legend00115 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-07-13 14:04:43
Maybe so. One thing is for sure, hers are definitely worth enjoying.......
catsman11 (user)2014-09-02 01:27:05
These are just about perfect for certain.
joker999 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-11 03:32:42
Should be ranked Gorgeous.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-09-11 03:41:23
@joker999- Interesting you say that. @Pinchy69 is trying to figure out what it takes to do that. This one has an average rating of 4.5688 stars, yet is *not* Gorgeous, but we found that Kristen Bell averaged 4.49 but *is* - but with *many* more total votes. Must have to do with Wikifeet overall ranking. You can check those by going to the Celebs page and sorting by ranking.
joker999 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-11 03:44:28
@BIB60 - One day I'm going to do a poll about this issue. Though it may not really solve it.
BackInBlack60 (user) - rated (nice feet)2014-09-11 03:53:46
@joker- Well, @P69 *meant* to ask @Creator during the last monthly Fireside Chat, but forgot, so now he'll be pulling his hair out for another 21 days! I really don't give a sh*t about rankings or anyone else's ratings beside my own, but the *math* and programming aspect of it has *me* going! I've got to know how the algorithm works that causes the 'bold 5-star gorgeous' vs. mere 5-star beautiful. Four years on the site, and until a week ago, I never even knew there was a 'Gorgeous' that was higher than 5-star! [SMH!]
joker999 (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2014-09-11 04:01:53
Yeah it is strange lol. And yup ratings isn't going to change how much I love my faves.