member with a messed up sense of humour, morality, and one who doesn't appreciate pig jokes
Marty6785 (user) - rated (beautiful feet) 2014-09-27 17:55:24
Right there with you!