"Sometimes pictures give the impression of adult content, even though they aren't. When a picture is cropped to show nothing but skin and give the impression that the girl is naked, or if there's a close-up on feet that give away a weird/porn-like pose, I tend to remove it. I try to look at galleries from the advertisers' point of view (as I depend on them to keep the site going, and they have zero tolerance for edgy content). If I enter a gallery and get the feeling I've entered an adult site, I start removing pictures until it looks SFW.
So I'm sorry, but I stand behind my decision to remove those pics. Also, please try to see things my way and avoid from uploading such pics in the future."
2016-01-21 06:13:03Footj*bKing (user)
Now Your Talking..
Illuminati star (user) - rated (beautiful feet)2016-01-21 06:25:53
@Popaczek- I agree the A/C rules here are a joke, but they are what they are and apparently driven by the advertisers. Here's the actual rule:
o wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked.
But to see a long discussion and examples of some crazy things that the Owner/Admin *himself* has removed, see http://www.wikifeet.com/Franciely_Freduzeski posts by @graycat around 11/30/2014.